Advertisement

Crystal Field Excitations in CeAgl−xInx Compounds

  • H. Wehr
  • K. Knorr
  • A. P. Murani
  • W. Assmus

Abstract

The substitution of the monovalent Ag for the trivalent In in LaAgl−xInx and CeAgl−xInx offers the possibility of influencing the conduction electron system in these compounds. The strong dependence of the spin susceptibility of La-systems on the In-concentration1 was interpreted by band calculations which suggest that the Fermi level is pushed into a region of a high 5d-eg-band density of states2. Furthermore, CeAgl−xInx is one of the rare 4f systems where a structural phase transition (from cubic to tetragonal) occurs prior to magnetic ordering. The ferromagnetic Curie temperature TC is roughly independent of x whereas the structural transition temperature Ts rises from 15 K for CeAg to about 120 K for GeAg0.8In0.2 3,4. The simple fact that the dependence of Ts on x is almost identical for the Ce- and La-compounds shows that the early view put forward by Ray and Sivardiere5 that the structural transition is driven by the interacting electric quadrupoles of the 4f states is incorrect. Nevertheless, the reduced lattice symmetry should affect the magnetic properties below Ts via the crystal field (CEF).

Keywords

Structural Phase Transition Neutron Spectrum Inelastic Neutron Knight Shift Spin Susceptibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Ihrig, D.T. Vigren, J. Kuebler and S. Methfessel, Phys. Rev. B8, 4525 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Hasegawa, B. Bremicker and J. Kuebler, Z. Physik B22, 231 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Ihrig and S. Methfessel, Z. Physik B24, 385 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Assmus, R. Takke, R. Sommer and B. Liithi, J. Phys. C11, L575 (1978).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.K. Ray and J. Sivardiere, Solid State Comm. 19, 1053 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Pierre, A.P. Murani. in: Crystalline Electric Field and Structural Effects in f-Electron Systems, J.E. Crow, R.P. Guertin and T.W. Mihalisin, eds., Plenum Press, New York (1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Williams and L. Hirst, Phys. Rev. 185 407 (1969).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.W. Becker, P. Fulde and J. Keller, Z. Physik B28, 9 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Wehr et al., (this conference).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Pierre, P. Morin and D. Schmitt, J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 8, 249 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Eiling and J.S. Schilling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 364 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Takke, N. Dolezal, W. Assmus and B. Liithi, J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 23, 247 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Knorr, B. Renker, W. Assmus, R. Takke, B. Liithi and H.J. Lauter, Z. Physik B39, 151 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Wehr
    • 1
  • K. Knorr
    • 1
  • A. P. Murani
    • 2
  • W. Assmus
    • 3
  1. 1.Inst. f. PhysikUniversität MainzMainzGermany
  2. 2.Inst. Laue-LangevinGrenobleFrance
  3. 3.Physikal. Inst.Universität FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations