Advertisement

A Comparison of Ionization-Chamber and Liquid-Scintillation Methods for Measurement of Beta Emitters

  • V. P. Guinn
  • C. D. Wagner

Abstract

At the outset it should be remarked that there is no unequivocal general method of comparing the ionization-chamber and liquid scintillation methods for the measurement of beta emitters. For a useful comparison, one must make arbitrary, but reasonable and specific, assumptions, and then carry out calculations in a reliable statistical manner. This is the approach attempted by the authors in this paper. What has been done is to calculate the minimum sample specific activity that could be determined in a 30-min measurement time to a standard deviation of ± 10% for two widely used commercially available measuring systems: the Applied Physics Corporation Vibrating-Reed Electrometer and the Packard Tri-Carb Liquid Scintillation Spectrometer. Consideration is limited to the two most widely used beta-emitting tracer radioisotopes: tritium and C14.

Keywords

Liquid Scintillation Liquid Scintillator Beta Emitter Background Counting Rate Total Liquid Volume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Ionization-Chamber Method

  1. (1).
    Jesse and Sadauski. Phys. Rev. 107, 766 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Tolbert. Ionization Chamber Assay of Radioactive Gases, UCRL-3499 (March 5, 1956 ).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Tolbert. Tritium Measurements Using Ionization Chambers. This volume, p. 167Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Wagner and Guinn. Nucleonics 13, 10, 56 (1955).Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Wilzbach, Kaplan, and Brown. Science 118, 522 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Wilzbach, Van Dyken, and Kaplan. Anal. Chem. 26, 880 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liquid Scintillation Method

  1. (7).
    Agranoff. Nucleonics 15, 10, 106 (1957).Google Scholar
  2. (8).
    Bell and Hayes [ed.]. Liquid Scintillation Counting, Pergamon Press (1958).Google Scholar
  3. (9).
    Davidson and Feigelson. Intl. J. Appl. Rad. and Isotopes 2, 1 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (10).
    Furst and Kallmann. Phys. Rev. 97, 583 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (11).
    Kerr, Hayes, and Ott. Intl. J. Appl. Rad. and Isotopes 1, 284 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (12).
    Kinard. Rev. Sci. Instr. 28, 293 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (13).
    Okita, Kabara, Richardson, and Le Roy. Nucleonics 15, 6, 111 (1957).Google Scholar
  8. (14).
    Pringle, Black, Funt, and Sobering. Phys. Rev. 92, 1582 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (15).
    White and Helf. Nucleonics 14, 10, 46 (1956).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© New England Nuclear Corporation 1963

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. P. Guinn
    • 1
  • C. D. Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Shell Development CompanyEmeryvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations