Skip to main content

The Experimental Investigation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Question and Bell’s Inequality

  • Chapter
Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism

Part of the book series: Physics of Atoms and Molecules ((PAMO))

Abstract

The argument of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, in 1935, concerning the completeness of quantum mechanics and the possible existence of hidden variables/0 was originally couched in terms of the position and momentum coordinates of a pair of particles which could assume a continuous range of values. Subsequently, in 1951, Bohm(2) put the argument in terms of an initially spin-0 system which dissociates into two spin-1/2 systems, the components of the spin of which could only take on discrete values. Later, in 1957, Bohm and Aharonov(3) discussed the problem with reference to the polarization properties of the γ-ray photons resulting from the annihilation of para-positronium. Then, in 1964, Bell(4) derived his inequality, which allowed a quantitative distinction to be made between the predictions of quantum mechanics and local realism, and, in 1969, Clauser et al. (5) showed how this inequality might be tested experimentally by examining the polarization properties of the two photons emitted in certain atomic cascade processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, N.J. (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Bohm and Y. Aharonov, Phys. Rev. 108, 1070 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Home, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Schrödinger, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31, 555 (1935).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. H. Furry, Phys. Rev. 49, 393 (1936).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. J. F. Clauser and A. Shimony, Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1881 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. F. M. Pipkin, in: Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics (D. R. Bates and B. Bederson, eds.), Vol. 14, pp. 281–340, Academic Press, New York (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. S. Bell, in: Proceedings of the International School in Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Course IL (B. d’Espagnat, ed.), pp. 171–181, Academic Press, New York and London (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. J. Freedman, PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. A. Kocher and E. D. Commins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 575 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. A 6, 49 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. A. Holt and F. M. Pipkin, Harvard University preprint (1974); see also Pipkin.(9)

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1223 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. F. Clauser, Nuovo Cim. B 33, 740 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. E. S. Fry and R. C. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 465 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Aspect and P. Grangier, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 43, 345 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. F. Falciglia, L. Fornari, A. Garuccio, G. Iaci, and L. Pappalardo, in: The Wave-Particle Dualism (S. Diner, G. Lochak, and F. Selleri, eds.), pp. 397–412, D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1984).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Aspect, Phys. Rev. D 14, 1944 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. T. W. Marshall, E. Santos, and F. Selleri, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 38, 417 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. F. Selleri, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 39, 252 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Pascazio, Nuovo Cim. D 5, 23 (1985).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. W. Perrie, A. J. Duncan, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1790 (1985); 54, 2647(E) (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. Breit and E. Teller, Astrophys. J. 91, 215 (1940).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Kleinpoppen, in: Book of Invited Papers, Tenth International Conference on Atomic Physics (H. Narumi and I. Shimamura, eds.), Tokyo, Japan, August 25–29 (1986), to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. J. Duncan, W. Perrie, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen, in: Book of Abstracts, Second European Conference on Atomic and Molecular Physics (A. E. de Vries and M. J. van der Wiel, eds.), p. 116, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 15–19 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. J. Duncan, in: Book of Invited Papers, Tenth International Conference on Atomic Physics (H. Narumi and I. Shimamura, eds.), p. 121, Tokyo, Japan, August 25–29 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Home, Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Haji-Hassan, A. J. Duncan, W. Perrie, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen, in: Abstracts, Tenth International Conference on Atomic Physics (H. Narumi and I. Shimamura, eds.), pp. 63–64, Tokyo, Japan, August 25–29 (1986);

    Google Scholar 

  35. T. Haji-Hassan, A. J. Duncan, W. Perrie, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen, Phys. Lett. 123A, 110 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. A. J. Duncan, in: Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism (G. Tarozzi and A. van der Merwe, eds.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1986), in press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Garuccio and F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. 103A, 99 (1984).

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. J. A. Wheeler, Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 48, 219 (1946).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 77, 242 (1949).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. L. R. Kasday, J. D. Ullman, and C. S. Wu, Nuovo Cim. B 25, 663 (1975);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. L. R. Kasday, in: Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” Course IL (B. d’Espagnat ed.), pp. 195–210, Academic Press, New York and London (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  42. C. Faraci, D. Gutkowski, S. Notarrigo, and A. S. Pennisi, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 9, 607 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. A. R. Wilson, J. Lowe, and D. K. Butt, J. Phys. G 2, 613 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. V. Paramananda and D. K. Butt, J. Phys. G (1987), in press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. Bruno, M. D’Agostino, and C. Maroni, Nuovo Cim. B 40, 143 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. M. Lamehi-Rachti and W. Mittig, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2543 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. L. Wolfenstein, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 6, 43 (1956).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. P. Catillon, M. Chapellier, and D. Garetta, Nucl. Phys. B 2, 93 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. T. K. Lo and A. Shimony, Phys. Rev. A 23, 3003 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. A. Shimony, Phys. Rev. A 30, 2130 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. F. Selleri, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 36, 521 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. J. Six, Phys. Lett. 114B, 200 (1982);

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. J. Six Contributed Paper, Lear Workshop, Tignes, Savoie, France (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  54. A. Datta and D. Home, Phys. Lett. 119A, 3 (1986).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. M. H. Tixier, in: Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism (G. Tarozzi and A. van der Merwe, eds.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1986), in press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. N. A. Törnquist, Found. Phys. 11, 171 (1981); also private communication.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. J. Summhammer, G. Badurek, H. Rauch, U. Kischko, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. A 27, 2523 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. P. Grangier, A. Aspect, and J. Vigue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 418 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. A. J. Leggett, Prog. Theor. Phys., Suppl. 69, 80 (1980).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duncan, A.J., Kleinpoppen, H. (1988). The Experimental Investigation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Question and Bell’s Inequality. In: Selleri, F. (eds) Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism. Physics of Atoms and Molecules. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8774-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8774-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8776-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8774-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics