Advertisement

Ecology of Riverine Fishes in Regulated Stream Systems with Emphasis on the Colorado River

  • Paul B. Holden

Abstract

Riverine fishes can be defined rather simply as species that inhabit rivers. This simplistic definition may suffice for general informational needs, but is insufficient when describing impacts. Some fishes that live in rivers require the river’s environment for sustenance of their populations, e.g., Pacific salmon (Oncorhynohus spp.), paddlefish (Polyodon spathula), and blue sucker (Cyoleptus elongatus). Other riverine species can do just as well, or better, in lakes, ponds, or other lentic environments, e.g., carp (Cyprinus carpio), fathead minnow (Pimephales prometas), and bass (Micropterus sp.). Therefore, changes in a natural river’s flow, temperature, water quality, or physical morphometry may affect certain species more than others; more likely it will affect those species that require lotic conditions to a greater extent than those which also tolerate lentic conditions.

Keywords

Native Fish Pacific Salmon Grand Canyon Instream Flow Steelhead Trout 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Allen, K. R., 1969, Distinctive aspects of the ecology of stream fishes: A review, J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 26:1429–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balon, E. K., 1978, Kariba: The dubious benefits of large dams, Ambio, 7(2):40–48.Google Scholar
  3. Banks, R. L., Mullan, J. W., Wiley, R. W., and Dufek, D. J., 1974, “The Fontenelle Green River Trout fisheries—Considerations in its Enhancement and Perpetuation, Including Test Flow Studies of 1973,” Fish Wildl. Serv., Salt Lake City, Utah.Google Scholar
  4. Blake, R. F., 1977, The effect of the impoundment of Lake Kainji, Nigeria, on the indigenous species of mormyrid fishes. Freshwater Biol., 7(l):37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bovee, K. D., 1978, “Probability-of-Use Criteria for the Family Salmonidae,” Fish Wildl. Serv., Coop. Inst. Flow Serv. Group, Info. Pap. 4.Google Scholar
  6. Bovee, K. D., and Cochnauer, T., 1977, “Development and Evaluation of Weighted Criteria, Probability-of-Use Curves for Instream Flow Assessments: Fisheries,” Fish Wildl. Serv., Coop. Inst. Flow Serv. Group, Info. Pap. 3.Google Scholar
  7. Branson, B. A., 1974, The American paddlefish: Signs of distress, Natl. Parks Conserv. Mag., 48(1):21–23.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, G. B., 1976, Effects of dams on Pacific salmon and steel-head trout, Mar. Fish. Rev., 38(11):39–46.Google Scholar
  9. Dominy, C. L., 1973, Recent changes in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) runs in the light of environmental changes in the Saint John River, New Brunswick, Canada, Biol. Conserv., 5(2):105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ebel, W. J., 1969, Supersaturation of nitrogen in the Columbia River and its effect on salmon and steelhead trout, Fish. Bull., 68(1):1–11.Google Scholar
  11. Edwards, R. J., 1978, The effect of hypolimnion reservoir releases on fish distribution and species diversity, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 107(1):71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ford, M. E., 1963, Air injection for control of reservoir limnology, J. Am. Water Works Assoc, 55:267–274.Google Scholar
  13. Fraser, J. C., 1972, Regulated discharge and the stream environment, p. 263–285, in: “River Ecology and Man,” R. T. Oglesby, C. A. Carlson, and J. A. McCann, eds., Acad. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Gottschalk, L. C., 1964, Reservoir sedimentation, p. 17–5 and 17–6, in: “Handbook of Applied Hydrology,” V. T. Chow, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Hamilton, M. P., and Carothers, S. W., Co-directors, 1978, “Fish, Wildlife and Habitat Assessment, San Juan River, New Mexico and Utah,” VTN Consolidated, Inc., and the Museum of Northern Arizona.Google Scholar
  16. Hatch, M. D., 1978, Fishes, p. E-l to E-58, in: “Handbook of Species Endangered in New Mexico,” New Mexico Dep. Game Fish, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
  17. Haynes, J. M., Gray, R. H., and Montgomery, J. C., 1978, Seasonal movements of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanas) in the mid-Columbia River, Trans. Am. Fish. Sog., 107(2): 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hazel, C. R., 1976, The reservation of instream flow for fish in California—a case study, in: “Proceedings, Instream Flow Needs, Vol. II,” J. F. Orsborn and C. H. Allman, eds., Am. Fish. Soc, Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  19. Holden, P. B., 1973, “Distribution, Abundance and Life History of the Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin,” Ph.D. Diss., Utah State Univ., Logan.Google Scholar
  20. Holden, P. B., 1977, “A Study of the Habitat Use and Movement of the Rare Fishes in the Green River from Jensen to Green River, Utah, August and September, 1977,” BIO/WEST, Logan, Utah, PR-13–1.Google Scholar
  21. Holden, P. R., and Crist, L. W., 1979, “Documentation of Changes in the Macroinvertebrate and Fish Populations in the Green River Due to Inlet Modification of Flaming Gorge Dam,” BIO/WEST, Logan, Utah, PR-16–2.Google Scholar
  22. Holden, P. B., and Irvine, J., 1975, “A Study of the Aquatic Fauna and Flora of Escalante Canyon, Utah,” Final Rep. to Natl, Park Service, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  23. Holden, P. B., and Stalnaker, C. B., 1975, Distribution and abundance of mainstream fishes of the middle and upper Colorado River Basins, 1967–1973, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 104(2):217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hubbs, C., 1972, Some thermal consequences of environmental manipulation of water, Biol. Conserv., 4(3): 185–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jordan, D. S., 1891, Report of explorations in Colorado and Utah during the summer of 1889, with an account of the fishes found in each of the river basins examined, U.S. Fish. Comm. Bull., 9:1–40.Google Scholar
  26. Joseph, T., Sinning, J., Behnke, R., and Holden, P., 1977, “An Evaluation of the Status, Life History, and Habitat Requirements of Endangered and Threatened Fishes of the Upper Colorado River System,” FWS/OBS Rep. No. 24.Google Scholar
  27. Kidd, G., 1977, “An Investigation of Endangered and Threatened Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River as Related to Bureau of Reclamation Projects,” Final Rep. to Bureau Reclam., Grand Junction, Colorado.Google Scholar
  28. Kimsey, J. B., 1957, Fisheries problems in impounded waters of California and the lower Colorado River, Ivans. Am. Fish. Soc., 87:39–57.Google Scholar
  29. Koryak, M., 1976, The influence of mainstem navigation dams on water quality and fisheries in the upper Ohio River Basin, p. 158–173, in: “Proceedings, Instream Flow Needs, Vol. II,” J. F. Orsborn and C. H. Allman, eds., Am. Fish. Soc, Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  30. Kroger, R. L., 1973, Biological effects of fluctuating water levels in the Snake River, Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, Am. Midi. Bat., 89(2):478–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis, D. S. C., 1974, The effects of the formation of Lake Kainji (Nigeria) upon the indigenous fish population, Eydrobiologia, 45(2–3):281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Long, C. S., and R. F. Krcma, 1969, Research on a system for bypassing juvenile salmon and trout around low-head dams, Comm. Fish. Rev., 31(6):27–29.Google Scholar
  33. McDonald, J. R., and Hyatt, R. A., 1973, Supersaturation of nitrogen in water during passage through hydroelectric turbines at Mactaguac Dam, J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 30:1392–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, R. R., 1946, Gilacypha, a remarkable new species of cyprinid fish from the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, Arizona, J. Wash. Acad. Soi., 36:409–415.Google Scholar
  35. Miller, R. R., 1961, Men and the changing fish fauna of the American Southwest, Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts, Lett., 46:365–404.Google Scholar
  36. Minckley, W. L., 1973, “Fishes of Arizona,” Ariz. Game Fish Dep., Phoenix.Google Scholar
  37. Minckley, W. L., and Deacon, J. E., 1968, Southwestern fishes and the enigma of “endangered species,” Science, 159:1424–1432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mullan, J. W., Starostka, V. J., Stone, J. L., Wiley, R. W., and Wiltzius, W. J., 1976, Factors affecting upper Colorado River reservoir tailwater trout fisheries, p. 405–428, in: “Proceedings, Instream Flow Needs, Vol. II,” J. F. Orsborn and C. H. Allman, eds., Am. Fish. Soc., Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  39. Nichols, P. R., 1968, “Passage Conditions and Counts of Fish at the Snake Island Fishway, Little Falls Dam, Potomac River, Maryland, 1960–63,” Fish. Wildl. Serv. Spec. Rep. 565.Google Scholar
  40. Nickelson, T., 1976, Development of methodologies for evaluating instream flow needs for salmonid rearing, p. 588–596, in: “Proceedings, Instream Flow Needs, Vol. II,” J. F. Orsborn and C. H. Allman, eds., Am. Fish. Soc., Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  41. Orsborn, J. F., and Allman, C. H., eds., 1976, “Proceedings, Instream Flow Needs, Vols. I and II,” Am. Fish. Soc., Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  42. Park, D. L., and Farr, W. E., 1972, Collection of juvenile salmon and steelhead trout passing through orifices in gatewalls of turbine intakes at Ice Harbor Dam, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 101(2):381–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Petr, T., 1978, Tropical man-made lakes—their ecological impacts, Arch. Hydrobiol., 8(3): 368–385.Google Scholar
  44. Pfitzer, D. W., 1963, “Investigations of Waters Below Large Storage Reservoirs in Tennessee,” Dingel-Johnson Rep., Proj. F-l-R, Tenn. Game Fish Comm.Google Scholar
  45. Pflieger, W. L., 1975, “The Fishes of Missouri,” Miss. Dep. Conserv., Jefferson City.Google Scholar
  46. Raymond, H. L., 1968, Migration rates of yearling chinook salmon in relation to flows and impoundments in the Columbia and Snake rivers, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 97 (4): 356–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raymond, H. L., 1969, Effect of John Day Reservoir on the migration rate of juvenile chinook salmon in the Columbia River, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 98(3):513–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raymond, H. L., 1976, Effect of dams and river regulation on runs of anadromous fish to the mid-Columbia and Snake rivers, p. 444–465, in: “Proceedings, Instream Flow Needs, Vol. II,” J. F. Orsborn and C. H. Allman, eds., Am. Fish. Soc., Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  49. Robinson, W. L., 1978, The Columbia: A river system under siege, Oreg. Wildl., 33(6):3–7.Google Scholar
  50. Seethaler, K., 1978, “Life History and Ecology of the Colorado Squawfish (Ftychocheilus lucius) in the Upper Colorado River Basin,” Unpubl. M.S. Thesis, Utah State Univ., Logan.Google Scholar
  51. Shikhshabekov, M. M., 1971, Resorption of the gonads in some semi-diadromous fishes of the Arakum Lakes (Dagestan ASSR) as a result of the regulation of discharge, J. Ichthyol., 11(3):427–431.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, F. E., 1976, Water development impact on fish resources and associated values of the Trinity River, California, p. 98–111, in: “Proceedings, Instream Flow Needs, Vol. II,” J. F. Orsborn and C. H. Allman, eds., Am. Fish. Soc., Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, P. W., 1979, “The Fishes of Illinois,” Univ. Illinois Press, Illinois St. Nat. Hist. Surv., Chicago.Google Scholar
  54. Spence, J. A., and Hynes, H. B. N., 1971, Differences in fish populations upstream and downstream of a mainstream impoundment, J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 28:45–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stalnaker, C. B., and Arnette, J. L., eds., 1976, “Methodologies for the Determination of Stream Resource Flow Requirements: An Assessment,” U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Off. Biol. Serv., West. Water Allocation.Google Scholar
  56. Taba, S. S., Murphy, J. R., and Frost, H. H., 1965, Notes on the fishes of the Colorado River near Moab, Utah, Proc. Utah Acad. Sci., Arts, Lett., 42(2):280–283.Google Scholar
  57. Trautman, M. B., and Gartman, D. K., 1974, Re-evaluation of the effects of man-made modifications on Gordon Creek between 1887 and 1973 and especially as regards its fish fauna, Ohio J. Sci., 74(3):162–173.Google Scholar
  58. Trefethen, P., 1972, Man’s impact on the Columbia River, p. 77–98, in: “River Ecology and Man,” R. T. Oglesby, C. A. Carlson, and J. A. McCann, eds., Acad. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  59. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 1976, “Negative Determination of Environmental Impact, Penstock Modification, Flaming Gorge Dam, Utah,” Salt Lake City, Utah.Google Scholar
  60. U.S. Department of the Interior, 1977, Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants, republication of list of species, Fed. Reg., 42(135):36420–36431.Google Scholar
  61. Vanicek, C. D., Kramer, R. H., and Franklin, D. R., 1970, Distribution of Green River fishes in Utah and Colorado following closure of Flaming Gorge Dam, Southwest. Nat., 14:297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. White, R. J., Hansen, E. A., and Alexander, G. A., 1976, Relationship of trout abundance to stream flow in midwestern streams, p. 597–615, in: “Proceedings, Instream Flow Needs, Vol. II,” J. F. Orsborn and C. H. Allman, eds., Am. Fish. Soc., Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
  63. Williams, J. D., and Finnley, D. K., 1977, Our vanishing fishes: Can they be saved, Acad. Nat. Sci., Philadelphia, Frontiers, Summer 1972.Google Scholar
  64. Zakharyan, G. B., 1972, The natural reproduction of sturgeons in the Kura River following its regulation, J. Ichthyol., 12(2):249–259.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul B. Holden
    • 1
  1. 1.BIO/WEST, Inc.LoganUSA

Personalised recommendations