Advertisement

Elements of Comparison between Electron-Nucleus and Nucleon-Nucleus Scattering

  • F. Petrovich

Abstract

The relationship between electron-nucleus scattering and nucleon-nucleus scattering is reviewed. Specific features of this relationship are used to obtain information on the effective interaction for nucleon-nucleus scattering. Emphasis is on the 100–200 MeV incident energy region which is currently being investigated experimentally at the Indiana University Cyclotron Facility. It is shown that a local t matrix interaction with central, spin-orbit, and tensor parts gives a good description of many features of the experimental data. Normal parity transitions of approximate isoscalar character (including elastic scattering), isovector dipole transitions in the (p,n) reaction, and transitions to high spin states of ‘stretched’ configuration are all discussed in some detail. The manner in which different parts of the interaction are manifested in the cross section is illustrated in the examples. Some new (π,π′) and proton analyzing power data for ‘stretched’ states in 28Si is discussed briefly.

Keywords

Elastic Scattering Matrix Interaction Transition Density Tensor Interaction Experimental Cross Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. Petrovich, “Microscopic Optical Potentials,” H. V. V. Geramb, ed., Springer-Verlag, New York (1979), 89:155 and references contained therein.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. G. Love, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. K. Kerman, H. McManus, and R. M. Thaler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 8: 551 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Petrovich, Nucl. Phys. A251: 143 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Petrovich and W. G. Love, to be published.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. de Forest, Jr. and J. D. Walecka, Adv. Phys. 15: 1 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Petrovich, H. McManus, J. Borysowicz, and G. R. Hammerstein, Phys. Rev. C16: 839 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. 55: 1 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Bertsch, J. Borysowicz, H. McManus, and W. G. Love, Nucl. Phys. A284: 399 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. G. Love and L. J. Parish, Nucl. Phys. A157: 625 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. G. Love, Nucl. Phys. A192: 49 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Petrovich, H. McManus, V. A. Madsen, and J. Atkinson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22: 895 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. G. Love, Nucl. Phys. A312: 160 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Raynal and R. Schaeffer, Computer code DWBA 70 as modified by W. G. Love.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. D. Myers and W. J. Swiatecki, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 55: 395 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. C. Halbert and G. R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A233: 265 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Scott, N. P. Mathur, and F. Petrovich, Nucl. Phys. A285: 222 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. G. Love, A. Scott, F. Todd Baker, W. P. Jones, and J. D. Wiggins, Jr., Phys. Lett. 73B: 277 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Picklesimer and G. Walker, Phys. Rev. C17: 237 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Schwandt, A. Nadasen, P. P. Singh, M. D. Kaitchuk, W. W. Jacobs, J. Meek, A. D. Bacher, and P. T. Debevec, “IUCF Technical and Scientific Report,”unpublished, p. 79 (19771978).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Nadasen, P. Schwandt, P. P. Singh, A. D. Bacher, P. T. Debevec, W. W. Jacobs, M. D. Kaitchuk, and J. T. Meek, submitted to Phys. Rev. C.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Schwandt, F. Petrovich, and A. Picklesimer, “IUCF Technical and Scientific Report,” unpublished, p. 27 (1978–1979).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Chamaux, V. Layly, and R. Schaeffer, Phys. Lett. 72B: 33 (1977).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Ray, G. W. Hoffmann, G. S. Blanpied, W. R. Coker, and R. P. Liljestrand, Phys. Rev. C18: 1756 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Ray, W. R. Coker, and G. W. Hoffmann, Phys. Rev. C18: 2641 (1978).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. S. Adams, A. D. Bacher, G. T. Emery, W. P. Jones, D. W. Miller, W. G. Love, and F. Petrovich, submitted to Phys. Lett.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. F. Ziegler and G. A. Peterson, Phys. Rev. 165: 1337 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. H. Heisenberg and I. Sick, Phys. Lett. 32B: 249 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Nagao and Y. Torizuka, Phys. Lett. 37B: 383 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Friedrich, K. Voegler, and H. Euteneuer, Phys. Lett. 64B: 269 (1976).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J. Lichtenstadt, J. Heisenberg, C. N. Papanicolas, C. P. Sargent, A. N. Courtemanche, and J. S. McCarthy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40: 1127 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    F. Petrovich, W. G. Love, G. S. Adams, A. D. Bacher, G. T. Emery, W. P. Jones, and D. W. Miller, submitted to Phys. Lett.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    B. D. Anderson, D. E. Bainum, A. Baldwin, C. C. Foster, C. D. Goodman, C. A. Goulding, M. B. Greenfield, J. N. Knudson, R. Madey, J. Rapaport, and T. R. Witten, “IUCF Technical and Scientific Report,” unpublished, p. 117 (1977–1978).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. D. Goodman, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    C. L. Moake, P. T. Debevec, L. J. Gutay, P. A. Quinn, and R. P. Scharenberg, “IUCF Scientific and Technical Report,” unpublished, p. 114 (1977–1978).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    B. T. Chertok, C. Sheffield, J. W. Lightbody, Jr., S. Penner, and D. Blum, Phys. Rev. C18: 23 (1973).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    L. W. Fagg, W. L. Bendel, R. A. Tobin, and H. T. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. 171: 1250 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    L. W. Fagg, W. L. Bendel, E. C. Jones, Jr., and S. Numrich, Phys. Rev. 187: 1378 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    F. Ajzenberg-Selove, Nucl. Phys. A248: 1 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    F. Petrovich, W. G. Love, and R. J. McCarthy, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    S. Cohen and D. Kurath, Nucl. Phys. 73: 11 (1965).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    W. Chung and B. H. Wildenthal, to be published.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, “Nuclear Structure, Benjamin, New York (1969) p. 345.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    J. D. Anderson, C. Wong, and V. A. Madsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24: 1074 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    F. Petrovich, R. H. Howell, S. M. Grimes, C. Wong, C. H. Poppe, G. M. Crawley, and S. M. Austin, to be published.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    R. H. Howell, F. S. Dietrich, D. W. Heikkinen, and F. Petrovich, to be published.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    H. V. Geramb, K. Amos, R. Sprichmann, K. T. Knöpfle, M. Rogge, D. Ingham, and C. Mayer-Böricke, Phys. Rev. C12: 1697 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    P. J. Moffa and G. E. Walker, Nucl. Phys. A222: 140 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    T. W. Donnelly, Jr., J. D. Walecka, I. Sick, and E. B. Hughes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21: 1196 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    L. W. Fagg, P. B. Ertel, H. Crannell, R. A. Lindgren, J. B. Flanz, and G. A. Peterson, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 23: 583 (1978).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    I. Sick, E. B. Hughes, T. W. Donnelly, Jr ., J. D. Walecka, and G. E. Walker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23: 1117 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    R. S. Hicks, private communication.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    H. Zarek, B. 0. Pich, T. E. Drake, D. J. Rowe, W. Bertozzi, C. Creswell, A. Hirsch, M. V. Hynes, S. Kowalski, B. Norum, F. N. Rad, C. P. Sargent, C. F. Williamson, and R. A. Lindgren, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38: 750 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    T. W. Donnelly, Jr., J. D. Walecka, G. E. Walker, and I. Sick, Phys. Letts. 32B: 545 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    R. A. Lindgren, C. W. Williamson, and S. Kowalski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40: 594 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    J. Lichtenstadt, J. Heisenberg, C. N. Papanicolas, C. P. Sargent, A. N. Courtemanche, and J. S. McCarthy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40: 1127 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    J. Lichtenstadt, J. Heisenberg, C. N. Papanicolas, J. S. McCarthy, and A. N. Courtemanche, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 24: 53 (1979).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    R. S. Henderson, B. M. Spicer, J. D. Svalbe, B. C. Officer, G. G. Shute, W. W. Devons, W. L. Friesel, W. P. Jones,A. C. Attard, to be published.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    G. S. Adams, A. D. Bacher, G. T. Emery, W. P. Jones, R. T. Kouzes, D. W. Miller, A. Picklesimer, and G. E. Walker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38: 1387 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    A. D. Bacher, G. T. Emery, W. P. Jones, D. W. Miller, G. Adams, F. Petrovich, and W. G. Love, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 23:945 (1978) and to be published.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    R. A. Lindgren, W. J. Gerace, A. D. Bacher, W. G. Love, and F. Petrovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42: 1524 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    S. Yen and T. E. Drake, private communication.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    S. Yen, T. E. Drake, and A. D. Bacher, private communication.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    H. A. Thiessen, private communication.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    C. Olmer, B. Zeidman, D. F. Geesaman, R. E. Segel, R. L. Boudrie, C. L. Morris, and H. A. Thiessen, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 24: 687 (1979).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    F. Petrovich, W. G. Love, R. A. Lindgren, W. J. Gerace,G. Walker, A. D. Bacher, E. Siciliano, H. A. Thiessen,B. Zeidman, D. Geesaman, and C. Olmer, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 24: 677 (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Petrovich
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations