Advertisement

New Developments in the Etiology and Pathogenesis of Bacterial Vaginosis

  • Carol A. Spiegel
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 224)

Abstract

Vaginitis by definition means inflammation of the vagina and is to be distinguished from cervicitis which has its own set of pathogens. We are aware of relatively few agents that cause vaginitis. Trichomonas vaginalis, a protozoan parasite, is usually associated with a voluminous, often frothy, green vaginal discharge. Yeast vaginitis is usually caused by the yeast-like fungus Candida albicans and is characterized by a curd-like vaginal discharge often associated with itching. Vaginitis caused by these two agents has been termed specific vaginitis and represents approximately 50% of all cases. Patients presenting to a physician with complaints of vaginitis but having evidence of neither T. vaginalis nor C. albicans were defined as having nonspecific vaginitis (NSV). NSV is not a new syndrome. As early as 1895, Kronig (1) published drawings of vaginal fluid from patients with NSV which showed a mixed flora devoid of large rods and including vibrio-like organisms. Later Doderlein (cited in reference 2) described three grades of vaginal flora. Grade I, defined as a clean vagina, contained large rod-shaped organisms which became known as Doderlein’s bacilli and represent various species of the genus Lactobacillus. Grade II was a mixed flora, and Grade III, the pathological flora, was notable by its absence of the large rod-shaped organisms. Kronig’s drawings and Doderlein’s description of the Grade III flora are characteristic of the syndrome we now call NSV.

Keywords

Bacterial Vaginosis Vaginal Discharge Vaginal Flora Vaginal Fluid Vaginal Epithelial Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I. Kronig. Uber die Natur der Scheidenheme, Speciell über das vorkommen anaerorber Streptokokken in Scheidensekret Schwangerer. Centralbl. fur Gynakol. 19, 409, (1895).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Cruickshank, and A. Sharman. The biology of the vagina in the human subject. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Br. Emp. 41, 208, (1934).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K.K. Holmes, C. Spiegel, R. Amsel, D.A. Eschenbach, K.C.S. Chen, and P. Totten. Nonspecific vaginosis. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl. 26, 110, (1981).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.L. Gardner, and C.D. Dukes Hemophilus vaginalis vaginitis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 69, 962, (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T.A. Pheifer, P.S. Forsyth, M.A. Durfee, H.M. Pollock, and K.K. Holmes. Nonspecific vaginitis: Role of Haemophilus vaginalis and treatment with metronidazole. Engl. J. Med. 298, 1429, (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Amsel, P.A. Totten, C.A. Spiegel, K.C.S. Chen, D. Eschenbach, and K.K. Holmes. Nonspecific vaginitis: Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 74, 14, (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Leopold. Heretofore undescribed organism isolated from genitourinary system. U.S. Armed Forces Med. J. 4, 263, (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Piot, E. Van Dyck, M. Goodfellow, and S. Falkow. A taxonomie study of Gardnerella vaginalis (Haemophilus vaginalis) Gardner and Dukes. J. Gen. Microbiol. 119, 373, (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.R. Greenwood, and M.J. Pickett. Transfer of Haemophilus vaginalis Gardner and Dukes to a new genus, Gardnerella (Gardner and Dukes) comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacterid. 30, 170, (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W.M. McCormack, C.H. Hayes, B. Rosner, J.R. Evrard, V.A Crockett, S. Alpert, and S.H. Zinner. Vaginal colonization with Corynebacterium vaginale (Haemophilus vaginalis). J. Infect. Dis. 136, 740, (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.A. Totten, R. Amsel, J. Hale, P. Piot, and K.K. Holmes. Selective differential human blood bilayer media for isolation of Gardnerella (Haemophilus) vaginalis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 15, 141, (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K.C.S. Chen, P.S. Forsyth, T.M. Buchanan, and K.K. Holmes. Biochemical aspects of nonspecific vaginitis: Amine content of vaginal fluid from untreated patients. J. Clin. Invest. 63, 828, (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K.C.S. Chen, R. Amsel, D.A. Eschenbach, and K.K. Holmes. Biochemical diagnosis of vaginitis: Determination of diamines in vaginal fluid. J. Infect. Dis. 145, 337, (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C.A. Spiegel, R. Amsel, D. Eschenbach, F. Schoenknecht, and K.K. Holmes. Anaerobic bacteria in nonspecific vaginitis, N. Engl. J. Med. 303, 601, (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Taylor, A.L. Blackwell, D. Barlow, and I. Phillips. Gardnerella vaginalis, anaerobes, and vaginal discharge. Lancet, i, 1376, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.L. Blackwell, A.R. Fox, I. Phillips, and D. Barlow. Anaerobic vaginosis (non-specific vaginitis): Clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic findings. Lancet. ii, 1379, (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C.A. Spiegel, R. Amsel, and K.K. Holmes. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct Gram stain of vaginal fluid. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18, 170, (1983).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C.A. Spiegel, D.A. Eschenbach, R. Amsel, and K.K. Holmes- Curved anaerobic bacteria in bacterial (nonspecific) vaginosis and their response to antimicrobial therapy. J. Infect. Dis. 148, 817, (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.L. Thomason, P.C. Schreckenberger, W.N. Spellacy, L.J. Riff, and L.J. LeBeau. Clinical and microbiological characterization of patients with nonspecific vaginosis associated with motile, curved anaerobic rods. J. Infect. Dis. 149, 801, (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.H. Curtis. A motile curved anaerobic bacillus in uterine discharges. J. Infect. Pis. 12, 165, (1913).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. Moore. Observations on a group of anaerobic vaginal vibrios. J. Path. Bact. 67, 461, (1954).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Durieux, and A. Dublanchet. Les “Vibrions” anerobies des leucorrhees. Technique d’isolement et sensibilite aux antibiotiques. Med. Mal. Infect. 10, 109, (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Pahlson, V. Forsum, A. Hallen, E. Hjelm, and J. Wallin. Characterization of motile anaerobic curved rods isolated from women with lower genital tract infection in three different countries. Eur. J. Sex. Trans. Pis. 1, 73, (1983).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Skarin, E. Hoist, and P.-A. Mardh. Antimicrobial susceptibility of comma-shaped bacteria isolated from the vagina. Scand. J. Infect. Pis. Suppl. 40, 81, (1983).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M.S. Sprott, H.R. Ingham, R.S. Pattman, R.L. Eisenstadt, G.R. Short, H.K. Narang, P.R. Sisson, and J.B. Selkon. Characteristics of motile curved rods in vaginal secretions. J. Med. Microbiol. 16, 175, (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    C.A. Spiegel, and M. Roberts, Mobiluncus gen. nov., Mobiluncus curtisii subspecies curtisii sp. nov., Mobiluncus curtisii subspecies holmesii subsp. nov., and Mobiluncus mulieris sp. nov., curved rods from the human vagina. Int. J. System Bacterid. 34, 177, (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. Hammann, A. Kronibus, A. Viebahn, and H. Brandis, Falcivibrio grandis gen. nov. sp. nov. and Falcivibrio vaginalis gen. nov. sp. nov., a new genus and species to accommodate anaerobic motile curved rods formerly described as “Vibrio mulieris” (Prevot 1940) Breed et al. 1948. System Appl. Microbiol. 5, 81, (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. Amsel, C.W. Critchlow, C.A. Spiegel, K.C.S. Chen, D. Eschenbach, K. Smith, and K.K. Holmes. Comparison of metronidazole, ampicillin, and amoxicillin for treatment of bacterial vaginosis (nonspecific vaginitis): Possible explanation for the greater efficacy of metronidazole. In U.S. Metronidazole Conference, Proceedings from a Symposium, (S.M. Finegold ed.), p. 225. Biomedical Information Corporation, New York, (1982).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    P. Piot, E. Van Pyck, M. Peeters, J. Hale, P.A. Totten, and K.K. Holmes. Biotypes of Gardnerella vaginalis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 20, 677, (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    P.-A. Mardh, and S. Svensson. Hemagglutination by vaginal anaerobic curved rods and its inhibition by oligosaccharides. In Bacterial vaginosis, (P.-A. Mardh and D. Taylor-Robinson ed.)., Almqvist & Wiskell International, Stockholm, 179, (1984).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    B. Fredericsson, A.-K. Moller, and C.E. Nord. Can Gardnerella vaginalis and anaerobic curved rods attach to vaginal epithelial cells in vitro, resulting in clue cells. In Bacterial vaginosis, (P.-A. Mardh and P. Taylor-Robinson ed.), Almqvist & Wiskell International, Stockholm, 195, (1984).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    H. Moi, P. Panielsson, and F. Schoenknecht. An in vitro study of the attachment to vaginal epithelial cells and anaerobic curved rods, Bacteriodes bivius and Bacterioides disiens. In Bacterial vaginosis, (P.-A. Mardh and P. Taylor-Robinson ed.), Almqvist & Wiskell International, Stockholm, 185, (1984).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    C.A. Ison, and C.S.F. Easmon. Studies on the mechanism of adhesion of Gardnerella vaginalis to human erythrocytes. In Bacterial vaginosis, (P.-A., Mardh and P. Taylor-Robinson ed.), Almqvist & Wiskell International, Stockholm, 191, (1984).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    A.P. Johnson, C.A. Ison, C.M. Hetherington, M.F. Osborn, G. Southerton, W.T. London, C.S.F. Easmon, and P. Taylor-Robinson. Vaginal colonization of pig-tailed macaques by Gardnerella vaginalis. In Bacterial vaginosis, (P.-A. Mardh and P. Taylor-Robinson ed). Almqvist & Wiskell International, Stockholm, 207, (1984).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    P.-A. Mardh, E, Hoist, and B.R. Moller. The grivet monkey as a model for study of vaginitis. Challenge with anaerobic curved rods and Gardnerella vaginalis. In Bacterial vaginosis, (P.-A. Mardh and P. Taylor-Robinson ed.). Almqvist & Wiskell International, Stockholm, 201, (1984).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    C.E. Nord and B. Olsson-Liljequist. Resistance to -lactam antibiotics in Bacteroides species. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 8 Suppl. D, 33, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    E.D. Ralph, and Y.E. Amatnieks. Relative susceptibilities of Gardnerella vaginalis (Haemophilus vaginalis), Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Bacteroides fragilis to metronidazole and its two major metabolites. Sex. Trans. Dis. 1, 157, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol A. Spiegel
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical MicrobiologyUniversity of Wisconsin Hospital and ClinicsMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations