Advertisement

Variability in Microvascular Estimates of Capillary Surface Area for Exchange

  • Ingrid H. Sarelius
  • Tara A. Nealey
  • Terrence E. Sweeney
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 242)

Abstract

A recurring and tantalizing deficiency in many areas of microvascular research is the problem of quantitative reconciliation of measurements made in whole organs (or whole animals) versus those made at the level of individual microvessels. With respect to endothelial cell function, it is recognized that whole organ measurements of capillary filtration coefficient yield values that are 10–20 times lower than single vessel permeability measurements,1 and that observed transport rates of macromolecules in experimental systems at low volume flows exceed calculations based on the two pore model.2 It is clear that at least a partial contribution to these discrepancies lies in the assumptions underlying the models or experimental systems. For example, comparison of data collected by whole organ versus single vessel approaches depends on how ‘typical’ is the single vessel selected for measurement, or on assumptions describing heterogeneity of function in the whole organ approach.

Keywords

Capillary Density Single Vessel Capillary Blood Flow Cremaster Muscle Functional Capillary Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Crone and O. Christensen, Transcapillary transport of small solutes and water, Int. Rev. Physiol. 18:149–213 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E.M. Renkin, Capillary transport of macromolecules: pors and other endothelial pathways, J. Appl. Physiol. 58:315–325 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F.E. Curry, V.H. Huxley and I.H. Sarelius, Techniques in the microcirculation: measurement of permeability, pressure and flow, in “Techniques in the Life Sciences,” vol. P3/1, R.S. Linden, eds., pp. 1–34, Elsevier, New York (1983).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Rippe, A. Kamiya and B. Folkow, Simultaneous measurements of capillary diffusion and filtration exchange during shifts in filtration-absorbtion and at graded alterations in the capillary permeability surface area product (PS), Acta Physiol. Scand. 104:318–336 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Krogh, The number and distribution of capillaries in muscles with calculations of the oxygen pressure head necessary for supplying the tissue, J. Physiol. 52:409–415 (1919).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Klitzman, D.N. Damon, R.J. Gorczynski and B.R. Duling, Augmented tissue oxygen supply during striated muscle contraction in the hamster: relative contributions of capillary recruitment, functional dilation and reduced tissue PO2, Cir. Res. 51:711–721 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.D. Gray and E.M. Renkin, Microvascular supply in relation to fiber metabolic type in mixed skele-tal muscles of rabbits, Microvasc. Res. 16:406–425 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    I.H. Sarelius, L.C. Maxwell, S.D. Gray and B.R. Duling, Capillarity and fiber types in the cremaster muscle of rat and hamster, Am. J. Physiol. 245:H368-H374 (1983)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.F. McDonagh, R.W. Gore and S.D. Gray, Perfused capillary surface area in postural and locomotor skeletal muscle, Microvasc. Res. 24:142–157 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.R. Kayar and N. Banchero, Sequential perfusion of skeletal muscle capillaries, Microvasc. Res. 30:298–305 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E.M. Renkin, Flow and distribution of India ink in microvessels of the frog, Microvasc. Res. 29:32–44 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Henquell and C.R. Honig, Intercapillary distances and capillary reserve in right and left ventricles: significance for control of tissue PO2,Microvasc. Res. 12:35–41 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. Vetterlein, H. dalRi and G. Schmidt, Capillary density in rat myocardium during timed plasmastaining, Am. J. Physiol. 242:H133-H141 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.M. Renkin, S.D. Gray and L.R. Dodd, Filling of microcirculation in skeletal muscles during timed India ink perfusion. Am. J. Physiol. 241:H174-H186 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G.R. Cokelet, Speculation on a cause of low vessel hematocrits in the microcirculation, Microcirculation 2:1–18 (1982).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B.R. Duling, I.H. Sarelius and W.F. Jackson, A comparison of microvascular estimates of capillary blood flow with direct measurements of total striated muscle blood flow. Int. J. Microcirc. Clin. Exp. 1:409–424 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    I.H. Sarelius, D.N. Damon and B.R. Duling, Microvascular adaptations during maturation of striated muscle, Am. J. Physiol. 241:H317-H324 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    I.H. Sarelius, Cell flow path influences transit time through striated muscle capillaries, Am. J. Physiol. 250:H899-H907 (1986).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G.W. Snedecor and W.G. Cochran, “Statistical Methods,” 6th ed., Iowa State University Press, Ames. lA (1967).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    T.E. Sweeney and I.H. Sarelius, Does location within a microvascular network influence arteriolar function? Proc. Int. Union Physiol, Sci. 16:526 (Abstract) (1986).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. Lund, D.H. Damon, D.N. Damon and B.R. Duling, Capillary grouping in hamster tibiahs anterior muscles: flow patterns and physiological significance, Int. J. Microcirc. Clin. Exp. 5:359–372 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    R.T. Yen and Y.E. Fung, Effect of velocity distribution on red cell distribution in capillary blood vessels. Am. J. Physiol. 235:H251-H257 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. Gaehtgens, K.U. Benner, S. Schickendantz and K.H. Albrecht, Method for simultaneous determination of red cell and plasma flow velocity in vitro and in vivo. Pflugers Arch. 361:191–195 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M.C. Starr and W.G. Frasher, In vivo cellular and plasma velocities in microvessels of the cat mesentery, Microvasc. Res. 10:102–106 (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingrid H. Sarelius
    • 1
  • Tara A. Nealey
    • 1
  • Terrence E. Sweeney
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Biophysics and PhysiologyUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations