Two Channel Pitch Perception

  • Leon van Noorden


Physiological experiments show that information about frequency of tones is coded in two distinct ways in the auditory nerve. Nerve spikes can be distinguished as to when and where (in which nerve fiber) they occur. It is an old question whether the time or the place information plays a role in pitch perception.


Pure Tone Auditory Nerve Basilar Membrane Complex Tone Absolute Pitch 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Attneave, F., 1959, “Application of information theory to psychology,” Holt, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Attneave, F., and Olson R.K., 1971, Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling. Am. J. Psychol., 84:147–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachem, A., 1973, Various types of absolute pitch, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 9:146–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bachem, A., 1950, Tone Height and Tone Chroma as two differnt pitch qualities. Acta Psychologica, 7:80–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bachem, A., 1954, Time factors in relative and absolute pitch determination, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 26:751–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, J., and Shaw, W.A., 1961, The scaling of pitch. Am. J. Psychol., 74:242–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bismarck, G. von, 1974, Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady sounds, Acustica, 30:159–172.Google Scholar
  8. Boer, E. de, 1956, “On the residue in hearing,” Academic thesis, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  9. Boer, E. de, 1977, Pitch theories unified, in: “Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing,” E.F. Evans, and J.P. Wilson eds., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  10. Brink, G. van den, 1970, Experiments on binaural diplacusis and tone perception, in: “Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing,” R. Plomp, and G.F. Smoorenburg, eds., Sythoff, Leiden.Google Scholar
  11. Brink, G. van den, 1975, The relation between binaural diplacusis for pure tones and complex sounds under normal conditons and with induced monaural pitch shift, Acustica, 32:159–165.Google Scholar
  12. Burns, E.M., and Viewmeister, N.F., 1976, Nonspectral pitch, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 60:863–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll, J.B., 1975, Speed and accuracy of absolute pitch judgments; some latter day results, Res. Bull., Educational Testing Service, Princeton.Google Scholar
  14. Carvellas, J., and Schneider, B., 1972, Direct estimation of multidimensional tonal dissimilarity, J.Acoust. Soc, Am., 54:1839–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drobisch, M.W., 1833, Abh. and Math. Phys, Köni, Sachs. Ges. Wiss. 4:1–120.Google Scholar
  16. Duifhuis, H., 1972, “Perceptual Analysis of Sound,” Thesis, University of Technology, Eindhoven.Google Scholar
  17. Fulgosi, A. and Zaja, B., 1975, Information transmission of 3.1 bits in absolute identification of auditory pitch. Bull. Psychonomic Soc., 6:379–380.Google Scholar
  18. Fullard, W., Snelbecker, G.F., and Wolk, S., 1972, Absolute judgments as a function of stimulus uncertainty and temporal effects: Methodological note, Perc. and Motor Skills, 34:379–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garner, W.R., 1962, “Uncertainty and Structure as Psychological Concepts,” Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Garner, W.R., 1972, “The Processing of Information and Structure,” Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Goldstein, J.L., 1973, An optinum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 54:1496–1516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldstein, J.L., and Kiang, N.Y.S., 1968, Neural correlates of the aural combination tone 2fl-f2, Proc. IEEE, 56:981–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldstein, J.L., and Srulovicz, P., 1977, Auditory nerve spike intervals as an adequate basis for aura frequency measurement, in: “Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing,” E.F. Evans, and J.P. Wilson, eds.. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  24. Harris, J.D., 1960, The scaling of pitch intervals, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32:1575–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Houtgast, T., 1976, Subharmonic pitches of a pure tone at low S/N ratio, “J. Acoust. Soc. Am”., 60:405–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Houtsma, A.J.M., and Goldstein, J.L., 1972, The central origin of the pitch of complex tones: Evidence from musical interval recognition, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 41:520–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Houtsma, A.J.M., Wicke, R.W., and Ordubadi, A., 1980, Pitch of amplitude-modulated low-pass noise and predictions by temporal and spectral theories, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 67:1312–1322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Javel, E., 1972, “A Nurophysiological Investigation of Single Unit Responses to Some Periodic Complex Auditory Stimuli,” Doctoral Thesis, University of Pittsburg.Google Scholar
  29. Licklider, J.C.R., 1951, A Duplex theory of pitch perception, Experientia, 7:128–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Licklider, J.C.R., 1955, Auditory fequency analysis, in: “Proc. Third London Symposimum on Information Theory,” C. Cherry, ed., Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
  31. Marks, L.E., 1974, “Sensory Processes (The New Psychophysics)”, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, G.A., 1956, The magical number seven, plus or minus two, Psychol., 53:81–97.Google Scholar
  33. Moore, B.C.J., 1973, “Some experience relating to the perception of complex tones,” Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 25:451–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moore, B.C.J., 1977, Effects of relative phase of the components on the pitch of three-component complex tones, in “Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing,” E.F. Evans, and J.P. Wilson, eds., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  35. Oghushi, K., 1978, On the role of spatial and temporal cues in the perception of the pitch of complex tones, Jv Acoust, Soc. Am., 64:764–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parker, S., and Schneider, B., 1974, Nonmetric scaling of loudness and pitch using similarity and difference estimates, Perc. and Psychophys., 15:238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patterson, R.D., and Wightman, F.L., 1976, Residue Pitch as a function of component spacing, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 59:1450–1459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Plomp, R., 1967a, Beats of mistuned consonants, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 42:462–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Plomp, R., 1967b, Pitch of complex tones, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 41:1526–1533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Plomp, R., and Steeneken, H.J.M., 1971, Pitch versus timbre, Proc. 7th Int. Cong. Acoust., Budapest, 3:377–380.Google Scholar
  41. Plomp, R., 1976, “Aspects of Tone Sensation,” Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  42. Pollack, J., 1952, The information of elementary auditory displays, I, J. Acoust. Soc Am., 24:245–249.Google Scholar
  43. Pollack, J., 1953, The information of elementary auditory displays, II, J. Acoust. Soc Am., 25:765–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Revesz, G., 1913, “Zur Grundlegung der Tonpsychologie,” Veit and Company, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  45. Ritsma, R.J., 1962, Existence region of the total residue I, J. Acoust. Soc 34; 1224–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ritsma, R.J., 1966, The ‘Octave Deafness’ of the human ear, IPO Annual Prog. Rep., 1:15–17.Google Scholar
  47. Ritsma, R.J., 1967, Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch complex sounds, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 48:191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ritsma, R.J., 1970, Periodicity detention, in: “Frequency and Periodicity Detection in Hearing,” R. Plomp and G.F. Smoorenburg, eds., Sijthoss, Leiden.Google Scholar
  49. Rose, J.E., Brugge, J.F., Anderson, D.J., and Hind, J.E., 1967, Phase-locked resonses to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey, J. Neurophysiol., 29:769–793.Google Scholar
  50. Schouten, J.F., 1938, The perception of subjective tones, Proc. Kon. Acad. Wetensch., 41:1086–1094.Google Scholar
  51. Schouten, J.F., 1940a, The residue, a new component in subjective sound analysis, Proc. Kon. Acad. Wetensch., 43:356–365.Google Scholar
  52. Schouten, J.F., 1940b, The residue and the mechanism of hearing, Proc. Kon. Acad. Wetensch., 43:991–999.Google Scholar
  53. Schouten, J.F., Ritsma, R.J., and Cardozo, B.L., 1962, Pitch of the residue J.Acoust. Soc. Am., 34:1418–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schroeder, M.R., and Hall, J.L., 1974 Model for mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor, J.Acoust. Soc. Am., 55:1055–1060.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Siegel, J.A. 1972, The nature of absolute pitch, in: “Studies in the Psychology of Music,” Vol. 8, I.E. Gordon, ed., University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.Google Scholar
  56. Siegel, J.A., 1974, Sensory and verbal coding strategies in subject with absolute pitch, J. Exp. Psychol., 103:37–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Siegel, R.J., 1965, A replication of the mel-scale of pitch. Am. J. Psych., 615–620.Google Scholar
  58. Smoorenburg, G.F., 1970, Pitch perception of two frequency stimuli, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 48:924–942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stanaway, R.G., Morley, T., and Anstis, S.M., 1970, Tinnitus not a reference signal in judgments of absolute pitch, Quart. J. Exp. Psych., 22:230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stevens, S.S., Volkmann, J., and Newman, E.B., 1937, A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude of pitch, J. Acoust. Soc. 8:185 190.Google Scholar
  61. Stevens, S.S., Volkmann, J., 1940, The relation of pitch to frequency: A revised scale. Am. J. Psych., 33:329–353.Google Scholar
  62. Terhardt, E, 1974, Pitch, consonance and harmony, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 55:1061–1069.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Terhardt, E., 1976, Ein Psychoakustisch begründetes Konzept der Musikalischen Konsonanz, Acustica, 36:121–137.Google Scholar
  64. Ward, W D., 1953, Informaton and absolute pitch, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 25:833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whitfield, I.C., 1967, “The Auditory Pathway,” Monographs of the Physiological Soc., Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  66. Wightman, F.L., 1973a, The pattern-transformation model or pitch, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 54:407–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wightman, F.L., 1973b, Pitch and stimulus fine structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 53:417–426.Google Scholar
  68. Zwicker, E., and Feldtkeller, R., 1967, “Das Ohr Als Nachrichtenempfänger,” Hirzel, Stuttgart, 2nd ed.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leon van Noorden
    • 1
  1. 1.Association for the Blind in the NetherlandsRotterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations