Advertisement

Cladistic Classification as Applied to Vertebrates

  • Niels Bonde
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 14)

Abstract

It is the object of this paper to point out some consequences and problems arising from the use of cladistic classifications. However, we must initially clarify what is implied in the terms ‘phylogenetic systematics’ and ‘cladistics’. Phylogenetic systematics (exemplified by Hennig, 1966) encompasses the whole theory of classification in accordance with phylogeny (biological evolutionary history), while cladistics (which alludes to Rensch’s kladogenesis (1947, 1959) and to Huxley’s term clade (e.g. 1959) for a strictly monophyletic group) could perhaps with some advantage be restricted to the practical methodological approach, as developed by Hennig (e.g. 1966), Brundin (e.g. 1968), Nelson (e.g. 1971), Miles (1973), Patterson (1973) Rosen (1973), and others. Cladistics, however, has been used as a designation for the theory of phylogenetic systematics (e.g. by Mayr, 1974); although more often the word cladism has been so used (e.g. Mayr, 1969; Darlington, 1970; Nelson, 1971). Instead of having two more or less synonymous concepts it might be worthwhile restricting them to one as suggested above. The merit of this action is to recognize that workers other than the ones employing cladistic methods are con-vinced that they produce phylogenetic classifications (e.g. Simpson, 1959: 300). Thus phylogenetic systematics appears to be a goal that many post-Darwinian taxonomists have striven for (Nelson, 1971: 376; 1973: 372), while cladistics is a practical approach to that end. The practitioners of such an approach may well be termed cladists.

Keywords

Phylogenetic Relationship Monophyletic Group Cladistic Analysis Ancestral Species Speciation Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashlock, P.D., 1971, Monophyly and associated terms. Syst. Zool., 20: 63–69.Google Scholar
  2. Ayala, F. (ed.), 1976, Molecular evolution. (Sinauer) Mass. Beckner, M., 1959, The biological way of thought. Columbia University Press, New York. 200 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Bock, W.J., 1959, Preadaptation and multiple evolutionary pathways. Evolution, 13: 194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bock, W.J., 1969, Discussion. The concept of Homology. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 167: 71–73.Google Scholar
  5. Bock, W.J., 1973, Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary classification. Syst. Zool., 22: 375–392.Google Scholar
  6. Bock, W.J., 1977, Foundations and methods of evolutionary classification. NATOASI, ‘Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution’. (This vol.).Google Scholar
  7. Bonde, N., 1975, Origin of “higher groups”: viewpoints of phylogenetic systematics. C611. Int. C.N.R.S., no. 218: 293–324.Google Scholar
  8. Bonde, N., 1975a, Review of “Interrelationships of fishes” by Greenwood, P.H., et al., 1973. Syst. Zool., 23: 562–569.Google Scholar
  9. Bonde, N., 1976, Nyt om menneskets udviklingshistorie (News of Man’s evolutionary history). Geol. Soc., Denmark, Arsskr. f. 1975: 19–34.Google Scholar
  10. Brundin, L., 1966, Transantarctic relationships and their significance, as evidenced by chironomid midges. K. Svenska Vetensk. Akad. Handl. (4), 11: 1–472.Google Scholar
  11. Brundin, L., 1968, Application of phylogenetic principles in systematics and evolutionary theory. Pp. 473–495 in: Orvig, T. (ed. )Google Scholar
  12. Brundin, L., 1972, Evolution, causal biology, and classification. Zool. Scripta, 1: 107–120.Google Scholar
  13. Brundin, L., 1972a, Phylogenetics and biogeography. A reply to Darlington’s “practical criticism” of Hennig - Brundin. Syst. Zool., 21: 69–79.Google Scholar
  14. Buck, R.C. & Hull, D.L., 1966, The logical structure of the Linnean hierarchy. Syst. Zool., 15: 97–111.Google Scholar
  15. Bush, G.L., 1975, Modes of animal speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System., 6: 339–364.Google Scholar
  16. Camin, J.H. & Sokal, R.R., 1965, A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution, 19: 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper, G.A., 1970, Generic characters of brachiopods. Proc. N. Amer. Paleont. Conv., C: 194–263.Google Scholar
  18. Cracraft, J., 1972, The relationships of the higher taxa of birds:Google Scholar
  19. Problems in phylogenetic reasoning. The Condor, 74: 579–592. Cracraft, J., 1974, Phylogenetic models and classification. Syst. Zool., 23: 71–90.Google Scholar
  20. Croizat, L., Nelson, G. & Rosen, D.E., 1974, Centers of origin and related concepts. Syst. Zool., 23: 265–287.Google Scholar
  21. Crowson, R.A., 1970, Classification and biology, 350p. London.Google Scholar
  22. Darlington, P., 1970, A practical criticism of Hennig-Brundin “Phylogenetic Systematics” and Antarctic biogeography. Syst. Zoo., 19: 1–18.Google Scholar
  23. Darwin, C.R., 1872, The origin of species. 6th ed., 592 p. (1956, reprint, Oxford University Press ). London.Google Scholar
  24. Davis, S.N., Reitan, P.H. & Pestrong, R., 1976, Geology: Our physical environment. ( McGraw Hill) London, N.Y. 470 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Delson, E. & Andrews, P., 1975, Evolution and interrelationships of the catarrhine primates. Pp. 405–446 in: Luckett, W.P. & Szalay, F.S. (eds.), Phylogeny of the Primates. Plenum, N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dendy, A., 1923 (1924), Outlines of evolutionary biology ( 3rd ed. ). Constable & Co. London. 481 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Ehrlich, P.R. & Raven, P.H., 1963, Differentiation of populations. Science, 165: 1228–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eldredge, N. & Gould, S.J., 1972, Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism, 82–115. In Schopf, T.J.M. (ed): Models in paleontology, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  29. Eldredge, N. & Tattersal, I., 1975, Evolutionary models, phylogen-etic reconstruction, and another look at hominid phylogeny. Contrib. Primatol., 5: 218–242.Google Scholar
  30. Endler, J.A., 1973, Gene flow and population differentiation. Science, 179: 243–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Farris, J.S., 1969, A successive approximation to character weighting. Syst. Zool., 18: 374–385.Google Scholar
  32. Farris, J.S., 1973, A probablistic model for infering evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool., 22: 250–256.Google Scholar
  33. Farris, J.S., 1976, Phylogenetic classification of fossils with Recent species. Syst. Zool., 25: 271–282.Google Scholar
  34. Farris, J.S., 1977, On the phenetic approach to vertebrate. classification. NATO-ASI, Major patterns in vertebrate evolution, (this vol.).Google Scholar
  35. Farris, J.S., Kluge, A.G. & Eckardt, M.N., 1970, A numerical ap-proach to phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 19: 172–189. Farris, J.S., Kluge, A.G. & Eckardt, M.N., 1970a, On predictivityGoogle Scholar
  36. and eficiency. Syst. Zool., 19: 363–372.Google Scholar
  37. Fitch, W., 1976, Molecular evolutionary clocks. Pp. 160–178 in Ayala, F. (ed.).Google Scholar
  38. Fitch, W., 1977, The phyletic interpretation of macromolecular sequence interpretation. NATO-ASI. 1976, ‘Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution’, (this vol.).Google Scholar
  39. Fitch, W.M. & Margoliash, E., 1967, Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science, 155: 276–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Forey, P.L., 1973, Relationships of elopomorphs, Pp. 351–368 in Greenwood, P.H., et al., (eds.).Google Scholar
  41. Frost, W.E., 1965, Breeding habits of Windermere charr, Salvelinus willughbii (Gunther), and their bearing on speciation of these fish. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B. Biol. Sci., 163: 232–284.Google Scholar
  42. Fryer, G. & Iles, T.D., 1972, The Cichlid Fishes of the Great Lakes of Africa. Their Biology and Evolution. TFH, Hong Kong. 641 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Gaffney, E.S., 1976, Phylogeny and classification of the higher categories of turtles. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 155 (5): 387–436.Google Scholar
  44. George, T.N., 1971, Systematics in palaeontology. J. Geol. Soc., Lond., 127 (3): 198–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ghiselin, N.T., 1966, An application of the theory of definitionsGoogle Scholar
  46. to systematic principles. Syst. Zool., 15: 127–130. Ghiselin, M.T., 1966a, On psychologism in the logic of taxanomic controversies. Syst. Zool., 15: 206–215.Google Scholar
  47. Ghiselin, M.T., 1974, A radical solution to the species problem. Syst. Zool., 23: 536–544.Google Scholar
  48. Gilmour, J.S.L., 1940, Taxonomy and philosophy. Pp. 461–475 in Huxley, J. (ed.).Google Scholar
  49. Gingerich. P.D., 1976, Paleontology and phylogeny: Patterns of evolution at the species level in Early Tertiary mammals. Amer. J. Sci., 276: 1–28.Google Scholar
  50. Goodman, M. & Moore, G.W., 1974, Phylogeny of hemoglobin. Syst. Zool., 22 (4): 508–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Goodrich, E.S., 1909, Vertebrata Craniata, first fasc., Cyclostomes and Fishes. In Lankaster, R. (ed.).Google Scholar
  52. Gottlieb, L.B., 1976, Biochemical consequences of speciation in plants. Pp. 123–140 in Ayala, F. (ed.).Google Scholar
  53. Grant, V. 1971, Plant speciation, 435 pp. ( Columbia University Press ), New York.Google Scholar
  54. Greenwood, P.H., 1970, On the genus Lycoptera and its relationships with the family Hiodontidae (Pisces, Osteoglossomorpha). Brit.Google Scholar
  55. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.), 19: 257–285. Greenwood, P.H., 1973, Interrelationships of osteoglossomorpha.Google Scholar
  56. Pp. 307–331 in Greenwood, P.H. et al., (eds.).Google Scholar
  57. Greenwood, P.H., Miles, R.S. & Patterson, C. (eds.), 1973, Inter-relationships of fishes. 536 pp. ( Academic Press ), London.Google Scholar
  58. Gregg, J.R., 1954, The language of taxonomy. An application of symbolic logic to the study of classificatory systems. 70 pp.(Columbia University Press), New York.Google Scholar
  59. Griffiths, G.C.D., 1972, The phylogenetic classification of Diptera, Cyclorrhapha, with special reference to the male postabdomen. Ser. Entomol., 8. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  60. Griffiths, G.C.D., 1974, On the foundations of biological systematics. Acta Biotheoretica, 23: 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gödel, K., 1931, Ueber formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monotshft. Math. Phys., 38: 173–198.Google Scholar
  62. Gutman, W.F., (this volume), Phylogenetic reconstruction - theory, methodology, and application to chordak evolution. NATO-ASI, 1976, ‘Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution’. (This vol.).Google Scholar
  63. Habermas, J., 1968, Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”. Suhrkamp Frankfurt a.M. (Norwegian ed., 1969: Vitenskap som ideologi. Gyldendal Oslo. 109 pp.).Google Scholar
  64. Haeckel, E., 1866, Generelle Morphologi der Organismen, II. Berlin. 462 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Harper, C.W., 1976, Phylogenetic inference in Paleontology. J. Paleont., 50: 180–193.Google Scholar
  66. Hecht, M.K., 1976, Phylogenetic inference and methodology as applied to the vertebrate record. Evolutionary Biol., 9: 335–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hecht, M.K. & Edwards, J.L., 1977, The methodology of phylogenetic inference above the species level. NATO-ASI. 1976. ‘Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution’. (This vol.).Google Scholar
  68. Hecht, M.K. & Edwards, J.L., 1976, The ‘determination of parallel or monophyletic relationships, the proteid salamanders: A test case. Amer. Nat., 110: 653–677.Google Scholar
  69. Hennig, W., 1950, Grundsüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin. 370 pp.Google Scholar
  70. Hennig, W., 1957, Systematik und Phylogenese. Ber. Hundertj. deutsche entomol. Ges. (1956), 50–71.Google Scholar
  71. Hennig, W., 1965, Phylogenetic systematics. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 10: 97–116.Google Scholar
  72. Hennig, W., 1966, Phylogenetic systematics, 263 p. Urbana, Ill. Hennig, W., 1969, Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Senckenberg Naturf. Ges. Frankfurt a.M. 436 pp.Google Scholar
  73. Hennig, W., 1971, Zur Situation der biologischen Systematik, 7–15.Google Scholar
  74. In Siewing, R. (ed.): Methoden der Phylogenetik, Erlanger Forschungen B, Naturwiss., 4, 88 p.Google Scholar
  75. Hennig, W., 1975, “Cladistic Analysis or Cladistic Classification?Google Scholar
  76. Hull, D.L., 1970, Syst Contemporary systematic philosophies. Ann. Rev. 1: 19–54.Google Scholar
  77. Huxley, J.S. (ed.), 1940, The new systematics. Oxford University Press, 583 pp.Google Scholar
  78. Huxley, J.S., 1957, The three types of evolutionary process. Nature, 180: 454–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Huxley, J.S., 1958, Evolutionary processes and taxonomy with special reference to grades. Pp. 21–39 in Hedberg, O. ( ed. ): Syste-matics of todya. Uppsala. Univ. Arsskr., 1958, 6.Google Scholar
  80. Huxley, J.S., 1959, Clades and grades. Publ. Syst. Assoc., 3: 21–22.Google Scholar
  81. Jardine, N., 1969, The observational and theoretical components of homology: a study based on the morphylogy of the dermal skull-roofs of rhipidistian fishes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 1: 327–361.Google Scholar
  82. Jardine, N. & Sibson, R., 1971, Methematical taxonomy. London. Jarvik, E., 1968, Aspects of vertebrate phylogeny. Pp. 498–527. In Orvig, T. (ed.).Google Scholar
  83. Kermack, K.A. & Kielan-Jaworowska, Z., 1971, Therian and non-ther-ian mammals. Pp. 103–115 in Kermack, D.M. & Kermack, K.A. (eds.): Early Mammals. Suppl. No. 1, Zool. J. Linn. Soc.Google Scholar
  84. Key, K.H.L., 1968, The concept of stasipatric speciation. Syst. Zool., 17: 14–22.Google Scholar
  85. Key, K.H.L., 1974, Speciation in the Australian moraline grasshoppers - taxonomy and ecology. Pp. 43–56 in White, M.J.0.). (ed.).Google Scholar
  86. Kiriakoff, S.G., 1959, Phylogenetic systematics versus typology. Syst. Zool., 8: 117–118.Google Scholar
  87. Kuhn, T.S., 1970, The structure of scientific revolutions ( 2nd ed., University Chicato Press ), Chicago. 210 pp.Google Scholar
  88. Lankester, E.R. (ed.), 1909, A treatise on Zoology. Adam & Black, London.Google Scholar
  89. Lehmann, J.P., 1975, Quelques réflexions sur la phylogenie des vertébrés inférieurs. Coll. Int. C.N.R.S., no. 218: 257–264.Google Scholar
  90. Löther, R., 1972 (1974), Die Beherrschung der Mannigfaltigkeit. Fischer Verlag Jena. 285 pp. Summary transi. 1974, Syst. Zool., 23: 291–296.Google Scholar
  91. LOvtrup, S., 1973, Classification, convention and logic. Zool. Scripta, 2: 49–61.Google Scholar
  92. L$vtrup, S., 1975, On phylogenetic classification. Acta Zool. Cracov. 20: 499–523.Google Scholar
  93. Luckett, W.P. & Szalay, F.S. (eds.), 1975, Phylogeny of the primates. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  94. MacFadden, B.J., 1976, Cladistic analysis of primitive equids withGoogle Scholar
  95. notes on other perissodactyls. Syst. Zool., 25: 1–14. Maslin, T.P., 1968, Taxonomic problems in parthenogenetic verte-brates. Syst. Zool., 17: 219–231.Google Scholar
  96. Mayr, E., 1942, Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University press, New York. 334 PP-Google Scholar
  97. Mayr, E. 1963, Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press. Cambridge. 797 pp.Google Scholar
  98. Mayr, E., 1965, Classification and phylogeny. Amer. Zool., 5: 165–174.Google Scholar
  99. Mayr, E., 1968, Theory of biological classification. Nature, 220: 545–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Mayr, E., 1969, Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York. 428 p.Google Scholar
  101. Mayr, E., 1974, Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification? Z. f. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsf. 12: 94–128.Google Scholar
  102. McKenna, M.C., 1975, Toward a phylogenetic classification of theGoogle Scholar
  103. Mammalia. Pp. 21–46, in Luckett, W.P. & Szalay, F.S. (eds.). Miles, R.S., 1973, Relationships of acanthodians, 63–103 in Green-Google Scholar
  104. wood, P.H. et al., (ed.).Google Scholar
  105. Miles, R.S., 1975, The relationships of the Dipnoi. Coll. Int. C.N.R.S., no. 218: 133–148, Paris.Google Scholar
  106. Nagel, E. & Newman, J.R., 1959 (1964), Gödel’s Proof. Routledge & Kegan, Paul. London. 118 pp.Google Scholar
  107. Nelson, G.J., 1969, Gill arches and the phylogeny of fishes, with notes on the classification of vertebrates. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 141: 475–552.Google Scholar
  108. Nelson, G.J., 1969a, The problem of historical biogeography. Syst. Zool., 18: 243–246.Google Scholar
  109. Nelson, G.J., 1970, Outline of a theory of comparative biology. Syst. Zool. 19: 373–384.Google Scholar
  110. Nelson, G.J., 1971a, ‘Cladism’ as a philosophy of classification. Syst. Zool., 20: 373–376.Google Scholar
  111. Nelson, G.J., 1971b, Paraphyly and polyphyly: Redefinitions. Syst. Zool., 20: 471–472.Google Scholar
  112. Nelson, G.J., 1972, Phylogenetic relationship and classification Syst. Zool., 21: 227–231.Google Scholar
  113. Nelson, G.J., 1972a, Cephalic sensory canals, pitlines, and the classification of esocoid fishes, with notes on galaxiids and other teleosts. Amer. Mus. Novitates, 2492: 1–49.Google Scholar
  114. Nelson, G.J., 1973 Comments on Hennig’s ‘Phylogenetic systematics’Google Scholar
  115. and its influence on ichthyology. Syst. Zool., 21: 364–374. Nelson, G.J., 1973a, The higher-level phylogeny of vertebrates.Google Scholar
  116. Syst. Zool., 22 (1): 87–91. Nelson, G.J., 1973b, ‘Monophyly again?’ - A reply to P.D. Ashlock. Syst. Zool., 22: 310–312.Google Scholar
  117. Nelson, G.J., 1973c, Comments on Leon Croizat’s biogeography. Syst. Zool., 22: 312–320.Google Scholar
  118. Nelson, G.J., 1974a, Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationships. Syst. Zool., 22: 344–359.Google Scholar
  119. Nelson, G.J., 1974b, Darwin-Hennig classification: A reply to Ernst Mayr. Syst. Zool., 23: 452–458.Google Scholar
  120. Nelson, G.J., 1975, Historical biogeography: An alternative formalization. Syst. Zool., 23: 555–558.Google Scholar
  121. Nelson, G.J., 1976, Reviews: Biogeography, the vicariance paradigm, and continental drift. Syst. Zool., 24: 490–504.Google Scholar
  122. Nevo, E., Kim, Y.J., Shaw, C.R. & Thaeler, C.S., Jr., 1974, Genetic variation, selection and speciation in Thomomys talpoides pocket gophers. Evolution, 28: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Orvig, T., (ed.), 1969, Current problems of lower vertebrate phylogeny. Nobel Symposium 4, 539 pp., Stockholm.Google Scholar
  124. Patterson, C., 1968, The caudal skeleton in Mesozoic acanthoptery-gian fishes. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Geol.), 17: 47–102. Patterson, C., 1973, Interrelationships of holosteans. Pp. 233–305 in Greenwood, P.H., et al., (ed.).Google Scholar
  125. Patterson, C., 1977, The contribution of paleontology to teleostean phylogeny. NATO-ASI, ‘Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution’, (this vol.).Google Scholar
  126. Patterson, C. & Rosen, D.E., 1977, Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. (In press).Google Scholar
  127. Popper, K.R., 1973 (1974), Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach ( 2nd ed. ). ( Clarendon Press, Oxford ). 380 pp.Google Scholar
  128. Popper, K., 1976, Unended quest. An intellectual autobiography. Fontana Collins Glasgow. 255 pp. Rev. ed. of. Rev. ed. of ‘Autobiography of Karl Popper’, 1974.Google Scholar
  129. Radnitsky, G., 1968 (1973), Contemporary schools of metascience. Göteborg, New York. 2 vols. (3rd ed., 1973, 446 pp., Chicago).Google Scholar
  130. Radnitsky, G., 1969, Ways of looking at science: on a synoptic study of contemporary schools of ‘metascience’. Scientia, 104: 49–57.Google Scholar
  131. Reed, C.A., 1960, Polyphyletic or monophyletic ancestry of mam- mals, or: What is a class? Evolution, 14: 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Remane, A., 1952, Die Grundlagen des natürlischen Systems der vergleichende Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Geest & Portig Leipzig.Google Scholar
  133. Remane, A., (1956, 1971 Die Grundlagen des natürlischen Systems, der vergleichende Anatomie und der Phylogenetil. (2. Aufl.) Verl. 0. Koeltz Taunus. 364 pp. (Reprint of 2nd ed. 1956, Geest & Portig Leipzig).Google Scholar
  134. Rensch, B., 1947, Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre F. Enke Stuttgart, 407 pp. (1973, 3rd ed., 468 pp).Google Scholar
  135. Rensch, R., 1959, Evolution above the species level. Columbia University Press, New York. 419 pp. (Transl. of ‘Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre’. 2nd ed., 1954).Google Scholar
  136. Romer, A.S., 1949, Time series and trends in animal evolution, 103–120. In Jepsen, G.L. et al., (eds.): Genetics, paleontology and evolution. Princeton.Google Scholar
  137. Romer, A.S., 1962, The vertebrate body. ( 3rd ed. ). Saunders, London.Google Scholar
  138. Romer, A.S., 1966, Vertebrate paleontology. 3rd ed., 468 p., Chicago.Google Scholar
  139. Rosen, D.E., 1973, Interrelationships of higher euteleostan fishes. Pp. 397–513 in Greenwood, P.H. et al., (ed.).Google Scholar
  140. Rosen, D.E., 1976, A vicariance model of Caribbean biogeography. Syst. Zool., 24: 431–464.Google Scholar
  141. Ruse, M., 1973, The philosophy of biology. ( Hutchinson University Library, London ). 231 pp.Google Scholar
  142. Schaeffer, B., Hecht, M.K. & Eldredge, N., 1972, Phylogeny and paleontology. Evol. Biol., 6: 31–46.Google Scholar
  143. Schaeffer, B. & Rosen, D., 1961, Major adaptive levels in the evolution of actinopterygian feeding mechanisms. Amer. Zoologist, 1: 187–204.Google Scholar
  144. Schlee, D., 1971, Die Rekonstruktion der Phylogenese mit Hennig’s Prinzip. Aufsätze Reden Senckenberg. Naturf. Ges., 20, 62 p. Schopf, T.J.M. (ed.), 1972, Models in paleontology, Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  145. Scott, G.H., 1976, Foraminiferal biostratigraphy and evolutionary models. Syst. Zool., 25 (1): 78–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Simpson, G.G., 1943, Criteria for genera, species and subspecies in zoology and paleozoology. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sco., 44 (2): 145–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Simpson, G.G., 1945, The principles of classification and a classi- fication of mammals Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 85: 1–350. Simpson, G.G., 1951, The species concept. Evolution, 5: 285–298.Google Scholar
  148. Simpson, G.G., 1951a, Horses. Oxford University Press, N.Y., 247 p. Simpson, G.G., 1959, Anatomy and morphology: Classification andGoogle Scholar
  149. evolution: 1859 and 1959. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 103 (2): 286–306.Google Scholar
  150. Simpson, G.G., 1959a, Mesozoic mammals and the polyphyletic origin of mammals. Evolution, 13: 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Simpson, G.G., 1959b, The nature and origin of supraspecific taxa.Google Scholar
  152. Cold Spring Harbour Symp. Quant. Biol., 24: 255–271.Google Scholar
  153. Simpson, G.G., 1960, Diagnosis of the classes Reptilia and Mammalia.Google Scholar
  154. Evolution, 14: 388–392.Google Scholar
  155. Simpson, G.G., 1961, Principles of animal taxonomy. 245 p., New York & London.Google Scholar
  156. Simpson, G.G., 1964, The meaning of a taxonomic statement, 1–31. In Washburn S.L. (ed.): Classification and human evolution. N.Y. Wenner-Gren Found. Viking Fund Publ. Anthropol., 37 (1963).Google Scholar
  157. Simpson, G.G., 1971, Status and problems of vertebrate phylogeny. (In Alvaredo, R., Gadea, E. & de Haro, A. (eds.): Simposio Internacional de Zoofilogenia ). Acta Salmantic., Cienc., 36: 353–368.Google Scholar
  158. Simpson, G.G., 1975, Recent advances in methods of phylogenetic inference. PP. 3–19 in Luckett, W.P. & Szalay, F.S. (eds.). Simpson, G.G., 1976, The compleat paleontologist? Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 1976: 1–13Google Scholar
  159. Sneath, P.H.A., 1975, Cladistic representation of reticulate evolution. Syst. Zool., 24: 360–368.Google Scholar
  160. Sokal, R.R., 1974, The species problem reconsidered. Syst. Zool., 22: 360–374.Google Scholar
  161. Sokal, R.R. & Crovello, T.J., 1970, The biological species concept: A critical evaluation. Amer. Naturalist, 104: 127–153. Sokal, R.R. & Sneath, P.H.A., 1963, Principles of numerical taxon-omy. 359 p. Freeman, San. Francisco.Google Scholar
  162. Sondaar, P.Y., 1968, The osteology of the manus of fossil and recent Equidae with special reference to phylogeny and function.Google Scholar
  163. Verh. Konik. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Natuurk., I, 25, No. 1: 76 pp (p pls, 25 figs.).Google Scholar
  164. Strickberger, M.W., 1968, Genetics. 868 p., New York. Sylvester-Bradley, P.C. (ed.), 1956, The species concept in palaeontology. Syst. Assoc. Publ. 2.Google Scholar
  165. Szarski, H., 1977, Sarcopterygii and the origin of tetrapods.Google Scholar
  166. NATO-ASI, ‘Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution’, (this vol.). Thenius, E., 1969, Stammesgeschichte der Säugetiere (einschliesslich der Hominiden). Handbuch der Zoologie, Band 8, Lief. 47 /48, 722 pp.Google Scholar
  167. Throckmorton, L.H., 1965, Similarity versus relationship in Drosophila. Syst. Zool., 14: 221–236.Google Scholar
  168. Tuomikoski, R., 1967, Notes on some principles of phylogenetic systematics. Ann. Ent. Fenn., 33(3): 137–147.Google Scholar
  169. Valen, L.V., 1960, Therapsids as mammals. Evolution, 14: 304–313. Wahlert, G.v., 1968, Latimeria und die Geschichte der Wirbeltiere. 125 p. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  170. Wahlert, G.V., 1972, The definite approach: Phylogeny an ecological process, 20 p. (preprint). XVII. Congr. Int. Zool., Theme 2. (M.S.).Google Scholar
  171. Westoll, T.S., 1956, The nature of fossil species, p. 53–62. I Sylvester-Bradley, P.C. (ed.).Google Scholar
  172. White, M.J.D., 1968, Models of speciation. Science, 159: 10651070.Google Scholar
  173. White, M.J.D., 1973, Animal Cytology and Evolution. ( 3rd ed. ), Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  174. White, M.J.D., 1973a, Chromosonal rearrangements in mammalian population polymorphism and speciation. Pp. 95–128 in Chiarelli, A.B. & Capanna, E. (eds.): Cytotaxonomy and vertebrate evolution. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  175. White, N.J.D., (ed.), 1974, Genetic mechanisms of speciation in Insects. Australia & N. Zealand Book Co. Sydney. 170 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Wiley, E.O., 1975, Karl R. Popper, systematics, and classification: A reply to Walter Bock and other evolutionary taxonomists. Syst. Zool., 24: 233–243.Google Scholar
  177. Wilson, E.O., 1965, A consistency test of phylogenies based on contemporaneous species. Syst. Zool., 14: 214–220.Google Scholar
  178. Winterbotton, R., 1974, The familial phylogeny of the Tetraodontiformes (Acanthopterygii: Pisces) as evidenced by their comparative myology. Smithsonian Contr. Zool., 155: 1–201, 185 figs.Google Scholar
  179. Woodger, J.H., 1952, From biology to mathematics. Brit. J. Phil. Sic., 3: 1–21.Google Scholar
  180. Zangerl, R., 1948, The methods of comparative anatomy and its contribution to the study of evolution. Evolution, 2: 351–374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niels Bonde
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut f. Historisk Geologi & PalaeontologiUniversity of CopenhagenKøbenhaven KDenmark

Personalised recommendations