Advertisement

Ethical Standards in Behavioral Research

A Historical Analysis and Review of Publication Practices
  • Nancy A. Neef
  • Brian A. Iwata
  • Terry J. Page
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series (NSSB)

Abstract

In a series of military experiments designed to ameliorate behavioral degradation under psychological stress, subjects were required to perform a task while being led to believe that they were in immediate danger of losing their life through a simulated plane malfunction (Berkun, Bialek, Kern, & Yagi, 1962).

Keywords

Ethical Standard American Psychological Association Behavioral Research Apply Behavior Analysis Behavior Analyst 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (1973). Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human participants. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Azrin, N. H., & Holz, W. C. (1966). Punishment. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of resarch and application (pp. 380–447). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, J. S., & Bostow, D. E. (1979). A handbook of research methods in applied behavior analysis. Tallahassee, FL: Copy Grafix.Google Scholar
  4. Berecz, J. M. (1973). Aversion by fiat: The problem of “face validity” in behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 4, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkun, M. M., Bialek, H. M., Kern, R. P., & Yagi, K. (1962). Experimental studies of psychological stress in man. Psychological Monographs, 15, 1–8.Google Scholar
  6. Berscheid, E., Baron, R. S., Dermer, M., & Libman, M. (1973). Anticipating informed consent: An empirical approach. American Psychologist, 28, 913–925.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bitgood, S. (1975). Response. In W. S. Wood (Ed.), Issues in evaluating behavior modification. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
  9. Bostow, D. E., & Bailey, J. S. (1969). Modification of severe disruptive and aggressive behavior using brief time out and reinforcement procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 31–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradshaw, C. M., Szabadi, E., & Bevan, P. (1976). Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 135–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brady, J. (1973). Behavior therapy: Fad or psychotherapy of the future? In R. Rubin, J. Brady & J. Henderson (Eds.), Advances in behavior therapy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970).Google Scholar
  13. Burchard, J. D., & Barrera, F. (1972). An analysis of timeout and response cost in a programmed environment, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 271–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Croxton, T. A., & Tropman, J. E. (1977). The new puritans. In J. E. Krapfl & E. A. Vargas (Eds.), Behaviorism and ethics (pp. 331–354). Kalamazoo, MI: Behaviordelia.Google Scholar
  15. Darrah v. Kite, 301 N.Y.S. 2d 286 (1969).Google Scholar
  16. Davison, G. C., & Stuart, R. B. (1975). Behavior therapy and civil liberties. American Psychologist, 30, 755–763.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1971). The institutional guide to DHEW policy on protection of human subjects (NIH Publication No. 72–102). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  18. Epstein, J. C., & Lasagna, L. (1969). Obtaining informed consent. Archives of Internal Medicine, 123, 682–688.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Favell, J. E., McGimsey, J. F., & Jones, M. L. (1978). The use of physical restraint in the treatment of self-injury and as positive reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 225–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedman, P. (1975). Legal regulations of behavior modification. Arizona Law Review, 17, 39–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Getchell v. Mansfield, 489 P. 2d 953 (1971).Google Scholar
  22. Goldiamond, I. (1977). Protection of human subjects and patients. In J. E. Krapfl & E. A. Vargas (Eds.), Behaviorism and ethics (pp. 129–187). Kalamazoo, MI: Behaviordelia.Google Scholar
  23. Gray, B. H. (1975). An assessment of institutional review committees in human experimentation. Medical Care, 13, 318–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar
  25. Horner, R. D. (1979). Accountability in habilitation of the severely retarded: The issue of informed consent. AAESPH Review, 4, 24–35.Google Scholar
  26. Kaimowitz v. Michigan Department of Mental Health, 42 U.S.L.W. 2063 (1973).Google Scholar
  27. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).Google Scholar
  28. Katz, J. (1972). Experimentation with human beings. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  29. Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kazdin, A. E., & Bootzin, R. B. (1972). The token economy: An evaluative review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 343–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keeley, S. M., Shemberg, K. M., & Carbonell, J. (1976). Operant clinical intervention: Behavior management or beyond? Where are the data? Behavior Therapy, 7, 292–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kelman, H. C. (1970). Deception in social research. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), The values of social science. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  33. Knecht v. Gillman, 488 F 2d 1136 (8th Cir. 1973).Google Scholar
  34. Krapfl, J. E., & Vargas, E. A. (1977). Behaviorism and ethics. Kalamazoo, MI: Behaviordelia.Google Scholar
  35. Kryspin, W. J., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1974). Writing behavioral objectves. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.Google Scholar
  36. Lasagna, L. (1969). Special subjects in human experimentation. Daedalus, 449, 456–457.Google Scholar
  37. Mackey v. Procunier, 477F 2d 877 (1973).Google Scholar
  38. Maley, R., & Hayes, S. C. (1977). Coercion and control: Ethical and legal issues. In J. E. Krapfl & E. A. Vargas (Eds.), Behaviorism and ethics (pp. 265–284). Kalamazoo, MI: Behaviordelia.Google Scholar
  39. Mann, R. A. (1972). The behavior-therapeutic use of contingency contracting to control an adult behavior problem: Weight control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 99–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin, R. (1975). Legal challenges to behavior modification. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  41. May, J. G., Risley, T. R., Twardosz, S., et al. (1975). Guidelines for the use of behavioral procedures in state programs for retarded persons. MR Research, 1.25 Google Scholar
  42. McNamara, J. R., & Woods, K. M. (1977). Ethical considerations in psychological research: A comparative review. Behavior Therapy, 8, 703–708.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Menges, R. (1973). Openness and honesty vs. coercion and deception in psychological research. American Psychologist, 28, 1030–1034.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Merriken v. Cressman, 364 F Supp 913 (1973).Google Scholar
  45. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 67, 371–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Milgram, S. (1969). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 57–75.Google Scholar
  47. Miller, R., & Willner, H. A. (1974). The two-part consent form: A suggestion for promoting free and informed consent. The New England Journal of Medicine, 290, 964–966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. O’Dell, S. (1974). Training parents in behavior modification. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 418–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Leary, K. D., & Drabman, R. (1971). Token reinforcement programs in the classroom: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Leary, D. K., O’Leary, S., & Becker, W. C. (1967). Modification of a deviant sibling interaction pattern in the home. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 5, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pappworth, M. H. (1967). Human guinea pigs: Experimentation on man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  52. Porterfield, J. K., Herbert-Jackson, E., & Risley, T. R. (1976). Contingent observation: An effective and acceptable procedure for reducing disruptive behavior of young children in a group setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 55–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Relf v. Weinberger, 372 F Supp 1196 (1974).Google Scholar
  54. Risley, T. R. (1968). The effects and side effects of punishing the autistic behavior of a deviant child. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 21–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
  56. Rosoff, A. J. (1981). Informed consent: A guide for health care providers. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.Google Scholar
  57. Schloendorff v. Society of N.Y. Hospitals, 105 N.E. 92 (1914).Google Scholar
  58. Shetter v. Rochelle, 409 P. 2d 74 (1965).Google Scholar
  59. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  61. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  62. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  63. Stolz, S. B. (1975). Ethical issues in research on behavior therapy. In W. S. Wood (Ed.), Issues in evaluating behavior modification. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  64. Stolz, S. B. (1977). Why no guidelines for behavior modification? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 541–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stuart, R. B. (1978). Protection of the right to informed consent to participate in research. Behavior Therapy, 9, 73–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stuart, R. B. (1973). Notes on the ethics of behavior research and intervention. In L. A. Hamerlynck, L. D. Handy, & E. J. Mash (Eds.), Behavior change: Methodology, concepts, and practice (pp. 221–233). Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  67. Sullivan, D. A., & Deiker, T. E. (1973). Subject-experimenter perceptions of ethical issues in human research. American Psychologist, 28, 587–591.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tramontana, J. A. (1971). A review of research on behavior modification in the home and school. Educational Technology, 11, 61–64.Google Scholar
  69. Tuskeegee Syphilis Study Ad Hoc Advisory Panel. (1973). Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Public Health Service.Google Scholar
  70. Ulrich, R. (1967). Behavior control and public concern. Psychological Record, 17, 229–234.Google Scholar
  71. Vargas, E. (1977). Rights: A behavioristic analysis. In J. E. Krapfl & E. A. Vargas (Eds.), Behaviorism and ethics. Kalamazoo, MI: Behavioredia.Google Scholar
  72. Wahler, R. G., Winkel, G. H., Peterson, R. F., & Morrison, D. C. (1965). Mothers as behavior therapists for their own children. Behavior Research and Therapy, 3, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walker, M. (1963). The nature of scientific thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  74. Waltz, J. R., & Scheuneman, T. W. (1970). Informed consent to therapy. Northwestern University Law Review, 628, 637–645.Google Scholar
  75. Warwick, D. P. (1975). Social scientists ought to stop lying. Psychology Today, pp. 105–106.Google Scholar
  76. White, G. D., Nielsen, G., & Johnson, S..M. (1972). Timeout duration and the suppression of deviant behavior in children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 111–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Willems, E. P. (1974). Behavioral technology and behavioral ecology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 151–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Winters v. Miller, 446 F 2d 65, 68 (2d dr.), cert, denied, 404 U.S. 985, 1971.Google Scholar
  79. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wolf, M., Risley, T., & Mees, H. (1964). Application of operant conditioning procedures to the behavior problems of an autistic child. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy A. Neef
    • 1
  • Brian A. Iwata
    • 2
  • Terry J. Page
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of EducationJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.The Division of Behavioral Psychology, The John F. Kennedy InstituteJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations