Advertisement

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox for the K0-K̄0 and B0-B̄0 Systems

  • Dipankar Home
Part of the Physics of Atoms and Molecules book series (PAMO)

Abstract

The peculiarities of nonlocal quantum correlations between space-like separated systems were highlighted by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen in their seminal paper(1) which has stimulated lively debate over the past fifty years. A well-known illustration of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) argument is Bohm’s example(2) of a spin-1/2 system decaying into two spin-1/2 particles.

Keywords

Wave Function Vector Meson Decay Product Local Realism Nonlocal Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, pp. 614–619, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1951).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3a.
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    A. Aspect and P. Grangier, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 43, 345 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    T. W. Marshall, E. Santos and F. Sellen, Phys. Lett. A 98, 5 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    T. W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. A 99, 163 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    A. Garuccio and F. Sellen, Phys. Lett. A 103, 99 (1984).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    T. W. Marshall and E. Santos, Phys. Lett. A 108, 373 (1985).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    D. Home and T. W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. A 113, 183 (1985).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    M. Ferrero and E. Santos, Phys. Lett. A 116, 356 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    T. W. Marshall, E. Santos, and F. Selleri, in: Open Questions in Quantum Physics (G. Tarozzi and A. Van der Merwe, eds.), pp. 87–101, Reidel, Dordrecht (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 13.
    T. W. Marshall, in: Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism (G. Tarozzi and A. Van der Merwe, eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht (1987).Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    T. K. Lo and A. Shimony, Phys. Rev. A 23, 3003 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    E. Santos, Phys. Rev. A 30, 2128 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 16.
    A. Shimony, Phys. Rev. A 30, 2130 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. A 108, 197 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    C. Dewdney, M. A. Dubois, P. R. Holland, A. Kyprianidis, L. Laurent, M. Pain, and J. P. Vigier, Phys. Lett. A 113, 135 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, unpublished.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    D. R. Inglis, Rev. Mod. Phys. 33, 1 (1961).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    M. Jammer, in: The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, p. 308, Wiley, New York (1974).Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    B. D’Espagnat, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 85–86, W. A. Benjamin, London (1976).Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    J. Six, Phys. Lett. B 114, 200 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 24.
    F. Selleri, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 36, 521 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 25.
    R. Armenteros et al, at: The International Conference on High Energy Physics, CERN, Geneva (1962).Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    A. Datta and D. Home, Phys. Lett. A 119, 3 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 27.
    A. J. Buras, W. Slominski, and H. Steger, Nucl. Phys. B 245, 369 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 28.
    L. B. Okun, V. I. Zakharov, and B. M. Pontecorvo, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 13, 218 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 29.
    W. H. Furry, Phys. Rev. 49, 393 (1936).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 30.
    A. Einstein, private communication to D. Bohm; cf. Ref. 31, p. 1071.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    D. Bohm and Y. Aharonov, Phys. Rev. 108, 1070 (1957);MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 31a.
    D. Bohm and Y. Aharonov, Nuovo Cim., 17, 964 (1960).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 32.
    A. Peres and P. Singer, Nuovo Cim. 15, 964 (1960).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. 33.
    M. Home, Ph.D. Thesis, pp. 82–85, Boston University (1970).Google Scholar
  36. 34.
    P. Avery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1309 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 35.
    Reported at: The XXIII International Conference on High Energy Physics, Berkeley, USA (July, 1986).Google Scholar
  38. 36.
    A. Bean et ai, CLEO-86–11 (1986).Google Scholar
  39. 37.
    I. I. Bigi, Phys. Lett. B 169, 101 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 38.
    A. J. Buras, W. Slominski, and H. Steger, Nucl. Phys. B 238, 529 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 39.
    A. Datta, D. Home, and A. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Lett. A 123, 4 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 40.
    In: Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist (P. A. Schilpp, ed.) p. 85, The Library of Living Philosophers, Inc., Evanston, Illinois (1949).Google Scholar
  43. 41.
    G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 27, 293 (1980).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 42.
    B. D’Espagnat, Phys. Rep. 110, 201 (1984).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 43.
    T. D. Lee and L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. B 138, 1490 (1965).ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. 44.
    B. D’Espagnat, private communication.Google Scholar
  47. 45.
    A. Lande, New Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, p. 124, Cambridge University Press (1965).MATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 46.
    J. L. Park and H. Margenau, in: Perspectives in Quantum Theory (W. Yourgran and A. Van der Merwe, eds.), pp. 37–70, MIT Press (1971).Google Scholar
  49. 47.
    D. Bohm, C. Dewdney, and B. J. Hiley, Nature 315, 294 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 48.
    D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2511 (1985).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dipankar Home
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsBose InstituteCalcuttaIndia

Personalised recommendations