Advertisement

Effects of Substituents in Polycyclic Heterocyclic Compounds

  • Petr Zuman

Abstract

For polycyclic heterocyclic compounds containing one or more heterocyclic nuclei of aromatic or nonaromatic character, together with one or more benzene or hydroaromatic rings, the systematic treatment of constitutive effects is rather involved. The types of systems are more numerous than in the case of monocyclic heterocyclic compounds : the electroactive group may be either in a heterocyclic or in a benzene ring ; similarly, the substituent also may be either in a heterocyclic or in a benzene ring and, moreover, it may be either in the same ring as the electroactive group or in another ring. Finally, the number of types of reaction series is increased by the possibility that in the system of condensed rings the electro-reduction or -oxidation of one of the rings may be considerably facilitated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Patzak and L. Neugebauer, Monatsh. Chem. 83: 776 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Dezelic and M. Trkovnik, Croat. Chem. Acta 33: 209 (1961).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Györbiró, J. Electroanal. Chem. 2: 259 (1961).Google Scholar
  4. G. Sartori and C. Furlani, Ann. Chim. 45: 251 (1955).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Curti and S. Locchi, Ann. Chim. 45: 1244 (1955).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Komenda, Collection Czech. Chem. Commun. 26: 212 (1961).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ju. S. Rozum, Biokhimiya 20: 66 (1955).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Kabasakalian and J. McGlotten, Anal. Chem. 31: 431 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Necajeva and Z. V. Puskareva, Zh. Obshch. Khim. 28: 2693 (1958).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. B. Radina, Z. V. Puskareva, N. M. Voronina, and N. M. Chvorova, Zh. Obshch. Khim. 30: 3480 (1960).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Q. Fernando and J. P. Phillips, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74: 3103 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Bocquet and R. A. Paris, Anal. Chim. Acta 15: 492 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. P. Strier and J. C. Cavagnol, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80: 1565 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. C. Kaye and M. L. Stonehill, J. Chem. Soc. 1951: 2638.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. G. Frost and J. H. Saylor, Rec. Tray. Chim. 83: 340 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. P. Kottenhahn, E. T. Seo, and H. W. Stone, J. Org. Chem. 28: 3114 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Volke and V. Szabó, Chem. Listy 50: 1095 (1956).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Oshima, M. Kijutani, and K. Ueda, J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 27: 98 (1953).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Dabard, Compt. Rend. 244: 1651 (1957).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Dabard, Thesis, Dijon, 1962.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Tirouflet, R. Robin, and M. Guyard, Bull. Soc. Chim. France 1956: 571.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Tirouflet and R. Dabard, Compt. Rend. 242: 2839 (1956).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Furlani, Gazz. Chim. Ital. 85: 1646, 1668 (1955).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. V. Varjuchina and Z. V. Puskareva, Zh. Obshch. Khim. 26: 1740 (1956).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Cassebaum, Z. Elektrochem. 58: 515 (1954).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    W. E. Whitman and L. A. Wiles, J. Chem. Soc. 1956: 3016.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. Curti, S. Locchi, and U. Landini, Rend. Accad. Naz. 18: 78 (1955).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. Smith, H. G. Sprague, and O. C. Elmer, Anal. Chem. 25: 793 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. Tirouflet, Bull. Chem. Soc. France 1956: 27.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. Zahradnik and K. Bocek, Collection Czech. Chem. Commun. 26: 1733 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. Vlachovâ, R. Zahradnik, K. Antos, P. Kristian, and A. Hulka, Collection Czech. Commun. 27: 2826 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    P. Zuman, Chem. Listy 48: 94 (1954).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    R. Riccardi and M. Bresesti, Ann. Chim. 48: 826 (1954).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    O. Dimroth, Angew. Chem. 46: 511 (1933); Chemiker-Zt. 62: 454 (1958).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    K. Schwabe and H. Berg, Z. physikal. Chem. (Leipzig) 204: 18 (1955).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    H. Berg, Chem. Tech. 85: (1956).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    V. Preininger, H. Potésilovâ, and F. Šantavÿ, Chem. Listy 52: 25 (1958).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petr Zuman
    • 1
  1. 1.Heyrovský Institute of PolarographyCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPragueCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations