Advertisement

Affective Versus Analytic Perception of Musical Intervals

  • Scott Makeig

Abstract

When I see an apple, what do I experience? Of course I see it at a certain place in space, and of a certain size — both with respect to my body, and with respect to other things in its environment. But at the same time, I see and experience some of its qualities — its shape, its color, etc. And from these, I may get an imagination of its taste.

Keywords

Affective Experience Analytic Perception Pitch Perception Music Theory Pitch Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bake, A., 1957, Review of Daniélou, Traité de musicologie comparée,’ Ethnomusicology, 5(3):231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balzano, G.J., 1978, “Higher-order Attributes and the Perception of Musical Intervals,” Paper presented at the Research Symposium on the Cognitive Structure of Musical Pitch.Google Scholar
  3. Beament, J., 1977, The biology of music. Psych, of Music, 5(1):1.Google Scholar
  4. Boer, E. de, 1976, On the ‘residue’ and auditory pitch perception, in “Handbook of Sensory Physiology,” W.D. Keidel, and W.D. Neff, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Boomsliter, P., and Creel, W., 1961, The long-pattern hypothesis in harmony and hearing, J. Mus. Theory, 5:3–31.Google Scholar
  6. Boomsliter, P., and Creel, W., 1963, Extended reference — an unrecognized dynamic in melody, J. Mus. Theory, 7:2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Briscoe, R.L., 1975, “Rameau’s ‘Démonstration du principle de Tharmonie (1750),” Ph.D. diss., University of Indiana.Google Scholar
  8. Brust, J.C.M., 1980, Music and language: Musical alexia and agraphia, Brain, 103:367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budden, F., 1972, “The fascination of Groups,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Eng.Google Scholar
  10. Chalmers, J., ed., 1973, Xenharmonikon: An Informal Journal of Experimental Music, Houston.Google Scholar
  11. Chapman, R.M., McCrary, J.W., Chapman, J.A., and Martin, J.K., 1980, Behavioral and neural analyses of connotative meaning: word classes and rating scales, Brain and Lang., 11:319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clynes, M., 1977, “Sentics: The Touch of Emotions,” Doubleday/Anchor Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Clynes, M., 1980, The communication of emotion: theory of sentics, in “Theories of Emotion,” R. Plutchik, and H. Kellerman, eds., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Darreg, I., 1975, New moods, Xenharmonic bulletin No. 5, Xenharmonikon Google Scholar
  15. Daniélou, A., 1967, “Semantique musicale,” Hermann, Paris. (2nd ed. 1978).Google Scholar
  16. Ermentrout, and Cowan, 1979, A mathematical theory of visual hallucination and patterns, Biol, Cybern., 34:137.Google Scholar
  17. Evans, E.F., 1978, Place and time coding of frequency in the peripheral auditory system: some physiological pros and cons, Audiol., 17:369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldstein, J.L., 1978, Mechanisms of signal analysis and pattern perception in periodicity pitch, Audiol, 17:421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gordon, H.W., 1978, Hemispheric asymmetry for dichotically-presented chords in musicians and non-musicians, males and females. Acta Psych., 42:383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gut, S., 1976, La notion de consonance chez les theoriciens du moyen age. Acta Musico., 48:20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagerman, B., and Sundberg, J., 1980, Fundamental frequency adjustment in barbershop singing, Quart. Prog. & Stat. Report, Apr: 28–42. Speech Transmission Lab., Royal Inst. Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  22. Helmholtz, H.L.F. von, 1862, “On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music,” Peter Smith, New York (1948).Google Scholar
  23. Hindemith, P., 1945, “The Craft of Musical Composition,” Book I, (4th ed.), Schott, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Jairazbhoy, N.A., 1971, “The Rags of North Indian Music: Their Structured Evolution, Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Conn.Google Scholar
  25. Kilmer, A., Crocker, R., and Brown, D., 1976, “Sounds from Silence: Recent Discoveries in Ancient Near Eastern Music, Bit Enki Productions, Berkeley, Calif. (Booklet and long-playing record.)Google Scholar
  26. Krumhansl, C., 1979, The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context, Cog. Psych., 11:346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kunst-Wilson, W., and Zajonc, R.B., 1980, Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207:557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Longuet-Higgins, H.C., 1978, The perception of music, Interdisc. Sci. News, 3:148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Makeig, S., 1979, “Expressive Tuning: The Theory of Interval Affect,” Master’s thesis. University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  30. Makeig, S., 1979, The affects of musical intervals (Part 1), Interval, 2(1):18.Google Scholar
  31. Makeig, S., 1980, The affects of musical intervals (Part 2), Interval, 2(2):23.Google Scholar
  32. Makeig, S., and Evans, J., 1980, “Pilot Study Summary of a Projected Test of Interval Affect,” paper presented to S. Carolina chapter, American Psychology Association meeting. Myrtle Beach, S. Carolina.Google Scholar
  33. Makeig, S., 1980, The theory of tone-groups (unpublished).Google Scholar
  34. Makeig, S., 1980, “On Fokker’s Chinese Bells” (unpublished).Google Scholar
  35. Makeig, S., 1981, Means, meaning, and music: Pythagoras, Archytas, and Plato, ex tempore, l (l):36–62.Google Scholar
  36. Meher Baba, 1955, “God Speaks: The Theme of Creation and Its Purpose,” Dodd, Mead, New York (2nd ed., 1973).Google Scholar
  37. Meyer, M.F., 1929, The musician’s arithmetic, in “The University of Missouri Studies,” 6(1):5.Google Scholar
  38. Meyers, C., 1927, Individual differences in musical perception, in “The Effects of Music,” M. Shoen, ed., Harcourt-Brace, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Moore, B.C.J., 1980, Neural interspike intervals and pitch, Audiol., 19:363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Osgood, C.E., 1971, Exploration in semantic space: a personal diary, J. of Soc. Iss., 27(4):3.Google Scholar
  41. Osgood, C.E., Suci, F.J., and Tannebaum, P.H., 1957, “The Measurement of Meaning,” University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.Google Scholar
  42. Peretz, I., and Morais, J., 1980, Modes of processing melodies and ear asymmetry in non-musicians, Neuropsych., 18:477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Polzella, D.J., DaPolito, F., and Hussman, M.C., 1977, Cerebral asymmetry in time perception, Perc. and Psychophys., 21(2): 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pribram, K.H., 1978, Modes of central processing in human learning, in “Brain and Learning,” Greylock, Stamford, Conn.Google Scholar
  45. Shannon, B., 1980, Lateralization effects in musical decision tasks, Neuropsych., 18:21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shepard, R.N., 1979, Individual differences in the perception of musical pitch, in “Perceptual Organization,” M. Kubovy, and J.R. Pomerantz, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.3.Google Scholar
  47. Shepard, R.N., (1978), The circumplex and related topological manifolds in the study of perception, in “Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences,” S. Shye, ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  48. Shepard, R.N., in press. Structural representations of musical pitch, in “Psychology of Music”, D. Deutsch, ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Sidtis, J.J., 1980, On the nature of the cortical function underlying right hemisphere auditory perception, Neuropsych., 18:321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Siegel, J.A., and Siegel, W., 1977, Categorical perception — musicians can’t tell sharp from flat, Perc. and Psychophys., 21:399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, J., and Tallal, P., 1980, Rate of acoustic change may underline hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Science, 207:1380–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tanner, R., 1971, Le phénomène d’identification par tolerance; le prejuge de la gamme juste, Acustica, 25:158.Google Scholar
  53. Tanner, R., 1972, Le problême des deux tierces (Pythagore ou Zarlino): Sa solution psycharithmetique, Acustica, 27:335.Google Scholar
  54. Tanner, R., 1972, La differenciation qualitative des psycharithmes et des intervalles musicaux. Rev. Mus., Num. Spec.Google Scholar
  55. Tanner, R., 1976, La fonction et la just esse melodiques des intervalles, Acustica, 34(5):259.Google Scholar
  56. Terhardt, E., 1974, Pitch, consonance, and harmony, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 54:1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Terhardt, E., 1977, The two-component theory of musical consonance, “Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing,” E.F. Evans, and J.P. Wilson, eds., Acadmic Press, London.Google Scholar
  58. Ward, W.D., 1970, Musical perception, 4 “Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory,” J.V. Tobias, ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  59. Winfree, A.T., 1980, “The Geometry of Biological Time,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Makeig
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California at San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations