Abstract
The satellites of Jupiter are hardly to the forefront of the typical astronomer’s consciousness, despite the remarkable findings of the Voyager mission. Even historians of astronomy tend to pass over the satellites in silence, perhaps thinking of them as nothing more than a trivial extension of the solar system—and paralleled by roughly comparable systems of moons around Mars, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. In the seventeenth century, however, they carried a cosmological message of great importance, for they were first seen at a time when the old and the new world systems were contending for the favor, not merely of astronomers, but of a significant fraction of the educated world. They were seen by Galileo in 1610. In 1676 Ole Rømer made use of them to show that light takes time to travel. My account runs for roughly half a century beyond this date, stopping at Bradley because, as I hope to explain, he marks the end of the first, largely empirical, phase of investigation of the satellites. I do not mean by this that no further empirical work was done—on the contrary, the most dedicated work of this sort was still in the future. Bradley’s proof of the aberration of light nevertheless clinched the argument for the finite velocity of light, at least in the eyes of reasonable men. He was one of the first to allow for the velocity of light in tables of the four satellites then recognized, and he it was who first saw that the inequalities in their motions are interconnected—and thus possibly a consequence of gravitational interactions. In a sense, therefore, he opened the way to the theoretical studies of this problem by Euler, Bailly, Lagrange, Laplace, and others.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Notes
Galileo Galilei, Le opere ,Antonio Favaro, editor, 20 Vols., (Barbera, Florence, 1890–1909; repr. with additions, Barbera, Florence, 1929–1939 and 1965).
S. Drake, Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo (Doubleday, New York, 1957).
J. Kepler, Dioptrice (Augustae Vindelicorum, 1611).
P. Humberd, “Le baptême des satellites de Jupiter,” Rev. Questions Sci. 117, 171, 175 (1940).
J. Kepler, Astionomi opera omnia ,Christian Frisch, editor, 8 Vols. (Frankfurt-Erlangen, 1858–1871; repr., Olms, Hildesheim, 1971).
J. Kepler, Conversation with Galileo’s Sidereal Messenger, Edward Rosen, editor (Johnson Reprint, New York & London, 1965).
A. M. Schyrlaeus de Rheita, Oculus Enoch et Eliae (Antwerp, 1645).
C. Huygens, Cosmotheoros (The Hague, 1698).
J. Kepler, Narratio de ohservationihus . . . (Frankfurt, 1611).
Galileo Galilei, Istoria e dimonstrazioni intorno alle macchie solari e loro accidenti . . . (Rome, 1613).
Stillman Drake, “Galileo and Satellite Predictions,” J. Hist. Astron. 10, 75–95 (1979).
J. W. Shirley, editor, Thomas Harriot, Renaissance Scientist (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1974).
R. M. McKeon, “Les débuts de l’astronomie de precision,” Physis 13, 225–230 (1971).
A Borelli, Theorica Mediceorum planetarum (Florence, 1666), pp. 142–144.
M. L. Righini Bonelli, “Galileo, l’orologio, il giovilabio,” Physis 13, 412–420 (1971).
P. E. Ariotti, “Aspects of the Conception and Development of the Pendulum in the 17th Century,” Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 8, 329–410 (1972).
R. T. Gould, The Marine Chronometer, its History and Development (J. D. Potter, London, 1923), pp. 11–17.
E. Halley, in Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 18 (214), 237–256 (1694).
R. Grant, History of Physical Astronomy(Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, London, 1852).
S. Mayr, Mundus Jovialis (Nuremberg, 1614). An English translation by A. O. Prickard is in Observatory 39, 367–381, 403–412, 443–452, 498–503 (1916).
J. Klug, “Simon Marius aus Gunzenhausen und Galileo Galilei...,” Ahhandl. math.-phys. Kl. Königlich Bayerischen Akad. Wiss. 22, 385–526 (1906).
J. A. C. Oudemans and J. Bosscha, “Galilee et Marius,” Arch. Néerl. Sci. Exactes Nat. ,2nd Ser., 8, 115–189 (1903).
J. Bosscha, “Réhabilitation d’un astronome calumnié,” Arch. Néerl. Sci. Exactes Nat. ,2nd Ser. 12, 258–307, 490–528 (1907).
J. H. Johnson, “The Discovery of the First Four Satellites of Jupiter,” J. Brit. Astron. Assoc. 41, 164–171 (1930–1931).
P. Pagnini, “Galileo and Simon Mayr,” J. Brit. Astron. Assoc. 41, 415–422 (1930–1931).
Thomas Harriot, MS Petworth House HMC 241/IV.2.
J. O. Halliwell, ed., Letters Illustrative of the Progress of Science (Historical Society of Science, London, 1841), pp. 38–40.
S. P. Rigaud, Miscellaneous Works and Correspondence of the Rev. James Bradley (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1832).
J. Roche, “Harriot, Galileo, and Jupiter’s Satellites,” Archeion 108, (1982).
Christoph Scheiner, De macuJis solaribus (Augsburg, 1612), pp. 27–31.
P. Gassendi, Opera omnia ,Vol. 4 (Lyons, 1658).
J.-B. Delambre, Historie de l’astronomie moderne ,2 Vols. (V. Courcier, Paris, 1821).
G. Riccioli, Almagestum novum . . . (Bologna, 1651, 1653), p. 489.
P. Hérigone, Cursus mathematicus, 6 Vols. (Paris, 1634–1642), in particular Vol. 5.
H. Brown, “Nicolas Claude Fabri De Peiresc,” Dictionary of Scientific Biography ,Vol. 10, pp. 488–492 (Scribners, New York, 1974).
F. Fontana, Observationes (Naples, 1646), Tract 6, Cap. 2.
J. Hevelius, Selenographia (Dantzig, 1647), p. 526.
Galileo Galilei, Il Saggiatore (Rome, 1623), pp. 4–5.
A. Koyré, La Révolution astronomique (Vrin, Paris, 1961), Part 3.
J. D. Cassini, Mémoires pour servir a l’histoire des sciences . . . suivi de la vie de J.-D. Cassini (Bleuck, Paris, 1810.) The author is the great grandson of the subject Gian Domenico.
R. Taton, “Gian-Domenico Cassini,” Dictionary of Scientific Biography ,Vol. 3, pp. 100–104 (Scribners, New York, 1971).
G. D. Cassini, Tabulae quotidianae revolutionis macularum Jovis . . . (Rome, 1665), p. 328.
J. E. Montucla, Histoire des mathématiques (Paris, 1758), Vol. 2, p. 516.
J.-B. Du Hamel, Regiae scientiarum academia historia (Paris, 1698), p. 145.
Anon., Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences (Paris, 1707), p. 78.
I. B. Cohen, “Roemer and the First Determination of the Velocity of Light”, Isis 32, 327–79 (1940).
J. D. Cassini, “De l’origine et du progrès de l’astronomie,” in Recueil d’observations faites en plusieurs voyages. . .pour perfectionner l’astronomie et la géographie ,Messieurs de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, pp.38–39 (Paris, 1693).
R. Descartes, Oeuvres ,C. Adam and P. Tannery, editors (Vrin, Paris, 1969), Vol. 1, letter 57, pp. 307–312.
C. Huygens, Oeuvres completes (La Société Hollandaise des Sciences, Amsterdam, 1967), pp. 463–469.
R. Hooke, Micrographia (London, 1665), p. 56.
J. D. Cassini, extract from a letter written to the Journal des Sçavans printed in Phil. Trans. R. Soc ,No. 128, 681–683 (September, 1676).
Isaac Newton, Correspondence ,H. W. Turnbull, editor, p. 3 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1959).
N. L. De Lacaille, “Observations astronomiques faites à l’Isle de France pendant l’année 1753,” Mém. Acad. R. Sci. ,44–54, especially 45 (1753).
N. L. De Lacaille, “Divers observations . . . etc.,” Mém. Acad. R. Sci. ,94–130, especially 105, 120, 129, 130 (1754).
T. Eibe and K. Meyer, Ole Rømers Adversaria (Copenhagen, 1910).
O. Roemer, “Démonstration touchant le mouvement de la lumière.,” J. Sçavans 4, 233–236 (1676); translated in Phil. Trans. R. Soc ,12, 803–804 (1677).
C. Huygens, Oeuvres completes (La Société Hollandaise des Sciences, The Hague, 1899), Vol,8, pp. 30–35.
J. Pound, “New and Accurate Tables for the Ready Computing of the Eclipses of the First Satellite of Jupiter, by Addition Only,” Phil. Trans. R. S. 30, No. 361, 1021–1034, especially 1034 (1719).
P. Gassendi (tr. W. Rand), The Mirrour of True Nobility and Gentility (London, 1657).
J. Flamsteed, in Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 15, No. 178, 1262–1265, and Table 2, Fig. 2, facing 1251 (1685).
W. Whiston, A New Method for Discovering the Longitude (London, 1715).
W. Whiston, The Latitude and Longitude found by the. . . dipping needle ,(London, 1721).
J. Lalande, Astronomie (Paris, 1764), Vol. 3, pp. 197–202; second edition (Paris, 1771), Vol. 3, pp. 292–298.
J. F. Weidler, Explicatio Jovilabii Cassiniani (Wittenberg, 1727).
J. D. Cassini, “Tabulae motuum . .,” in Recueil d’observations faites en plusieurs voyages ,Messieurs de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, pp. 9, 40, 103 (Paris, 1693).
J. D. Cassini, “Les Hypothèses . .,” in Recueil d’observations faites en plusieurs voyages, Messieurs de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, p. 52 (Paris, 1693).
E. Halley, in Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 30 (361), 1021–1034 (1717–1719).
E. Halley, Tabulae astronomicae ,John Bevis, editor (London, 1749).
Isaac Newton, Principia mathematica (London, 1687), Book III, Prop. 23, Problem 5.
J.-S. Bailly, Essai sur la theorie des satellites de Jupiter (Paris, 1766).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
North, J. (1983). The Satellites of Jupiter, from Galileo to Bradley. In: van der Merwe, A. (eds) Old and New Questions in Physics, Cosmology, Philosophy, and Theoretical Biology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8830-2_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8830-2_47
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8832-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8830-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive