Basic Research Designs in Applied Behavior Analysis

  • Alan Poling
  • Deborah Grossett
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)


Applied behavior analysis relies on experimentation to assess the efficacy of interventions. Experimentation involves the measurement of one physical event, the dependent variable, under conditions where the value of a second physical event, the independent variable, is manipulated systematically. If the value of the dependent variable covaries lawfully with the value of the independent variable, a functional relation is evident. Functional relations are the basis of scientific laws; such relations allow for the prediction and control, hence the understanding, of phenomena studied as dependent variables. The logical configuring of conditions that allows changes in a dependent variable to be attributed to the actions of an independent variable is termed the experimental design. Although many specific experimental designs are capable of demonstrating functional relations, a limited number of designs are favored by applied behavior analysts. The purpose of this chapter is to describe these designs.


Target Behavior Extraneous Variable Apply Behavior Analysis Systematic Replication Behavior Analyst 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating-treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boring, E. G. (1954). The nature and history of experimental control. American Journal ofPsychology, 67, 573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bracht, G. H., & Glass, G. V. (1968). The external validity of experiments. American Educational Research Journal, 5, 437–474.Google Scholar
  5. Braam, S., & Poling, A. (1983). Development of intraverbal behavior in mentally retarded individuals through transfer of stimulus control procedures. Applied Research inMental Retardation, 4, 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs forresearch. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, V. J., Poling, A., Wysocki, T., & Breuning, S. E. (1981). Effects of phenytoin withdrawal on matching to sample and workshop performance of mentally retarded persons. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 169, 718–725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foxx, R. M., & Rubinoff, A. (1979). Behavioral treatment of caffeinism: Reducing excessive coffee drinking. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 335–344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartmann, D. P., & Hall, R. V. (1976). The changing-criterion design. Journal of AppliedBehavior Analysis, 9, 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hersen, M., & Barlow, D. H. (1976). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studyingbehavior change. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1981). Strategies and tactics of human behavioralresearch. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kazdin, A. E., & Hartmann, D. P. (1978). The simultaneous-treatment design. BehaviorTherapy, 9, 912–922.Google Scholar
  15. Kazdin, A. E., & Kopel, S. A. (1975). On resolving ambiguities of the multiple-baseline design: Problems and recommendations. Behavior Therapy, 6, 601–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kelly, M. B. (1977). A review of the observational data-collection and reliability procedures reported in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,10, 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiesler, D. J. (1971). Experimental designs in psychotherapy research. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change(pp. 36–74). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Mosk, M. D., & Bucher, B. (1984). Prompting and stimulus shaping procedures for teaching visual-motor skills to retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 23–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murphy, H. A., Hutchinson, J. M., & Bailey, J. S. (1983). Behavioral school psychology goes outdoors: The effect of organized games on playground aggression. Journal ofApplied Behavior Analysis, 16, 2–36.Google Scholar
  20. Poche, C, Brouwer, R., & Swearingen, M. (1981). Teaching self-protection to young children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 169–176. Poling, A., & Cleary, J. (in press). Within-subject designs. In K. D. Gadow & A. Poling (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Supp. 1): Methodological issues inhuman psychopharmacology. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  21. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Thompson, T. (1984). The examining magistrate for nature: A retrospective review of Claude Bernard’s An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. Journal of theExperimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 211–216.Google Scholar
  23. Ulman, J. D., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1975). Multielement baseline design in educational research. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 359–376). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Poling
    • 1
  • Deborah Grossett
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA
  2. 2.Richmond State SchoolRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations