Calculations of p̄p → ȲY Near Threshold

  • R. A. Eisenstein
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS, volume 17)


The reactions p̄p ȲY will soon be studied1,2 near threshold at LEAR. Comparison of theoretical calculations with the measured differential cross sections, polarizations and spin correlations may help to determine the role of various meson exchange terms and the extent to which quark degrees of freedom are important. Calculations along these lines are in progress and are described briefly below.


Born Approximation Final State Interaction Meson Exchange Distorted Wave Born Approximation Strange Meson 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    LEAR Proposal CERN/PSCC/81–69 PSCC/P49. “Study of Threshold Production of p̄p ȲY at LEAR”: CERN: X. Kilian, S. Polikanov; Carnegie-Mellon: P. D. Barnes, R. A. Eisenstein, G. Franklin, R. Grace, C. Maher, R. Reider, W. Wharton; Erlangen: W. Eyrich, A. Hof mann, H. Ortner; Freiburg: J. Franz, G. Nicklas, E. Rössie, H. Schmitt; Los Alamos: B. Bonner; Saclay: P. Birien; Uppsala: T. Johansson.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. A. Eisenstein, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. L. Perl, “High Energy Hadron Physics”, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1974).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Jacob and G. C. Wick, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 7, 404 (1959).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. I. Schiff, “Quantum Mechanics”, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York (1968).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Durand, III and J. Sandweiss, Phys. Rev. 135, B540 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. B. Dover and J.-M. Richard, Phys. Rev. C25, 1952 (1982) and references cited therein.ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. J. Sopkovich, Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University (1962).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Saleem and M. Ali, Lett, al Nuovo Cimento 32, 425 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Sadoulet, Nuc. Phys. B53, 135 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Plaut, Nuc. Phys. B35, 221 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, J. M. Richard, R. Vinh Mau, Phys. Rev. C21, 861 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Côté, M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, B. Mousallam, R. Vinh Mau, Phys. Rev. Letters 48, 1319 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. M. Nagels, T. A. Rijken, J. J. De Swart, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 79, 338 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Becker, G. Blanar, W. Blum, V. Chaband, J. de Groot, H. Dietl, J. Gallivan, W. Kern, E. Lorenz, G. Lutjeus, G. Lutz, W. Manner, R. Mount, D. Notz, R. Richter, U. Stierlin, M. Turala, Nuc. Phys. B141, 48 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Eisenstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentCarnegie-Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations