Advertisement

Properties and Applications of Effective Interactions Derived from Free Nucleon-Nucleon Forces

  • W. G. Love

Abstract

Techniques are outlined for deriving effective internucleon interactions for nucleon-nucleus and nucleus-nucleus scattering at bombarding energies (Ep) between 10 and 200 MeV per nucleon. Below Ep=65 MeV, the effective interaction is based on G matrices constructed from realistic internucleon potentials. For Ep≳100 MeV a complex effective interaction is derived directly from the free nucleon-nucleon t-matrix. These interactions are applied to a variety of nucleon-nucleus scattering processes and charge exchange reactions which sample some of the most important characteristics of the interactions and illustrate the roles played by the central, spin-orbit and tensor parts of the force.

Keywords

Effective Interaction Transition Density Impulse Approximation Tensor Force Calculated Cross Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. M. Austin, in: “The Two-Body Force in Nuclei,” ed. S. M. Austin and G. M. Crawley, Plenum, New York (1972).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Atkinson, and V. A. Madsen, Phys. Rev. C1: 1377 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. G. Love and G. R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A159: 1 (1970).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Schaeffer, Nucl. Phys. A132: 186 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. V. Geramb and K. Amos, Nucl. Phys. A163: 337 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Petrovich, H. McManus, V. A. Madsen and J. Atkinson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22: 895 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. G. Love, Part. and Nuclei 3:318 (1972); Nucl. Phys. A312: 160 (1978).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. H. MacGregor, R. A. Arndt and R. M. Wright, Phys. Rev. 182: 1714 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. K. Kerman, H. McManus and R. M. Thaler, Ann. Phys. 8: 551 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. E. Brown,“Unified Theory of Nuclear Models and Forces,” John Wiley & Sons, New York (1967); B. L. Scott and S. A. Moszkowski, Ann. of Phys. 14: 107 (1961).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. P. Jeukenne, A. Lejeune and C. Mahaux, Phys. Rev. C16: 80 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. A. Brieva and J. R. Rook, Nucl. Phys. A297:206 (1978); F. A. Brieva, H. V. Geramb and J. R. Rook, to be published.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Bertsch, J. Borysowicz, H. McManus and W. G. Love, Nucl. Phys. A284: 399 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. R. Satchler and W. G. Love, Phys. Lett. 65B: 415 (1976).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Wong, J. D. Anderson, V. A. Madsen, F. A. Schmittroth and M. J. Stomp, Phys. Rev. C3: 1904 (1971).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. G. Love and L. J. Parish, Nucl. Phys. A157: 625 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. P. Elliot, A. D. Jackson, H. A. Mavromatis, E. A. Sanderson and B. Singh, Nucl. Phys. Al21: 241 (1968).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Schaeffer and J. Raynal, unpublished.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. G. Love, Phys. Lett 35B:371 (1971); Nucl. Phys. A192: 49 (1972).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. M. Moss, W. D. Cornelius and D. R. Brown, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41: 930 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. T. H. Van Oers and H. Haw, Phys. Lett. 45B: 227 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y. Eisen and B. Day, Phys. Lett 63B: 253 (1976).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    G. R. Satchler and W. G. Love, to be published.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    F. D. Becchetti and G. W. Greenlees, Phys. Rev. 182: 1190 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    F. Petrovich in: “Microscopic Optical Potentials,” vol. 89, Springer-Verlag, New York (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. E. Bainum, R. W. Finlay, J. Rapaport, J. D. Carlson and W. G. Love, Phys. Rev. C16: 1377 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alan Scott, M. Owais and W. G. Love, Nucl. Phys. A289: 123 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. Ring and J. Speth, Nucl. Phys. A235: 315 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. C. Halbert and G. R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A233: 265 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    W. G. Love, Phys. Rev. C15: 1261 (1977).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. D. Schery, D. A. Lind and Howard Weiman, Phys. Rev. C14: 1800 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    J. M. Moss, C. Brassard, R. Vyse and J. Gosset, Phys. Rev. C6:168 (1972); J. Gosset, B. Mayer and J. L. Escudie,Phys. Rev. C14: 878 (1976).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. D. Carlson, C. D. Zafiratos and D. A. Lind, Nucl. Phys. A249: 29 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    S. D. Schery, S. M. Austin, A. Galonsky, L. E. Young and U. E. P. Berg, Phys. Lett. 79B: 30 (1978).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    S. Cohen and D. Kurath, Nucl. Phys. 73: 11 (1965).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    B. D. Anderson, D. E. Bainum, A. Baldwin, C. C. Foster, C. D. Goodman, C. A. Goulding, M. B. Greenfield, J. N. Knudson, R. Madey, J. Rapaport and T. R. Whitten, IUCF Techn. and Scient. Report, p. 117 (1978) and private communication.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. H. Howell, F. S. Dietrich, D. W. Heikkinen and F. Petrovich, to be published.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    L. S. Rodberg and R. M. Thaler, “The Quantum Theory of Scattering,” Academic Press, New York (1967); M. L. Goldberger and K. M. Watson, “Collision Theory,” John Wiley & Sons, New York (1964).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    W. G. Love, Alan Scott, F. Todd Baker, W. P. Jones and J. D. Wiggins, Jr., Phys. Lett. 73B: 277 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    A. Picklesimer and G. Walker, Phys. Rev. C17: 237 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    P. Schwandt, A. Nadasen, P. P. Singh, M. D. Kaitchuck, W. W. Jacobs, J. Meek, A. D. Bacher and P. T. Debevec, IUCF Techn. and Scient. Report, p. 79 (1978).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    P. Schwandt, F. Petrovich, W. G. Love and A. Picklesimer, to be published.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Alan Scott, F. Todd Baker, W. G. Love, W. P. Jones and J. D. Wiggins, Jr., to be published.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    R. P. Liljestrand, G. S. Blanpied, W. R. Coker, C. Harvey, G. W. Hoffmann, L. Ray, C. Glashausser, G. S. Adams, T. S. Bauer, G. Igo, G. Pauletta, C. A. Whitten, Jr., M. A. Oothoudt, B. E. Wood and H. Mann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42: 363 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    J. R. Comfort, S. Austin, P. Debevec, G. Moake, R. Finlay and W. G. Love, IUCF Techn. and Scient. Report, p. 91 (1978); J. R. Comfort in: “Proc. International Symposium on Nuclear Direct Reaction Mechanisms,” Fukuoka, Japan, Oct. 25–28 (1978), to be published.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Proc. International Symposium on Nuclear Direct Reaction Mechanisms,“ Fukuoka, Japan, Oct. 25–28 (1978), to be published.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    N. Ensslin, W. Bertozzi, S. Kowalski, C. P. Sargent, W. Turchinetz, C. F. Williamson, S. P. Fivozinsky, J. W. Lightbody, Jr. and S. Penner, Phys. Rev. C9: 1705 (1974).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    S. M. Austin, private communication.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    A. D. Bacher, G. T. Emery, W. P. Jones, D. W. Miller, G. S. Adams, F. Petrovich and W. G. Love, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 23:945 (1978) and to be published.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    R. A. Lindgren, W. J. Gerace, A. D. Bacher, W. G. Love and F. Petrovich, to be published.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Alan Scott, F. Todd Baker, R. C. Styles, W. P. Jones and J. D. Wiggins, Jr., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 23:13 (1978) and private communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. G. Love
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations