Role of Coupling Factor B in the Fo Proton Channel

  • Youguo Huang
  • Lakshmi Kantham
  • D. Rao Sanadi


The electrochemical proton gradient generated during the oxidations in the respiratory chain is known to be utilized for the synthesis of ATP from ADP and inorganic phosphate by the ATP synthase (H+- ATPase of Fo — F1. In this process, H+ reenters the mitochondria through a specific proton channel located in the membrane-embedded Fo segment. The proton channel of E. coli Fo contains three proteins, all of which are necessary for H+ conduction, but the mitochondrial Fo is more complex and contains at least six subunits: subunit 6, subunit 9, URFAGL gene product, OSCP (oligomycin sensitivity conferring protein), F6 (coupling factor 6), and FB (coupling factor B). F6 and OSCP are believed to be involved in the binding of F1 to Fo in the correct manner to render the ATPase activity sensitive to oligomycin (1), and indirect evidence has implicated FB in the H+ channel (2). Three properties of FB, a 14 kdalton dithiol protein, have been useful in identifying its role in the ATP synthase reaction. They are a) resolution of FB from submitochondrial particles concomitant with loss of activity in energy-linked reactions and reactivation by reconstitution of FB into the particle (3, 4), b) specific inhibition of FB, activity by Cd2+ in the presence of excess monothiol which restricts binding of Cd2+ to a dithiol site (5, 6) and c) retention of Cd2+ on Fb during SDS-PAGE (6, 7).


Coupling Factor Diffusion Potential Proton Channel Submitochondrial Particle Electrochemical Proton Gradient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sandri, G., Wojtczak, L. and Ernster, I. (1985) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 239, 595–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanadi, D.R., Pringle, M.J., Kantham, L., Hughes, J.B. and Srivastave, A. (1984) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 1371–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lam, K.W., Warshaw, J.B. and Sanadi, D.R. (1966) Arch. Biochem. Biohys. 119, 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joshi, S., Hughes, J.B., Shaikh, F. and Sanadi, D.R. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 10145–10152.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joshi, S. and Hughes, J.B. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 1112–1116.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kantham, B.C.L., Hughes, J.B., Pringle, M.J. and Sanadi, D.R. (1984) J. Biol. Che. 259, 10627–10632.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sanadi, D.R., Joshi, S., Huang, Yu., Kantham, L., Pringle, M.J. and Hughes, J.B., (1985) in: Achievements and Perspectives of Mitochondrial Research, (E. Quaglierello et al. eds.) 269–277Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanadi, D.R. (1982) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 683, 39–50.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Joshi, S., Kantham, L., Kaplay, S. and Sanadi, D.R. (1985) FEBS Let 179, 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Torchinsky, Yu. M. (1981) in: Sulfur in Proteins, Pergamon Press, 113–132.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanazawa, H., Mabuchi, K., Miki, T., Tamura, F. and Futai, M. (1980) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 7005–7009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gay, N.J., and Walker, J.E. (1981) Nucl. Acids Res. 9, 3919–3926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nielsen, J.K, Hansen, F.G., Hoppe, J., Friedl, P. and von Meyenberg, K. (1981) Mol. Gen. Genet. 184, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sarate, M., Gay, N.J., Eberle A., Runswick, M.J. and Walker, J.E. (1981) Nucl. Acid Res. 9, 5287–5296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Youguo Huang
    • 1
  • Lakshmi Kantham
    • 1
  • D. Rao Sanadi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cell PhysiologyBoston Biomedical Research InstituteBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations