A Computer Model Of Music Recognition

  • Martin Piszczalski
  • Bernard A. Galler


Human-like recognition of sounds by computer is an important element in the overall effort to make computers more interactive and communi-cative with the outside world. In a typical application sound is first con­verted into the required digital form for computer processing. Next, the digitized sound waves are automatically analyzed by special computer programs to identify the contents of the sounds. These analysis programs can therefore produce data suitable for later general-purpose digital computer programs that do not know or care that the input data was originally in sound form.


Automatic Speech Recognition Musical Note Automatic Speech Recognition System Human Hearing Natural Sound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Askenfelt, A., 1976, Automatic notation of played music (status report), Quart. Prog, and Status Rep., Speech Transmission Laboratory, Royal Inst, of Technol., Stockholm, 1–11.Google Scholar
  2. Cann, R., 1979, An analysis-synthesis tutorial, Computer Mus. J., 3(4):9–13.Google Scholar
  3. Grey, J.M., and Moorer, J.A., 1977, Perceptual evaluation of synthesized musical instrument tones, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 62:454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Klatt, D.H., 1979, Speech perception: a model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access, J. Phon., 7:279–312.Google Scholar
  5. Lesser, V.R., Fennell, R.D., Er man L.D., and Reddy, D.R., 1974,Organization of the HEARSAY II speech understanding system, IEEE Symp. Speech Recog., 11–21, April 1974.Google Scholar
  6. Luce, D.A., 1963, “Physical Correlates of Nonpercussive Musical Instrument Tones,” Ph.D. Thesis, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Milano, D., 1979, Wendy Carlos, Contemporary Keyboard, 5:62Google Scholar
  8. Moorer, J.A., 1973, “On-the-Segmentation and Analysis of Sound by Digital Computer,” Ph.D Thesis, Stanford University, dist. as Dept. of Music Rep. Stan-M-3.Google Scholar
  9. Petersen, T.L., 1976, Composing with cross-synthesis, 1st Int. Conf. on Computer Mus., M.I.T.Google Scholar
  10. Pickett, J.M., 1979, Speech aids for the handicapped, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 63.Suppl.l:s 36.Google Scholar
  11. Piszczalski, M.B., and Galler, B.A., 1979, Computer analysis and transcription of performed music: a project report, Computers and the Humanities: 13:195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Piszczalski, M B., and Galler, B.A., 1979, Automatic tone identification in continuously played music, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 65. Suppl. I:s l23 (abs.).Google Scholar
  13. Piszczalski, M B., and Galler, B.A., Bossemeyer, R., Hatamian, M., and Looft, F., 1979, Performed music: analysis, synthesis and display by computer, 64th Audi o Eng. Soc. Conv., November, 1979, Preprint 1536 (3–2).Google Scholar
  14. Piszczalski, M.B., and Galler, B.A., 1979, Predicting musical pitch from component ratios, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 66(3):710–720,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Robinson, A.L., 1979, More people are talking to computers as speech recognition enters the real world. Science: 16:634–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schroeder, M.R., 1973, Models of hearing, Proc. IEEE: 63(9):1332–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tucker, W.H.J., et al., 1977, An interactive aid for musicians. Int. J. Man-machine Studies, 9:633–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Whitfield, I.C., 1967, “The Auditory Pathways,” Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  19. Zatorre, R.J., and Halpern, A.R., 1979, Identification, discrimination and selective adaptation of simultaneous musical intervals, Perc. and Psychophys. 26(3):384–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zwicker, E., Terhardt, E., and Paulus, E., 1979, Automatic speech recognition using psychoacoustic models, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 63(2):487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Piszczalski
    • 1
  • Bernard A. Galler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Communication SciencesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations