RIM Urethanes Structure/Property Relationships for Linear Polymers

  • Richard J. Zdrahala
  • Frank E. Critchfield
Part of the Polymer Science and Technology book series (POLS, volume 18)


Reaction Injection Molding (RIM) technology represented the major break-through in the polymer processing development of the seventies. This technology, based on the rapid mixing of co-reactive streams and subsequent feeding of the mixture into the polymerization reactor — the mold, — allows for production of large and intricate parts. The relatively low energy input that is required makes this technology especially attractive for today’s needs.

Polyurethanes are perfectly suited for RIM. The fast and exothermic reaction typical for urethane formation does not generate any low molecular weight byproducts. And by the selection of different intermediates, the properties of the resultant polymer can be broadly varied.

In order to investigate the structure/property development of linear RIM urethanes, a series of polyether-based linear (thermoplastic) polyurethanes (TPU) varying in the hard segment content between 20 and 80 weight percent was prepared. 4,4′-Diphenyl-methane diisocyanate (MDI) and 1,4-butanediol (BDO) were the hard segment intermediates. (Oxypropylene-oxyethylene) diols of M̄n = 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 were used as the soft segments. Physical-mechanical, dynamic-mechanical and specific heat (DSC) are used to elucidate the mechanical and morphological behavior of the materials. The polyurethanes varied from soft elastomerics (continuous soft phase) to high-modulus plastics (continuous hard phase) with a possible phase inversion at about 60 percent hard segment.


Hard Segment Soft Segment Flexural Modulus Soft Phase Thermoplastic Polyurethane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. J. Zdrahala, R. H. Gerkin, S. L. Hager and F. E. Critchfield, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 24, 2041 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. L. Hager, Thermo chimica Acta, 26, 149 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. J. Massa, J. Appl. Phys., 44, 2595 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. G. Seefried Jr., J. V. Koleske and F. E. Critchfield, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 19, 2503 (1975);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4a.
    C. G. Seefried Jr., J. V. Koleske and F. E. Critchfield, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., , 19, 3185 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    L. L. Harrell Jr., Macromolecules, 2, 607 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    T. Kajiyama and W. J. MacKnight, Polymer J., 1, 548 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7a.
    A. L. Chang and E. L. Thomas, “Multiphase Polymers,” pp. 31–52; S. L. Cooper and G. M. Ester, Eds., ACS, Washington, DC, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 7b.
    C. S. Schollenberger, ibid, pp. 83–96.Google Scholar
  10. 7c.
    J. W. C Van Bogardt, A. Lilaonitkul and S. L. Cooper, ibid, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard J. Zdrahala
    • 1
  • Frank E. Critchfield
    • 1
  1. 1.Silicones and Urethane Intermediates DivisionUnion Carbide CorporationSouth CharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations