Significance of Recent Hominoid Discoveries from the Siwalik Hills of India

  • S. R. K. Chopra
Part of the Advances in Primatology book series (AIPR)


In earlier communications (Chopra, 1974, 1976, 1978) I have given a brief historical review of paleoprimatological studies in India and the scientific issues that engaged earlier researchers. It is clear that past research was largely exploratory in nature, and only recently have careful followup studies both in the field and the laboratory been attempted with a view to identifying the. region’s potential. Of interest are studies on the paleoecology of the Siwalik* Formations, on stratigraphic ranges and faunal assemblages for reconstructing paleoenvironments on the basis of lithology and paleocommunity structures, and, finally, on human origins (Vasishat et al.,1978a,b; Gaur et al.,1978a,b). As an integral part of the theme of a new interpretation of human ancestry, it is relevant to note the new lower primate finds [tree shrews (Chopra et al.,1979; Chopra and Vasishat, 1979), adapids and lorisids (Chopra and Vasishat, 1980a,b)], which have provocative implications for the evolutionary diversification of primates on the Indian subcontinent. It would also be relevant to discuss Pleistocene correlations with climatic and human cultural levels in various parts of the subcontinent, to bring into sharper focus the possibility of the origin of the hominid family in India and the crucial need for new investigations and acquisition of future support for the extension of this work. However, as the title of this chapter suggests, it is intended here to discuss only the significance of new Miocene hominoids in the Siwalik Hills as providing new evidence for a reinterpretation of ape and human ancestry.


Indian Subcontinent Occlusal Surface Tree Shrew Mental Foramen Occlusal View 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brown, B., Gregory, W. K., and Hellman, M. 1924. On three incomplete anthropoid jaws from the Siwaliks, India. Am. Mus. Novit. 130: 1–9.Google Scholar
  2. Chopra, S. R. K. 1968e. The early man in Sivaliks, I. Akashvani, 33 (45): 5.Google Scholar
  3. Chopra, S. R. K., 1968b. The early man in Sivaliks, II. Akashvani, 33 (47): 9.Google Scholar
  4. Chopra, S. R. K. 1974. Palaeoprimatological studies in India with special reference to recent finds in the Sivaliks. Presidential Address, in: Proceedings of LXVIIh Session, Indian Science Congress, Part II, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  5. Chopra, S. R. K. 1976. Primatological studies in India, in: Anthropology in India ( H. K. Rakshit, ed.), pp. 124–143, Anthropological Survey of India, Calcutta.Google Scholar
  6. Chopra, S. R. K. 1978. New fossil evidence on the evolution of Hominoidea in the Sivaliks and its bearing on the problem of the evolution of early man in India. J. Hum. Evol. 7: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chopra, S. R. K., and Kaul, S. 1975. New fossil Dryopithecus material from the Nagri beds at Haritalyangar (H.P.), in: Contemporary Primatology ( S. Kondo, M. Kawai, and A. Ehara, eds.), pp. 2–11, Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  8. Chopra, S. R. K., and Kaul, S. 1979. A new species of Pliopithecus from the Indian Sivaliks. J. Hum. Evol. 8: 475–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chopra, S. R. K., and Vasishat, R. N. 1979. Sivalik fossil tree shrews from Haritalyangar, India. Nature (Lond.) 281: 214–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chopra, S. R. K., and Vasishat, R. N. 1980a. Premiere indication de la presence dans le Mio-Pliocene des Siwaliks de l’Inde d’un Primate adapide, Indoadapis shivaii, nov. gen., nov. sp. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris D 290: 511–513.Google Scholar
  11. Chopra, S. R. K., and Vasishat, R. N. 19806. A new Mio-Pliocene Indraloris (Primate) material with comments on the taxonomic status of Sivanasua (carnivore) from the Sivaliks of the Indian sub-continent, J. Hum. Evol. 9: 129–132.Google Scholar
  12. Chopra, S. R. K., Kaul, S., and Vasishat, R. N. 1979. Miocene tree shrews from the Indian Sivaliks. Nature (Lond.) 281: 213–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colbert, E. H. 1935. Siwalik mammals in the American Museum of Natural History. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. N.S. 26: 1–401.Google Scholar
  14. Conroy, G. C., and Pilbeam, D. R. 1973. Ramapithecus: A review of its hominid status, in: Paleoanthropology, Morphology and Paleoecology (R. H. Tuttle, ed.), pp. 59–86, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  15. Corruccini, R. S. 1975. Multivariate analysis of Gigantopithecus mandibles. Am. J. Phy. Anthropol. 42: 167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dutta, A. K., Basu, P. K., and Sastry, M. V. A. 1976. On the new finds of hominids and additional finds of pongids from the Siwaliks of Ramnagar area, Udampur District, J & K state. Ind. J. Earth Sci. 3 (2): 234–235.Google Scholar
  17. Ferembach, D., 1958. Les Limnopithèques du Kenya. Ann. Paleontol. 44: 149–249.Google Scholar
  18. Fleagle, J. G. 1975. A small gibbon-like hominoid from the Miocene of Uganda. Folia Primatol. 24: 1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frayer, D. W., 1973. Gigantopithecus and its relationship to Australopithecus. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 39: 413–426.Google Scholar
  20. Frisch, J. 1973. The hylobatid dentition. Gibbon and Siamang 2: 55–95.Google Scholar
  21. Gaur, R., Vasishat, R. N., and Chopra, S. R. K. 1978a. Upper Sivalik vertebrate communities of the Indian subcontinent. Recent Res. Geol. 5: 206–218.Google Scholar
  22. Gaur, R., Sablok, A. K., Chopra, S. R. K., and Suneja, I. J. 1978b. A palaeoenvironmental study of the Sivalik Formations in parts of Bilaspur District (Himachal Pradesh). Man and Environ. 2: 69–71.Google Scholar
  23. Greenfield, L. O. 1974. Taxonomic re-assessment of two Ramapithecus specimens. Folia Primatol. 22: 97–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gregory, W. K., and Hellman, M. 1926. The dentition of Dryopithecus and the origin of man. Anthropol. Pap. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 28: 1–123.Google Scholar
  25. Gregory, W. K., Hellman, M., and Lewis, G. E. 1938. Fossil anthropoids of the Yale-Cambridge India expedition of 1935. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 495: 1–27.Google Scholar
  26. Groves, C. P. 1970. Gigantopithecus and the mountain gorilla. Nature (Lond.) 226:973–974. Groves, C. P. 1972. Systematics and phylogeny of gibbons. Gibbon and Siamang 1: 1–89.Google Scholar
  27. Gupta, V. J. 1969. Fossil primates from the Lower Sivaliks of Kangra District, H.P. Research Bull. (N.S.) Panjab Univ. India 20: 577–578.Google Scholar
  28. Hill, W. C. O. 1972. Evolutionary Biology of the Primates, Academic, London, 233 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Hooijer, D. A. 1948. Prehistoric teeth of man and of the orang-utan from Central Sumatra, with notes on the fossil orang-Utan from Java and Southern China. Zool. Meded. Rijks Mus. Nat. Hist. 29: 175–301.Google Scholar
  30. Hooijer, D. A., and Colbert, E. H. 1951. A note on the Plio-Pleistocene boundary in the Siwalik-Series of India and Java. Am. J. Sci. 249: 533–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jolly, C. J. 1970. The seed-eaters: A new model of hominid differentiation based on baboon analogy. Man 5: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krynine, P. D. 1937. Petrography and genesis of the Siwalik series. Am. J. Sci. 34: 422–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leakey, L. S. B. 1970. “Newly” recognised mandible of Ramapithecus. Nature (Lond.) 225:199–200.Google Scholar
  34. Lewis, G. E. 1934. Preliminary notice of new man-like apes from India. Am. J. Sci. 27: 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis, G. E. 1937. Taxonomic syllabus of Siwalik fossil anthropoids. Am. J. Sci. 34: 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lydekker, R. 1879. Notices of Siwalik mammals. Rec. Geol. Surv. India 11: 64–85.Google Scholar
  37. Lydekker, R. 1884. Rodents, ruminants and synopsis of Mammalia. Mem. Geol. Sure. India (Pal-aeontol. Ind.) Ser. X 3: 105–134.Google Scholar
  38. Pandey, J., and Sastri, V. V. 1968. On a new species of Sivapithecus from the Siwalik rocks of India. J. Geol. Soc. India 9 (2): 206–211.Google Scholar
  39. Pilbeam, D. R. 1968. The earliest hominids. Nature (Lond.) 219: 1335–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pilbeam, D. R. 1969. Newly recognised mandible of Ramapithecus. Nature (Lond.) 222:1093–1094. Pilbeam, D. R. 1970. Gigantopithecus and the origins of the Hominidae. Nature (Lond.) 225: 516–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pilbeam, D. R. 1979. Recent finds and interpretations of Miocene hominoids. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 8: 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pilgrim, G. E. 1910. Notices of a new mammalian genera and species from the tertiaries of India. Rec. Geol. Surv. India 40: 63–71.Google Scholar
  43. Pilgrim, G. E. 1915. New Siwalik primates and their bearing on the question of the evolution of man and the Anthropoidea. Rec. Geol. Surv. India 45: 1–74.Google Scholar
  44. Pilgrim, G. E. 1927. A Sivapithecus palate and other primate fossils from India. Mem. Geol. Surv. India (Palaeontol. Ind.) 14: 1–26.Google Scholar
  45. Prasad, K. N., 1962. Fossil primates from the Siwalik beds near Haritalyangar, Himachal Pradesh, India. J. Geol. Soc. India 3: 86–96.Google Scholar
  46. Prasad, K. N. 1964. Upper Miocene anthropoids from the Siwalik beds of Haritalyangar, Himachal Pradesh, India. Palaeontology 7: 124–134.Google Scholar
  47. Prasad, K. N. 1968. The vertebrate fauna from the Siwalik beds of Haritalyangar, Himachal Pradesh, India. Palaeontol. Ind. 39: 1–55.Google Scholar
  48. Prasad, K. N. 1969a. Fossil anthropoids from the Siwalik system of India, in: Proceedings Second International Congress Primatology, Atlanta, GA. 1968, Vol. 2, pp. 131–134, Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  49. Prasad, K. N. 1969b. Critical observations on the fossil anthropoids from the Siwalik system of India. Folia Primatol. 10: 288–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prasad, K. N. 1971. Ecology of the fossil Hominoidea from the Siwaliks of India. Nature (Lond.) 232: 413–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prasad, K. N. 1978. Observations on the genus Ramapithecus, in Recent Advances in Primatology, Volume 3, Evolution ( D. J. Chivers and K. A. Joysey, eds.), pp. 495–497, Academic, New York.Google Scholar
  52. Remane, A. 1965. Die Geschichte der Menschenaffen, in: Menschliche Abstammungslehre ( G. Heberer, ed.), pp. 249–309, Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  53. Robinson, J. T., and Steudel, K. 1973. Multivariate discriminate analysis of dental data bearing on early hominid affinities. J. Hum. Evol. 2: 509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sahni, A., Kumar, V., and Srivastava, V. C. 1974. Dryopithecus (Subgenus: Sivapithecus) and associ- ated vertebrates from the Lower Siwaliks of Uttar Pradesh. Bull. Ind. Geol. Assoc. 7 (1): 54.Google Scholar
  55. Simons, E. L., and Chopra, S. R. K. 1969a. A preliminary announcement of a new Gigantopithecus species from India, in: Proceedings Second International Congress Primatology, Atlanta, GA. 1968, Vol. 2, pp. 135–142, Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  56. Simons, E. L., and Chopra, S. R. K. 1969b. Gigantopithecus (Pongidae, Hominoidea). A new species from North India. Postilla (Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist., Yale Univ.) 138: 1–18.Google Scholar
  57. Simons, E. L., and Ettel, P. C. 1970. Gigantopithecus. Sci. Am. 222(1):76–85.Google Scholar
  58. Simons, E. L., and Pilbeam, D. R. 1965. Preliminary revision of the Dryopithecinae (Pongidae, Anthropoidea). Folia Primatol. 3: 81–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tattersall, I. 1969a. Ecology of north Indian Ramapithecus. Nature (Lend.) 221: 451–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tattersall, I. 1969b. More on the ecology of Ramapithecus. Nature (Lond.) 224: 821–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tuttle, R. H. 1972. Functional and evolutionary biology of hylobatid hands and feet. Gibbon and Siamang 1: 136–206.Google Scholar
  62. Von Koenigswald, G. H. R. 1952. Gigantopithecus blacki von Koenigswald, a giant fossil hominoid from the Pleistocene of southern China. Anthropol. Pap. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 43(4):291–326.Google Scholar
  63. Von Koenigswald, G. H. R. 1968. The phylogenetical position of the Hylobatidae, in: Taxonomy and Phylogeny of the Old World Primates with Special Reference to the Origin of Man ( A. B. Chiarelli, ed.), pp. 271–276, Rosenberg and Sellier, Torino.Google Scholar
  64. Vasishat, R. N. 1979. Contributions to the Tertiary Mammals from Haritalyangar, Himachal Pradesh, India, and Their Evolutionary Significance in the Context of Palaeoprinuuological Studies, Ph.D. Dissertation, Panjab University, Chandigarh.Google Scholar
  65. Vasishat, R. N., Gaur, R., and Chopra, S. R. K. 1978a. Community structure of Middle Sivalik vertebrates from Haritalyangar (H.P.), India. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 23: 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vasishat, R. N., Gauer, R., and Chopra, S. R. K. 19786. Geology, fauna and palaeoenvironments of Lower Sivalik deposits around Ramnagar, India. Nature (Land.) 275: 736–737.Google Scholar
  67. Wadia, D. N., and Aiyengar, N. K. N. 1938. Fossil anthropoids from India: A list of the fossil material hitherto discovered from the Tertiary deposits of India. Rec. Geol. Surv. India 72: 467–494.Google Scholar
  68. Wolpoff, M. H. 1971. Interstitial wear. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 34: 205–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Woo, J. K. 1962. The mandibles and dentition of Gigantopithecus. Palaeontol. Sin. 11:1–94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. R. K. Chopra
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyPanjab UniversityChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations