Charm Production from 400 and 800 GeV/c Proton-Proton Collisions

  • A. T. Goshaw
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 197)


This is a report on charm particle production from pp interactions at 400 and 800 GeV/c as measured in experiments NA27 (CERN) and E743 (Fermilab). The 400 GeV/c data is final. It provides the most accurate charm production cross section measurement to date. The 800 GeV/c data is preliminary. The combined data provide a measurement, with small systematic error, of the energy dependence of charm hadroproduction from 27 to 39 GeV. These data are compared to the predictions of charm particle production via the QCD fusion model with various charm quark fragmentation schemes.


Production Cross Section Charm Quark Inclusive Cross Section Fusion Model Charm Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1).
    M. Aguilar-Benitez et. al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A258 (1987) 26.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2).
    G. Canough, Ph.D. dissertation, Notre Dame University (1987), unpublished.Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    M. Aguilar-Benitez et. al., Phys. Lett. B135 (1984) 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4).
    M. Aguilar-Benitez et al., Phys. Lett. B189 (1987) 476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5).
    M. Aguilar-Benitez et al., Charm Hadron Properties in 400 GeV/c pp Interactions, to be submitted to Z. Phys. C.Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    H.U. Bengtsson, CHARIS - The Lund Monte Carlo for charm production (private communication).Google Scholar
  7. H.U. Bengtsson and G. Ingelman, Comput. Phys. Commun. 34 (1985) 231.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7).
    E.J. Siskind et al., Phys. Rev. D., 21 (1980) 628.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8).
    These branching ratios were extracted from SPEAR results. SeeM. Aguilar-Benitez et al., Phys. Lett. B135 (1984) 237 for this analysis.Google Scholar
  10. 9).
    R. Ammar et. al., Phys. Lett. B183 (1987) 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10).
    M. Aguilar-Benitez et al., Phys. Lett. B201 (1988) 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11).
    D.W. Duke and J.F. Owens, Phys. Rev.D, 30 (1984) 49.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 12).
    E. Eichten et. al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 56 (1984) 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 13).
    B. Cox and P.K. Malhotra, Phys. Rev. D, 29 (1984) 63.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 14).
    B.L. Combridge, Nucl. Phys. B. 151 (1979) 429.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 15).
    C. Peterson et. al., Phys. Rev. D., 27 (1983) 105.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 16).
    J.F. Cudell, F. Halzen and K. Hikasa, Phys. Lett. BGoogle Scholar
  18. 17).
    K.R. Ellis et al., Proceedings of the Advanced Research Workshop on QCD Hard Hadronic Processes, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, October 8–13, 1987 (to be published).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. T. Goshaw
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations