Disruptions in Place Attachment

  • Barbara B. Brown
  • Douglas D. Perkins
Part of the Human Behavior and Environment book series (HUBE, volume 12)


A study of disruptions in psychological processes can provide unique insight into their predisruption functioning as well as the disruptions themselves and their consequences. Place attachment processes normally reflect the behavioral, cognitive, and emotional embeddedness individuals experience in their sociophysical environments. An examination of disruptions in place attachments demonstrate how fundamental they are to the experience and meaning of everyday life. After the development of secure place attachments, the loss of normal attachments creates a stressful period of disruption followed by a postdisruption phase of coping with lost attachments and creating new ones. These three phases of the disruption process are examined with respect to disruptions due to burglaries, voluntary relocations, and disasters, with special attention to the Buffalo Creek, West Virginia, flood and the Yungay, Peru, landslide. Underlying the diversity of disruptions, dialectic themes of stability-change and individuality-communality provide a coherent framework for understanding the temporal phases of attachment and its disruption.


Place Attachment Communal Identity College Freshman Communal Aspect Residential Burglary 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altaian, I., & Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology, Volume 1 (pp. 1–40). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, I., Vinsel, A., & Brown, B. B. (1981). Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Volume 14 (pp. 107–160). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthony, K. H. (1984). Moving experiences: Memories of favorite homes. In D. Duerk & D. Campbell (Eds.), The challenge of diversity (pp. 141–149). Proceedings of the Environmental Design Research Association Conference, San Luis Obispo, CA. Washington, D.C.: EDRA.Google Scholar
  4. Appleyard, D. (1981). Livable streets, protected neighborhoods. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bode, B. (1989). No bells to toll New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  6. Brolin, B. (1976). Two case studies in the application of the modern ideology. The failure of modern architecture (pp. 88–103). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, B. B. (1985). Residential territories: Cues to burglary vulnerability. Journal of Architectural Planning and Research, 2, 231–243.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, B. B. (1987a, May). Feelings toward the previous home after relocation. Poster presented at the Environmental Design Research Association Conference, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, B. B. (1987b, August). Residential proximity and social relations. Symposium presentation at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, B. B., & Harris, P. B. (1989). Residential, burglary victimization: Reactions to the invasion of primary territory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, B. B., & Werner, C. M. (1985). Social cohesiveness, territoriality, and holiday decorations: The influence of cul-de-sacs. Environment and Behavior, 17, 539–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caplow, T. (1984). Rule enforcement without visible means: Christmas gift giving in Mid-dletown. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 1306–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chavis, D., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chokor, B. A. (1988). Cultural aspects of place consciousness and environmental identity. In D. Canter, M. Krampen, & D. Stea (Eds.), Environmental perspectives (pp. 54–71). Hants, England: Gower.Google Scholar
  15. Cochrane, T. (1987). Place, people, and folklore: An Isle Royale case study. Western Folklore, 46, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coelho, G. V., Hamburg, D. A., & Murphey, E. B. (1976). Coping strategies in a new learning environment: A study of college freshmen. In R. Moos (Ed.), Human adaptation: Coping with life crises (pp. 128–138). Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
  17. Colson, E. (1971). The social consequences of resettlement. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Dynes, R. R., Billings, D., & Maggard, S. (1978). Two views of an award winning book. Social Forces, 57, 721–722.Google Scholar
  20. Edelstein, M. R. (1988). Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  21. Erikson, K. (1976). Everything in its path: Destruction of community in the Buffalo Creek flood. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Eyles, J. (1989). The geography of everyday life. In D. Gregory & R. Walford (Eds.), Horizons in human geography (pp. 102–117). Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
  23. Feldman, R. M. (1990). Settlement-identity: Psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society. Environment and Behavior, 22, 183–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fischer, C. S., Jackson, R. M., Stueve, C. A., Gerson, K., Jones, L. M., & Baidassare, M. (1977). Networks and places. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fisher, S., Frazer, N., & Murray, K. (1986). Homesickness and health in boarding school children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisher, S., Murray, K., & Frazer, N. (1985). Homesickness, health, and efficiency in first year students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fried, M. (1963). Grieving for a lost home. In L. J. Duhl (Ed.), The urban condition (pp. 151–171). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Gauvain, M., Altman, I., & Fahim, H. (1983). Homes and social change: A cross-cultural analysis. In N. R. Feimer & E. S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives (pp. 180–218). New York Praeger.Google Scholar
  29. Guiliani, M. V. (1989, August). The meaning and use of home and neighborhood. Paper presented at the International Housing Symposium, Gavle, Sweden.Google Scholar
  30. Gurwitt, R. (1990). Aftershocks. Governing, 3(6), 28–33.Google Scholar
  31. Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1965). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kasarda, J., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marris, P. (1986). Loss and change (2nd ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  34. Merry, S. E. (1981). Urban danger: Life in a neighborhood of strangers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Oliver-Smith, T. (1986). The martyred city: Death and rebirth in the Andes. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  36. Packard, V. (1972). A nation of strangers. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
  37. Perkins, D. D., Florin, P., Rich, R. C., Wandersman, A., & Chavis, D. M. (1990). Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 83–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Relph, E. (1975). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  40. Rivlin, L. G. (1987). The neighborhood, personal identity, and group affiliations. In I. Altman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Neighborhood and community environments (pp. 1–34). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  41. Shumaker, S. A., & Taylor, R. B. (1983). Toward a clarification of people-place relationships. In N. Feimer & S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives (pp. 219–251). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  42. Stenross, B. (1984). Police response to residential burglaries. Criminology, 22, 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and environment (pp. 441–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Stokols, D., Shumaker, S. A., & Martinez, J. (1983). Residential mobility and personal well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stern, G. M. (1976). The Buffalo Creek disaster. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, R. B. (1988). Human territorial functioning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, R. B., & Perkins, D. D. (1989). Predicting block-level changes in anxiety and depression: The impact of citizen participation and fear of crime. In R. B. Taylor (Ed.), Mental health: Adaptive coping with urban crime and fear (Report to NIMH, No. R01MH40842). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.Google Scholar
  48. Titchener, J. L., & Kapp, F. T. (1976). Family and character change at Buffalo Creek. American Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 295–299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Tuan, I. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  50. Vinsel, A., Brown, B. B., Airman, I., & Foss, C. (1980). Privacy regulation, territorial displays, and the effectiveness of individual functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1104–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Webber, M. M. (1970). Order in diversity: Community without propinquity. In R. Gutman & D. Popenoe (Eds.), Neighborhood, city, and metropolis (pp. 792–781). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  52. Wofsey, E., Rierdan, J., & Wapner, S. (1979). Planning to move: effects on representing the currently inhabited environment. Environment and Behavior, 11, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara B. Brown
    • 1
  • Douglas D. Perkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Family and Consumer Studies, Environment and Behavior AreaUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations