Advertisement

Mössbauer Spectroscopy and Physical Metallurgy

  • U. Gonser

Abstract

A decade ago Rudolf Mössbauer [1,2] observed that the emission and absorption of gamma rays can occur in a recoil-free fashion. This discovery led to a new scientific tool—the Mössbauer effect. The wide applicability of the Mössbauer effect has had a great impact on many disciplines in natural sciences over the last decade, including physical metallurgy. One might point out that the gain in information was not always a one-way street. The two fields of nuclear physics and metallurgy especially played a significant role in the development and application of Mössbauer spectroscopy. Knowledge of nuclear physics parameters, such as nuclear moments, were important in the understanding of the hyperfine pattern, and physical metallurgy considerations contributed to various practical aspects of this new technique.

Keywords

Isomer Shift Internal Oxidation Physical Metallurgy Stainless Steel Sample M6ssbauer Spectrum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. L. Mössbauer, Z. Physik 151, 124 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. L. Mössbauer, Naturwiss. 45, 538 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. H. Muir, Jr., K. J. Ando, and H. M. Coogan, Mössbauer Effect Data Index, 1958–1965 (Interscience, New York, 1966).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Frauenfelder, The Mössbauer Effect (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1962).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Hansen and K. Anderko, Constitution of Binary Alloys (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    U. Gonser, R. W. Grant, A. H. Muir, Jr., and H. Wiedersich, Acta Met. 14, 259 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    U. Gonser, C. J. Meechan, A. H. Muir, Jr., and H. Wiedersich, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 2373 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Ron, A. Rosencwaig, H. Shechter, and A. Kidron, Phys. Letters 22, 44 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. M. Housley, U. Gonser, and R. W. Grant, Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 1279 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Nagarajan and P. A. Flinn, Appl. Phys. Letters 11, 120 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. W. T. Chandler (Rocketdyne Division, North American Rockwell Corporation), G. Martin (Los Angeles Division, North American Rockwell Corporation), U. Gonser, R. W. Grant, R. M. Housley, A. H. Muir, Jr., and H. Wiedersich (Science Center, North American Rockwell Corporation), unpublished observations.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Shirane, D. E. Cox, and S. L. Ruby, Phys. Rev. 125, 1158 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Bauminger, S. G. Cohen, A. Marinov, S. Ofer, and E. Segal, Phys. Rev. 122, 1447 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Ono, Y. Ishikawa, A. Ito, and E. Hirahara, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 17, Suppl. B-1, 125 (1962).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. H. Muir, Jr. and H. Wiedersich, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 28, 65 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. J. Borg, R. Booth, and C. E. Violet, Phys. Rev. Letters 11, 464 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    U. Gonser, R. W. Grant, C. J. Meechan, A. H. Muir, Jr., and H. Wiedersich, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 2124 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. P. Craig and W. A. Steyert, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 802 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. W. Grant, H. Wiedersich, and U. Gonser, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 10, 708 (1965).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. B. Stearns, J. Appl. Phys. 35, 1095 (1964); ibid. 36, 913 (1965); Phys. Rev. 147, 439 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. A. Flinn and S. L. Ruby, Phys. Rev. 124, 34 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. E. Johnson, M. S. Ridout, and T. E. Cranshaw, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 81, 1079 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    G. Shirane, C. W. Chen, P. A. Flinn, and R. Nathans, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1044 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. K. Wertheim, V. Jaccarino, J. H. Wernick, and D. N. E. Buchanan, Phys. Rev. Letters 12, 24 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. Ohta, J. Appl Phys. 39, 2123 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    H. L. Marcus, M. E. Fine, and L. H. Schwartz, J. Appl. Phys. 38, 4750 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Cohen, Trans. AIME 224, 638 (1962).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. M. Gielen and R. Kaplow, Acta Met. 15, 49 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. Moriya, H. Ino, F. E. Fujita, and Y. Maeda, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 24, 60 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. M. Genin and P. A. Flinn, Trans. AIME 242, 1419 (1968).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Ino, T. Moriya, F. E. Fujita, Y. Maeda, Y. Ono, and Y. Inokuti, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 25, 88 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    T. Shinjo, F. Itoh, H. Takaki, Y. Nakamura, and N. Shikazono, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 19, 1252 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Ron, H. Shechter, A. A. Hirsch, and S. Niedzwiedz, Phys. Letters 20, 481 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. M. Genin and P. A. Flinn, Phys. Letters 22, 392 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    H. Marcus, L. H. Schwartz, and M. E. Fine, Trans. ASM 59, 468 (1966).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Bernas, I. A. Campbell, and R. Fruchard, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 28, 17 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    P. M. Gielen and R. Kaplow, Acta Met. 15, 49 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    B. W. Christ and P. M. Giles, Mössbauer Effect Methodology, Vol. 3 (Plenum Press, New York, 1967), p. 37.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    E. F. Makarov, V. A. Povitskii, E. B. Granovskii, and A. A. Fridman, Phys. Status Solidi 24, 45 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. Ron, A. Kidron, H. Shechter, and S. Niedzwiedz, J. Appl Phys. 38, 590 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Ron, H. Shechter, and S. Niedzwiedz, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 265 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    G. K. Wertheim and J. H. Wernick, Acta Met. 15, 297 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    G. P. Huffman and R. M. Fisher, J. Appl. Phys. 38, 735 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    R. Nathans, M. T. Pigott, and C. G. Shull, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 6, 38 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    K. Ono, Y. Ishikawa, and A. Ito, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 17, 1747 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    M. B. Stearns, Phys. Rev. 168, 588 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    L. Cser, J. Ostanevich, and L. Päl, Phys. Status Solidi 20, 581 (1967); 20, 591 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    G. Shirane, C. W. Chen, P. A. Flinn, and R. Nathans, Phys. Rev. 131, 183 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    C. E. Violet and E. L. Lee, Mössbauer Effect Methodology, Vol. 2 (Plenum Press, New York, 1966), p. 171.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    L. Néel, Compt. Rend. 228, 604 (1949).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    U. Gonser, H. Wiedersich, and R. W. Grant, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 1004 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    S. Nasu, T. Shinjo, Y. Nakamura, and Y. Murakami, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 23, 664 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    A. H. Muir, Mössbauer Effect Methodology, Vol. 4, (Plenum Press, New York, 1968), p. 75.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    A. H. Muir, A. C. Micheletti, and M. Blander, Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society, Moffett, Calif., 1967.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    E. L. Sprenkel-Segel and S. S. Hanna, Mössbauer Effect Methodology, Vol. 2 (Plenum Press, New York, 1966), p. 113.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    P. Imbert, J. Phys. 27, 429 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    R. M. Housley and U. Gonser, Phys. Rev. 171, 480 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    M. Blume and O. C. Kistner, Phys. Rev. 171, 417 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    R. H. Herber, Mössbauer Effect Methodology, Vol. 1 (Plenum Press, New York, 1965), p. 3.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    National Bureau of Standards, Standard Reference Material 725 for Mössbauer Differential Chemical Shift for Iron-57 (see also J. J. Spijkerman, D. K. Snediker, F. C. Ruegg, and J. R. DeVoe, NBS Misc. Publ. 260–13).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    G. Czjzek, J. L. C. Ford, J. C. Love, F. E. Obenshain, and H. F. Wegener, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 529 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    G. D. Sprouse, G. M. Kalvius, and S. S. Hanna, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 1041 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Y. K. Lee, P. W. Keaton, Jr., E. T. Ritter, and J. C. Walker, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 957 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    D. Seyboth, F. E. Obenshain, and G. Czjzek, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 954 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    S. L. Ruby and R. E. Holland, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 591 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    D. W. Hafemeister and E. B. Shera, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 593 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    G. K. Wertheim and H. J. Guggenheim, J. Chem. Phys. 42, 3873 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    W. Trifthäuser and P. P. Craig, Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 1161 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    U. Gonser and H. Wiedersich, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 18, Suppl. II, 47 (1963).Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    J. A. Stone and W. L. Pillinger, Phys. Rev. Letters 13, 200 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    J. Stephen, Nucl. Instr. Methods 26, 269 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    R. E. DeWames, T. Wolfram, and G. W. Lehman, Phys. Rev. 131, 529 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    N. E. Alekseevskii, Pham Zuy Hien, V. G. Shapiro, and V. S. Shpinel’, Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 43, 790 (1962).Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    C. J. Meechan and A. H. Muir, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 438 (1964).Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    P. A. Flinn and S. L. Ruby, Rev. Mod Phys. 36, 352 (1964).Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    A. H. Muir and F. Boehm, Phys. Rev. 122, 1564 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    R. V. Pound and G. A. Rebka, Jr., Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 337 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    R. V. Pound and J. L. Snider, Phys. Rev. 140, 8788 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    S. G. Cohen, A. Marinov, and J. I. Budnick, Phys. Letters 12, 38 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    W. A. Steyert, R. D. Taylor, and E. K. Storms, Phys, Rev, Letters 14, 739 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    A. H. Muir, personal communication.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    C. Sauer, Z. Physik, 222, 439 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Gonser
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität des SaarlandesSaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations