Advertisement

Conceptual Models of Ill-Defined Systems

  • Richard M. Young
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 16)

Abstract

I take it that an essential property of an ill-defined system is that it lends itself to no single analysis which is both correct and also adequate to answer all relevant questions. Instead of this, we have to make use of a variety of different views, hoping to find (at least) one which is appropriate for a given purpose. These alternative analyses are only partial, and to a certain extent fictional. None of them can be taken as an account of the system “as it really is”.

Keywords

Conceptual Model Basic Calculation Core Task Arithmetical Expression Task Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Card, S. K., 1979. A method for calculating performance times for users of interactive computing systems. In Proceedings of the 1979 Conference on Cybernetics and Society. Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  2. du Boulay, J. B. H., O’Shea, T. and Monk, J., 1981, The black box inside the glass box: presenting computing concepts to novices. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 14, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hewlett-Packard, 1979, Advanced calculator logic HP RPN/Algebraic: A comparative analysis. Hewlett-Packard Corporation.Google Scholar
  4. Kasprzyk, D. M., Drury, C. G. and Bialas, W. F., 1979, Human behavior and performance in calculator use with Algebraic and Reverse Polish Notation. Ergonomics, 22, 1011–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mayer, R. E., 1981, The psychology of how novices learn computer programming. Computing Surveys, 13, 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Young, R. M., 1981, The machine inside the machine: Users’ models of pocket calculators. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, 51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Young, R. M., 1982, Surrogates and mappings: Two kinds of conceptual models for interactive devices. In D. Gentner and A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard M. Young
    • 1
  1. 1.MRC Applied Psychology UnitCambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations