Comparison of Cryoprotection Techniques: A Light and Electron Microscopy Study

  • Robert F. Harrison
  • Brian L. Sheppard


The conveniences of freeze preserved human semen for artificial insemination outweigh for many clinicians the fact that frozen semen appears to be between 15-25% less effective in producing pregnancy than similar quality inseminated fresh whole semen. 1-2


Complex Medium Artificial Insemination Sodium Cacodylate Trisodium Citrate Rotunda Hospital 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Behrman, S.J. In: Techniques of artificial insemination in progress in infertility. Behrman S.J. and Kistner R.W., eds. Little Brown & Co, Boston, pp. 717, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sherman, J.K. Research on frozen human semen, past, present, future. Fertil. and Steril., 15:5, 1964.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGann, L.E. and Farrant, J. Survival of tissue culture cells frozen by a two step procedure at minus 196°C N° 1 holding temperature and time. Cryo-biol., 13:261, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rudiger, H., Wohler, W., von Bohmer, H. and Passarge, E. Cooling velocity and cell recovery. Nature, 254:361, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friberg, J. and Nilsson, O. Motility and Morphology of human sperms after freezing in liquid nitrogen. In: Current problems in fertility, Ingleman-Sundberg A. and Lunnell N.O., eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sherman, J.K. Improved methods of preservation of human spermatozoa by freezing. Fertil. Steril., 14:49, 1963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Richardson, D.W. Artificial insemination in the human. In: Modern trends in human genetics, n ° 2, Emery A.E.H. ed., Butterworths, London, pp. 404, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sadlier, R.F.M.S. The preservation of mammalian spermatozoa by freezing. Lab. Pract., 15:413, 1966.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Newton, J. Current status of artificial insemination in clinical practice, in: Proceedings of the 4th study group on artificial insemination. Brudenell, M., McLaren, A. and Short, R. Symonds, M., eds. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. pp. 25, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harrison, R.F., Stedronska, J. and Evans, P. A marking instrument for use in cryo-preservation. Brit. Med. J., 2:6028, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beck, W.W. and Silverstein, I. Variable motility recovery of spermatozoa following freeze preservation. Fertil. and Steril., 26:63, 1975.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bakst, R. and Sexton, T.J. Fertilizing capacity and ultra-structure of fowl and turkey spermatozoa before and after freezing. Reprod. Fertil., 55:1, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drevius, L.O. Permiability of the bull sperm membrane, in: Func tional anatomy of the spermatazoon. Afzelius B.A., ed., Pergamon Press New York, pp. 373, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert F. Harrison
    • 1
  • Brian L. Sheppard
    • 1
  1. 1.T.C.D. Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRotunda HospitalDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations