Skip to main content

On Maintaining and Reasoning with Incomplete Information

  • Chapter
COMADEM 89 International
  • 126 Accesses

Abstract

Knowledge Based Systems (KBSs) are expected to maintain and reason with complete information. They also are expected to have a highly interactive and helpful interface. In this paper we make a first step towards a KBS that could meet such requirements. We present a Logic for Maintaining and Reasoning with incomplete information (thereafter LMR). Some of the advantages of LMR are that: (1) The semantic analysis is made in terms of possible situations, and (2) it supports constructive and informative user-system interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. De Kleer J., 1984, “An Assumption-Based TMS”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 24, pp. 127–162.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doyle J., 1979, “A Tmth Maintenance System”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 12, pp. 231–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gabbay D., 1983, “Intuitionistic Basis for Non-Monotonic Reasoning”, in: Proc. Conf. on Automated Deduction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McDermott D. and Doyle J., 1980, “Non-Monotonic Logic I”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 13, pp. 41–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McDermott D., 1982, “Non-Monotonic Logic II: Non-Monotonic Modal Theories”, JACM, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore R., 1983, “Semantical Consideration of Non-Monotonic Logic”, Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 272–279.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Obeid N., 1987, “A Model of Information Growth”, PhD. Thesis, Essex University.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Obeid N., 1988, “A Propositional Logic for Reasoning about Real-Time Situations”, IASTED International Conference on Expert Systems: Theory and Applications, pp. 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Obeid N., 1989, “Intuitionistic Versus Partial Models Basis for Commonsense Reasoning”, Submitted to: Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Raj B. K. N. Rao A. D. Hope

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kogan Page Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Obeid, N. (1989). On Maintaining and Reasoning with Incomplete Information. In: Rao, R.B.K.N., Hope, A.D. (eds) COMADEM 89 International. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8905-7_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8905-7_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8907-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8905-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics