Advertisement

Effects of Substituents in Condensed Polycyclic Hydrocarbons

  • Petr Zuman

Abstract

In passing from benzene derivatives to derivatives of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, we meet the additional possibility of substitution in a ring other than that carrying the electroactive group. Furthermore, the reduction or oxidation can take place in the aromatic nucleus. And finally, it is possible to compare the polarographic behaviors of compounds containing the same polarographically active group in various positions in the ring system and even of compounds containing the same group in various ring systems, e.g., benzene, naphthalene, and anthracene. The limited experimental data allow only an approximate treatment of such comparisons.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. C. Price, E. C. Mertz, and J. Wilson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76: 5131 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. K. Cremer, A. Fisher, B. R. Mann, J. Packer, R. B. Richards, and J. Vaughan, J. Org. Chem. 26: 3148 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. R. Wells and E. R. Ward, Chem. Ind. 1958: 528.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. H. Jaffé, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76: 4261 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Lauer, Ber. 70B: 1288 (1937).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. P. Hammett,“Organic Chemistry,” p. 184, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1940.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Schenkel, Experientia 4: 383 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. F. Hall and R. M. Sprinkle, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 54: 3469 (1932).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Otsuji, M. Kubo, and E. Imoto, Bull. Univ. Osaka Prefecture 7A: 61 (1959).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Nakaya, H. Kinoshita, and S. Ono, J. Chem. Soc. Japan 78: 940 (1957).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Imoto, Rev. Polarog. 9: 185 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. H. Klemm and A. J. Kohlik, J. Org. Chem. 28: 2044 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. H. Klemm, A. J. Kohlik, and K. B. Desai, J. Org. Chem. 28: 625 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. H. Chopard-dit-Jean and E. Heilbronner, Helv. Chim. Acta 36: 144 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. H. Klemm, W. C. Solomon, and A. J. Kohlik, J. Org. Chem. 27: 2777 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. W. Loveland and G. R. Dimeler, Anal. Chem. 33: 1196 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Beckmann and H. Silberman, Chem. Ind. 1955: 1635.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. Starka and A. Vystréil, Chem. Listy 51: 1449 (1957).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Gerdil and E. Heilbronner, Hely. Chim. Acta 40: 141 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Imoto, R. Motoyma and H. Kakiuchi, Bull. Naniwa Univ. 3A: 203 (1955).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. N. Schmid and E. Heilbronner, Helv. Chim. Acta 37: 1453 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Calzolari and C. Furlani, Ann. Chini. 44: 356 (1954), Bull. Sci. Fac. chim. ind. (Bologna) 12: 14 (1954).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. Calzolari, Ann. Triestini 1954: No. 1 16 pp.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    F. Goulden and F. L. Warren, Biochem. J. 42: 420 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    I. Bergman and J. C. James, Trans. Faraday Soc. 48: 956 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. Holleck and H. J. Exner, Naturwissenschaften 39: 159 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. Zahradnik and K. Bocek, Collection Czech. Chem. Commun. 26: 1733 (1961).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    I. F. Vladimircev and I. J. Postovskij, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 83: 855 (1952).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. Moelants and R. Janssen, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 66: 209 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. Gergely and T. Iredale, J. Chem. Soc. 1951, 3502.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    E. L. Colichman and S. K. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76: 913 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    E. S. Levin and Z. I. Fodiman, Zh. Fiz. Khim. 28: 601 (1954).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    D. Vlachova, R. Zahradnik, K. Antos, B. Kristian, and A. Hulka, Collection Czech. Chem. Commun. 27: 2826 (1962).Google Scholar
  34. K. Schwabe, Chem. Tech. (Berlin) 9: 126 (1957).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    H. Lund. Acta Chem. Scand. 11: 491 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    L. P. Hammett, “Physical Organic Chemistry,” p. 188, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1940.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    H. H. Jaffé, Chem. Rev. 53: 1919 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    S. Ono and M. Uehara, Bull. Univ. Osaka Prefect 5A: 139 (1957).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    R. A. Nash, D. M. Skauen, and W. C. Purdy, J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. Sci. Ed. 47: 433 (1958).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    L. Holleck and R. Schindler, Z. Elektrochem. 60: 1138, 1142 (1956).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    P. J. Elving and E. C. Olson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79: 2697 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petr Zuman
    • 1
  1. 1.Heyrovský Institute of PolarographyCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPragueCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations