Advertisement

Process Stream Analysis by X-Ray Spectroscopy

  • R. H. Munch
Part of the Developments in Applied Spectroscopy book series (DAIS, volume 3)

Abstract

X-ray fluorescence equipment now available for continuous plant process stream analysis can simultaneously or sequentially analyze for several elements. The type of instrument chosen should depend on process conditions and requirements. Equally as important as the instrument is the sample-handling system. Maintenance of instrument and sampling system are also vital. Finally, optimum use of the data provided by the system must be made. A well-chosen, well-engineered application can have great value.

Keywords

Process Stream Improve Product Quality Mass Absorption Coefficient Stream Analyzer Lead Tetraethyl 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. L. Fuller and P. E. McNarry, Engineering and Mining Journal (April, 1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. L. Holderreed and W. Lucy, Mining Coneress Journal (July, 1960).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams. Hoffman and J.W. Pastorius, “X-Ray Analysis and Control of a Cement Plant Raw Mix,” presented at A.I.E.E. Cement Industry Conference, April 3–5, 1962, St. Louis, Mo.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. E. Cook, Nonmetallic Minerals Processing (March, 1962).Google Scholar
  5. J. W. Kemp, “Instruments for Production and Process Control,” in Handbook of X-Rays, Emmett Kaelble (editor) (in preparation).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.R. Kiley, “Application of On-Stream Analysis to Various Mineral Beneficiation Processes,” Norelco Reporter Vol X, No. 2 (1963), p. 66.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F.L. Abboud, F. Bernstein, A.D. Furbee, andC.H. Hailey, “The X-Ray Emission Gauge,” A.I,E.E. paper 62–656, Great Lakes District Meeting, April 25–27, 1962.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.D. Furbee, “On-Llne Type X-Ray Emission Analyzer Systems,” Tenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-Ray Analysis, August 7–9, 1961.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. F. Loranger, “On-Line Process Analysis by X-Ray Emission Technique,” 12th Annual Symposium on Spectroscopy, Chicago, Illinois, May 16, 1961.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W.F. Loranger and R.G. Edholm, Mining Congress Journal, p. 51 (October, 1961).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.S. Hoffman and J.W. Pastorius “WhitehaU’s Experience with the X-Ray Emission Gauge,” GTC 1962 Fall Meeting, September 10–13, 1962, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    “Automatic Control of Chemical and Petroleum Processes,” Gulf Publishing Co., Houston, Texas, 1961.Google Scholar
  13. P.S. Goodwin, “The Quantrol as Tin Coating Weight Gauge,” Analytical Systems Division, Application Report, Applied Research Laboratories.Google Scholar
  14. P.S. Goodwin and R.H. Prowett, “Plating Thickness Measurements of Electrolytic Brass, Copper, Nickel and Zinc on Mild Steel Using the A.R.L. Quantrol,” ibid.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P.S. Goodwin. Control Engineering, 5:94–99 (August, 1958).Google Scholar
  16. A. E. Bernhard, “Some On-Line Applications of X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry,” LS.A. Winter Automation Conference, St. Louis, Mo., January 17–19, 1961, Preprint No. 18SL61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chicago Section of the Society for Applied Spectroscopy 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. H. Munch
    • 1
  1. 1.Monsanto Chemical CompanySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations