Advertisement

Miocene Hominoid Postcranial Morphology

Monkey-like, Ape-like, Neither, or Both?
  • M. D. Rose
Part of the Advances in Primatology book series (AIPR)

Abstract

It is not the purpose of this chapter to provide definitive answers to any of the questions asked in its title, even though various aspects of these questions have formed a large part of the lively debate that has been conducted in recent years concerning Miocene hominoid postcrania. The material available for investigation has been increased significantly recently by new specimens from the early Miocene of East Africa [KNM-RU 2036C and KNM-RU 5872 specimens (Walker and Pickford, this volume, Chapter 12)], the later Miocene of Rudabánya, Hungary [Rud specimens (Morbeck, this volume, Chapter 14)], and the Potwar Plateau of Pakistan [most GSP specimens (Pilbeam et al., 1980)]. The main purpose of this chapter is to make some general comments on functional features of the morphology of some Miocene hominoid postcrania and on possible positional capabilities consistent with those features. Similarities to and differences from features of Miocene species evident in the postcrania of groups of living higher primates will be made purely in terms of function. Attention will be directed toward the larger bodied Miocene hominoids. Original specimens of all the East African and Asian material have been examined. The European material has been examined in cast form.

Keywords

Articular Surface Radial Head Stance Phase Subtalar Joint Talocrural Joint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, C. H., and Napier, J. R. 1952. The axis of rotation at the ankle joint.J. Anat. 86: 1–9.Google Scholar
  2. Conroy, G. C. 1976. Primate postcranial remains from the Oligocene of Egypt. Contrib. Primatol. 8: 1–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Corruccini, R. S., Ciochon, R. L., and McHenry, H. M. 1975. Osteometric shape relationships in the wrist joint of some anthropoids. Folia Primatol. 24: 250–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corruccini, R. S., Ciochon, R. L., and McHenry, H. M. 1976. The postcranium of Miocene hominoids: Were dryopithecines merely “dental apes”? Primates 17: 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grand, T. 1968a. Functional anatomy of the upper limb. Bibl. Primatol. 7: 104–125.Google Scholar
  6. Grand, T. 1968b. The functional anatomy of the lower limb of the howler monkey (Alouatta caraya). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 28: 163–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harrison, T. 1982. Small-Bodied Apes from the Miocene of East Africa, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
  8. Jenkins, F. A., Jr. 1973. The functional anatomy and evolution of the mammalian humero-ulnar articulation. Am. J. Anat. 137: 281–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jenkins, F. A., Jr. 1981. Wrist rotation in primates: A critical adaptation for brachiators. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 48: 429–451.Google Scholar
  10. Jenkins, F. A., Jr., and Fleagle, J. G. 1975. Knuckle walking and the functional anatomy of the wrist in living apes, in: Primate Functional Morphology and Evolution ( R. H. Tuttle, ed.), pp. 213–227, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  11. Jolly, C. J. 1967. The evolution of baboons, in: The Baboon in Medical Research (H. Vagtborg, ed.), Volume II, pp. 23–50, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  12. Le Gros Clark, W. E. 1959. The Antecedents of Man, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  13. Le Gros Clark, W. E., and Leakey, L. S. B. 1951. The Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa. Fossil Mammals of Africa (Br. Mus. Nat. Hist.) 1: 1–117.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, O.J. 1977. Joint remodelling and the evolution of the human hand./ Anat. 123: 157–201.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, O. J. 1980a. The joints of the evolving foot. Part I. The ankle joint. J. Anat. 130: 527–543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis, O. J. 1980b. The joints of the evolving foot. Part II. The intrinsic joints. J. Anat. 130: 833–857.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis, O. J. 1980c. The joints of the evolving foot. Part III. The fossil evidence. J. Anat. 131: 275–298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lisowski, F. P., Albrecht, G. H., and Oxnard, C. E. 1976. African fossil tali: Further multivariate morphometric studies. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 45: 5–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McHenry, H. M., and Corruccini, R. S. 1975. Distal humerus in hominoid evolution. Folia Primatol. 23: 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McHenry, H. M., and Corruccini, R. S. 1976. Affinities of Tertiary hominoid femora. Folia Primatol. 26: 139–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morbeck, M. E. 1975. Dryopithecus africanus forelimb. J. Hum. Evol. 4: 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morbeck, M. E. 1976. Problems in reconstruction of fossil anatomy and locomotor behaviour: The Dryopithecus elbow complex. J. Hum. Evol. 5: 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morbeck, M. E. 1977. The use of casts and other problems in reconstructing the Dryopithecus (Proconsul) africanus wrist complex. J. Hum. Evol. 6: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Napier, J. R. 1964. The evolution of bipedal walking in the hominids. Arch. Biol. (Liege) 75: 673–708.Google Scholar
  25. Napier, J. R., and Davis, P. R. 1959. The forelimb skeleton and associated remains of Proconsul africanus. Fossil Mammals of Africa (Br. Mus. Nat. Hist.) 16 :1–69.Google Scholar
  26. O’Connor, B. L. 1975. The functional morphology of the cercopithecoid wrist and inferior radioulnar joints, and their bearing on some problems in the evolution of the Hominoidea. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol. 43: 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Connor, B. L. 1976. Dryopithecus (Proconsul) africanus: Quadruped or non-quadruped? J. Hum. Evol. 5: 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Connor, B. L., and Rarey, K. E. 1979. Normal amplitudes of radioulnar pronation and supina-tion in several genera of anthropoid primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 51: 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pilbeam, D. R., Rose, M. D., Badgley, C., and Lipschutz, B. 1980. Miocene hominoids from Pakistan. Postilla (Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist., Yale Univ.) 181: 1–94.Google Scholar
  30. Preuschoft, H. 1973. Body posture and locomotion in some East African Miocene Dryopithecinae, in: Human Evolution (M. Day, ed.), pp. 13–46, Symposium of the Society for the Study of Human Biology, Volume 11, Barnes and Noble, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Robertson, M. 1979. Positional behavior in Dryopithecus (Proconsul) africanus. Paper presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
  32. Robertson, M. 1979. Positional behavior in Dryopithecus (Proconsul) africanus. Paper presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
  33. Schön, M. A., and Ziemer, L. K. 1973. Wrist mechanisms and locomotor behavior of Dryopithecus (Proconsul) africanus. Folia Primatol. 20: 1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Washburn, S. L. 1951. The analysis of primate evolution with particular reference to the origin of man. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 15: 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zapfe, H. 1960. Die primatenfunde aus der Miozänen spaltenfüllung von Neudorf an der March (Dévínsk5 Nova Ves), Tschechoslowakei. Schweiz. Palaeontol. Abh. 78 :1–293.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. D. Rose
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, New Jersey Medical SchoolUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations