Even Local Probabilities Lead to the Paradox

  • Franco Selleri
Part of the Physics of Atoms and Molecules book series (PAMO)

Abstract

The essence of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox(1) is the incompatibility at the experimental level between some empirical predictions of quantum theory and the consequences of local realism. This incompatibility has become fully evident after the 1965 paper by Bell(2) in which a class of local hidden-variable models was shown to lead to the validity of an inequality (“Bell’s inequality”) that is sometimes grossly violated by quantum mechanics. That pioneering work led slowly to the awareness that, more generally, it was the philosophy of local realism itself (in any traditional definition of terms locality and realism) that disagreed at the empirical level with the existing quantum theory. This striking diagreement led Stapp(3) to the conclusion that “Bell’s theorem is the most profound discovery of science.”

Keywords

Europe Rosen Summing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1965).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. P. Stapp, Nuovo Cim. B 40, 191 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Sellen and G. Tarozzi, Phys. Lett. A 119, 101 (1986).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Selleri, in: Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism (A. van der Merwe et al., eds.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1988).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Bohr, Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Capasso, D. Fortunato, and F. Selleri, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 7, 319 (1973).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. P. Wigner, Am. J. Phys. 38, 1005 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. W. Marshall, E. Santos, and F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. A 98, 5 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. A 99, 163 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Caser, Phys. Lett. A 102, 152 (1984).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Garuccio and F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. A 108, 197 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Home and T. W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. A 113, 183 (1985).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Ferrero and E. Santos, Phys. Lett. A 116, 356 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. A. Holt and F. M. Pipkin, University of Harvard, preprint (1974).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. S. Fry and R. C. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 465 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. Perrie, A. J. Duncan, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1790 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Home, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt; Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. F. Clauser and M. A. Home, Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    F. Selleri, in: Determinism in Physics (E. Bitsakis and N. Tambakis, eds.), Gutenberg, Athens (1985).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Garuccio and F. Selleri, Found. Phys. 10, 209 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franco Selleri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations