Advertisement

Examples and Learning Systems

  • Edwina L. Rissland
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 16)

Abstract

Any system that learns or adapts — whether well- or ill-defined, man or machine — must have examples, experiences, and data on which to base its learning or adaptation. Too often, however, the examples that form the basis of learning are taken for granted. This paper will concentrate on the examples as a study in their own right.

Keywords

Learning System Generate Test Data Empty List Prior Problem Phrase Structure Grammar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berman, H. J., “Legal Reasoning”. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, MacMillan, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. De Millo, R.A., Lipton, R. J., Perlis, A. J., “Social Processes and Proofs of Theorems and Programs”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 22, No. 5, May 1979. Reprinted in the Mathematical Intelligencer, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1980.Google Scholar
  3. Fuller, L. L., and M. A. Eisenberg, Basic Contract Law. West Publishing Co., Minn., 1981.Google Scholar
  4. Gazdar, G., “Phrase Structure Grammar”. In Jacobson, P., and G.K. Pullun (Eds.) The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Reidel, 1982, pp. 131–187.Google Scholar
  5. Gazdar, G., “Unbounded Dependencies annd Coordinate Structure”. Linguistic Inquiry 12 (1981), 155–184.Google Scholar
  6. Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Edition. University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Lakatos, I., Proofs and Refutations. Cambridge University Press, London, 1976. Also in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14, No. 53, May 1963.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Lenat, D. B., “Automatic Iheory Formation in Mathematics”, Proceedings of Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Inteligence. Cambridge, MA., 1977.Google Scholar
  9. Levi, E. H., Introduction to Legal Reasoning. University of Chicago Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  10. Minsky, M. L., “A Framework for Representing Knowledge”. In The Pyschology of Computer Vision, Winston (ed), McGraw-Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
  11. Polya, G., Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, Volumes I and II. Princeton University Press, 1968.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Restatement, Second, Contracts. American Legal Institute, Philadelphia, 1981.Google Scholar
  13. Rissland, E. L., “Examples in the Legal Domain: Hypotheticals in Contract Law”. In Proceedings Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Ann Arbor, August 1982.Google Scholar
  14. Rissland, E. L., Constrained Example Generation. COINS Technical Report 81–24, University of Massachusetts, 1981a.Google Scholar
  15. Rissland, E. L., The Structure of Knowledge in Complex Domains. COINS Technical Report 80–07, University of Massachusetts, 1981b. Also to appear in Proceedings NIE-LRDC Conference on Thinking and Learning Skills, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Rissland, E. L., “Example Generation”. In Proceedings Ihird National Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, Victoria, B. C., May 1980.Google Scholar
  17. Rissland, E. L., The Structure of Mathematical Knowledge. A. I. Tech Report 472, A. I. Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1978.Google Scholar
  18. Rissland, E. L., “Understanding Understanding Mathematics”. Cognitive Science, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1978.Google Scholar
  19. Rissland, E. L., and E. M. Soloway, “Overview of an Example Generation System”. In Proc. First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Stanford, August 1980a.Google Scholar
  20. Rissland, E. L., “Generating Examples in LISP”. Proceedings International Workshop on Program Construction. Bonas, France, 1980b.Google Scholar
  21. Samuel, A. L., “Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers”. In Computers and Thought, Feigenbaum and Feldman (Eds.), McGraw-Hill, 1963.Google Scholar
  22. Samuel, A. L., “Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers. II—Recent Progress”. In IBM J. Research and Development, 11: 601–617, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Selfridge, O. G., “Pandemonium — A Paradigm for Learning”. In Symposium on the Mechanization of Thought Processes. Teddington, England, 1958.Google Scholar
  24. Selfridge, O. G., “An Adaptive Sorting Algorithm”. In Proceedings Third National Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, Victoria, B.C., May 1980.Google Scholar
  25. Selfridge, O. G., “COUNT — How a Computer Might Do It”. Internal Report, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc, 1979.Google Scholar
  26. Soloway, E. M., “Learning = Interpretation + Generalization: A Case Study in Knowledge-Directed Learning”. COINS Technical Report 78–13, University of Massachusetts, 1978.Google Scholar
  27. Sussman, G. K., A Computational Model of Skill Acquisition. A.I. Tech Report 297, A. I. Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1973. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
  28. Swartout, W. and R. Balzer, “On the Inevitable Intertwining of Specification and Programming”. CACM Vol. 25, No. 7, July 1982.Google Scholar
  29. Winston, P. H., “Learning Structural Descriptions from Examples” in The Psychology of Computer Vision, Winston (ed), McGraw-Hill, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edwina L. Rissland
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information ScienceUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations