Strong and Weak CP Violation at LEAR

  • E. Gabathuler
  • P. Pavlopoulos
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS, volume 17)


The intense and clean beams of antiprotons which will become a reality at LEAR (the Low-Energy Antiproton Ring) open up the possibility of resolving many of the problems in existing low-energy antiproton physics, which are largely brought about by a lack of flux. It is interesting to ask the question, “What else can be done at LEAR apart from a study of antiproton interactions?”


Neutral Kaon Grand Unification Charged Kaon Neutral Decay Clean Beam 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    E. Gabathuler, G. Veneziano and P. Pavlopoulos, Axions, ghosts and pseudocalars at LEAR, preprint CERN-EP/82–45, to be published in Phys. Lett. B.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. C. Rossi, Baryonium in quark models, Invited paper at this conference.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. K. Kabir, The CP puzzle, Academic Press, London and New York (1968).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. E. Marshak, Riazuddin and C. P. Ryan, Theory of weak interactions in particle physics, Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1969).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. D. Commins, Weak interactions, McGraw-Hill Advanced Physics Monograph Series, McGraw-Hill, New York (1973).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Kleinknecht, Ann. Rev. Phys. 29:1 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. L. Chan Wang, in Proc. 20th Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics, Madison, Wisconsin, 1980, L. Durand and G. Pondrom eds. American Institute of Physics, New York (1981).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. D. Lee, Phys. Rep. Phys. Lett. Sect. C. 9:143 (1974).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Banner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 28:1597 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Holder et al., Phys. Lett. 40B:141 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. D. Lee, Phys. Rev. D8:1226 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. 65B:141 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. B. Lahanas and N. J. Papadopoulos, Phys. Rev. D19:2158 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Jacquot, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 26:155 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37:657 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Deshpande and E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D16:1583 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Ali and Z. Aydin, Nucl. Phys. B148:165 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. A. Anselm and D. I. Dyakonov, Nucl. Phys. B145:271 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D6:2023 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. N. Mohapatra, J. Pati and L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D11:3319 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. N. Mohapatra and J. Pati, Phys. Rev. D 11:566 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Kobayashi and K. Maskawa, Progr. Theor. Phys. 49:652 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Ellis, M. Gaillard and D. V. Nanopoulos, Nucl. Phys. B109:213 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Faissner, in Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics, Kiev, 1970, Noukova Dumka, Kiev (1972).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. G. Kenny and R. G. Sachs, Phys. Rev. D8:1605 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. K. Kabir, Phys. Rev. D2:540 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Gabathuler
    • 1
  • P. Pavlopoulos
    • 2
  1. 1.CERNGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Institute of PhysicsUniversity of BasleSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations