Advertisement

Experimental Capabilities — Present and Future

  • C. D. Zafiratos

Abstract

The first purpose of this talk is to describe existing experimental capabilities for the study of (p,n) reactions at energies which are clearly in the direct-reaction regime. Due to the unification of (p,p), (p,n), (n,p) and (n,n) reactions under an isospin formalism some slight attention also will be given to (n,n) and (n,p) capabilities at appropriate energies.

Keywords

Flight Path Recoil Proton Polarize Intensity Conference Topic Large Volume Detector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. A. C. D. Lind, R. F. Bentley, J. Zafiratos, Nucl. Instr. Glasgow, F. O. Purser, Boyce, D. H. Epperson, D. Carlson, S. D. and Methods J. C. Clement, G. H. H. Hogue, E. G. Schery, and 130, 93 (1976).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. W. J. R. Mack, K. Stelzer, Bilpuch, H. W. Newson and C. R. Gould, Proc. of Neutron Cross Sections and Technology Conference, March, 1975, NBS 425 Vols. 142, edited by R. A. Schrack and C. D. Bowman.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. C. Davis, J. D. Anderson, E. K. Freytag, and D. R. Rawles, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Science 20, 213 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ranjan K. Bhomik, Robert R. Doering, Lawrence E. Young, Sam M. Austin, Aaron Galonsky, and Steve D. Schery, Nucl. Instr. and Methods 143, 63 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Charles D. Goodman, Charles C. Foster, Mark B. Greenfield, Charles,A. Goulding, David A. Lind, and Jacobo Rapaport, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Science 26, 2248 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. D. Schery, D. A. Lind, and H. H. Wieman, Phys. Rev. C 14, 1800 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Madey, B. D. Anderson, A. R. Baldwin, J. Knudson, J. W. Watson, T. Witten, and C. Foster, to be published in Nucl. Instr. and Methods.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. D. Carlson, R. W. Finlay, and D. E. Bainum, Nucl. Inst. and Methods 147, 353 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. D. Goodman, J. Rapaport, D. E. Bainum, and E. Bryant, Nucl. Instr. and Methods 151, 125 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. C. D. Goodman, J. Rapaport, D. E. Bainum, M. B. Greenfield, and C. A. Goulding, IEEE Trans. in Nucl. Sci. NS-25 (1978) 577.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    D. E. Bainum, R. W. Finlay, J. Rapaport, M. H. Hadizadeh, and J. D. Carlson, Nucl. Phys. A311, 492 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    H. H. Hogue, P. L. van Behren, D. H. Epperson, S. G. Glendenning, P. W. Lisowski, C. E. Nelson, H. W. Newson, F. 0. Purser, W. Tornow, C. R. Gould, and L. W. Seagondolor, Nuclear Science and Engineering 68, 38 (1978).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Sam Austin, private communication.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    A Proposal for a National Light Ion Accelerator Facility, Nuclear Physics Laboratory, University of Colorado, 1978 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    P. A. Smith, accepted for publication in Nucl. Instr. and Methods.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    C. D. Goodman, proceedings this conference.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    F. P. Brady, proceedings this conference and N.S.F. King, proceedings this conference.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    R. N. Finlay, proceedings this conference.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. D. Zafiratos
    • 1
  1. 1.Nuclear Physics LaboratoryUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations