Conceptual Models of Ill-Defined Systems
I take it that an essential property of an ill-defined system is that it lends itself to no single analysis which is both correct and also adequate to answer all relevant questions. Instead of this, we have to make use of a variety of different views, hoping to find (at least) one which is appropriate for a given purpose. These alternative analyses are only partial, and to a certain extent fictional. None of them can be taken as an account of the system “as it really is”.
KeywordsConceptual Model Basic Calculation Core Task Arithmetical Expression Task Domain
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Card, S. K., 1979. A method for calculating performance times for users of interactive computing systems. In Proceedings of the 1979 Conference on Cybernetics and Society. Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
- Hewlett-Packard, 1979, Advanced calculator logic HP RPN/Algebraic: A comparative analysis. Hewlett-Packard Corporation.Google Scholar
- Young, R. M., 1982, Surrogates and mappings: Two kinds of conceptual models for interactive devices. In D. Gentner and A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum (in press).Google Scholar