Thresholds to an Alternate Realm

Mapping the Chaseworld in New Jersey’s Pine Barrens
  • Mary Hufford
Part of the Human Behavior and Environment book series (HUBE, volume 12)


Folklorists tend to study cultures and communities by paying close attention to stylized genres or traditional expressive behaviors. In recent decades as the emphasis in the field of folklore has shifted from studies that are text centered to studies that are more context oriented, a number of folklorists have turned their attention to the interrelations of tradition and environment. Of all genres attached to places, narratives and place names traditionally have drawn the most attention from folklorists. In particular, folklorists have long sensed a deep connection between legendry and topography (Dorson, 1971) and have undertaken studies of migratory legends, and the role of physical settings, in nurturing narrative traditions (Honko, 1981; Moss, 1983). Gradually the collection and study of folklore as static migratory items has developed into the investigation of the reciprocity between traditional genres and their settings (Allen, 1990). Folklore, which “vivifies place” is seen to be inspired and reinforced by distinctive physical features in the local setting (Moss, 1983). Lauri Honko notes that when “milieu dominants” as he calls such features, are constituted as places, their names become a powerful means of perpetuating local tradition (Cochrane, 1987; Honko, 1981). Other scholars have explored ways in which communities use traditional materials both to enhance their sense of belonging within a locale or region and to distinguish themselves from outsiders (Jones, 1976).


State Forest Place Attachment Pine Barren Narrative Tradition Finite Province 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrahams, R. D. (1977). Toward an enactment-centered approach to folklore. In W. R. Bascom (Ed.), Frontiers of folklore (pp. 5–120). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, B. (1990). Regional studies in folklore scholarship. In B. Allen, & R. J. Schlereth (Eds.), Sense of place: Essays in American regional culture (pp. 1–13). Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  3. Bateson, G. (1972). Toward a theory of play and fantasy. In Steps to an ecology of mind (pp. 177–193). New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  5. Brady, E. (1989). Debatable land: Frontier versus wilderness in the Ozark National Scenic Waterways. In J. Hardin & A. Jabbour (Eds.), Folklife annual (pp. 46–57). Washington, DC-Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  6. Bunkse, E. V. (1978). Commoner attitudes toward landscape and nature. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 68, 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cochrane, T. (1987, October). Folklore and the geographical character of two national parks. Paper delivered at the American Folklore Society Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  8. Dorson, R. (1971). How shall we rewrite Charles M. Skinner today? In W. D. Hand (Ed.), American folk legend: A symposium (pp. 69–95). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Douglas, M. (1973). Rules and meanings. Middlesex, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Fernandez, J. (1986). Persuasions and performances: The play of tropes in culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fox, M. W. (1971). Behavior of wolves, dogs, and related canids. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  13. Garfinkel, H. (1973). Background expectancies. In M. Douglas (Ed.), Rules and meanings (pp. 21–23). Middlesex, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
  15. Honko, L. (1981). Four forms of adaptation of tradition. Studia Fennica, 26, 19–33.Google Scholar
  16. Howe, J. (1981). Foxhunting as ritual. American Ethnologist, 8, 278–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hufford, M. (1986). One space, many places: Folklife and land use planning in New Jersey’s Pinelands National Reserve. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  18. Hufford, M. (1990). One reason God made trees: The form and ecology of the Barnegat sneakbox. In B. Allen & R. Schlereth (Eds.), A sense of place: American regional cultures (pp. 40–57). Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  19. Hufford, M. (1992). Chaseworld: Foxhunting and storytelling in New Jersey’s Pine Barrens. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, S. (1976). Regionalization: A rhetorical strategy. Journal of the Folklore Institute, 13, 105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lansing, J. S. (1979). In the world of the sea urchin: The application of husserlian phenomenology to cultural symbols. In A. L. Becker & Aran Yengoyan (Eds.), The imagination of reality (pp. 75–83). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Moss, J. C. (1983). Land and legend: The role of place in the folk narrative of Chester County, Pennsylvania. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  23. Natanson, M. (1962). Literature, philosophy, and the social sciences. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  24. Natanson, M. (1970). The journeying self. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  25. Ricoeur, P. (1967). Husserl: An analysis of his phenomenology. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Schutz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations (H. Wagner, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Shafer, R. M. (1985). Acoustic space. In D. Seamon & R. Mugerauer (Eds.), Dwelling, place and environment: Towards a phenomenology of person and world (pp. 87–98). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  28. Simmel, G. (1971). On individuality and social forms (D. Levine, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Stanley, D. (1984). National parks as cultural artifacts. In R. Hart (Ed.), Parks in the West (pp. 8–12). Sun Valley Idaho: Institute of the American West.Google Scholar
  30. Toelken, B. (1979). The dynamics of folklore. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  31. Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  34. Uexküll, J. von. (1982). Theory of meaning. trans. Thure von Uexkull for special issue of Semiotica, 42, 1–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Young, K. G. (1987). Taleworlds and storyrealms: The phenomenology of narrative. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Hufford
    • 1
  1. 1.Library of CongressAmerican Folklife CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations