Transcription Termination and Its Control

  • Jeffrey W. Roberts

Abstract

Transcription terminators form the natural boundaries of gene expression as well as act as sites of genetic regulation. E. coli and its phages have provided the central models to understand the biochemical mechanisms of these processes. The notable conservation of the two large major subunits of RNA polymerase between bacterial RNAP and all three eukaryotic enzymes,1 and the fact that termination is at least partly a function of these subunits,2 suggest that results from studies of E. coli should be of universal significance.

Keywords

Attenuation Bacillus Tryptophan Lactose Pyrimidine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sweetser D, Nonet M, Young RA. Prokaryotic and eukaryotic RNA polymerases have homologous core subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987; 84:1192–1196.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chan CL, Landick R. New perspectives on RNA chain elongation and termination by E. coli RNA polymerase. In: Conaway RC, Conaway JW, eds. Transcription: Mechanisms and Regulation. New York: Raven Press, 1994:297–321.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmidt MC, Chamberlin MJ. NusA protein of Escherichia coli is an efficient transcription termination factor for certain terminator sites. J Mol Biol 1987; 195:809–818.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yager T, von Hippel P. Transcript elongation and termination in Escherichia coli. In: Neidhardt F et al, eds. Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology, Washington, DC: Amer Soc Microbiol, 1987:1241–1275.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Platt T. Transcription termination and the regulation of gene expression. Ann Rev Biochem 1986; 55:339–372.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reynolds R, Chamberlin MJ. Parameters affecting transcription termination by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase I: Construction and analysis of hybrid terminators. J Mol Biol 1992; 224:53–63.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan CL, Landick R. Dissection of the his leader pause site by base substitution reveals a multipartite signal that includes a pause RNA hairpin. J Mol Biol 1993; 233:25–42.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ryan T, Chamberlin M. Transcription analysis with heteroduplex trp attenuator templates indicates that the transcript stem and loop structure serve as the termination signal. J Biol Chem 1983; 258:4690.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yanofsky C. Attenuation in the control of expression of bacterial operons. Nature 1981; 289:751–758.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng S-W et al. Functional importance of sequence in the stem-loop of a transcription terminator. Science 1992; 254:1205–1207.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arndt KM, Chamberlin MJ. RNA chain elongation by Escherichia-Coli RNA polymerase: factors affecting the stability of elongating ternary complexes. J Mol Biol 1990; 213:79–108.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lynn SP, Kasper LM, Gardner JF. Contributions of RNA secondary structure and length of the thymidine tract to transcription termination at the thr operon attenuator. J Biol Chem 1988; 263:472–479.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bertrand K et al. The attenuator of the tryptophan operon of Escherichia coli: heterogeneous 3′-OH termini in vivo and deletion mapping of functions. J Mol Biol 1977; 227–247.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farnham PJ, Platt T. A model for transcription termination suggested by studies on the trp attenuator in vitro using base analogs. Cell 1980; 20:739–748.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martin FH, Tinoco I Jr. DNA-RNA hybrid duplexes containing oligo(dA:rU) sequences are exceptionally unstable and may facilitate termination of transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 1980; 8:2295–2299.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson, von Hippel PH. Stability of Escherichia coli transcription complexes near an intrinsic terminator. J Mol Biol 1994; 244:36–51.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yager TD, von Hippel PH. A thermodynamic analysis of RNA transcript elongation and termination in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 1991; 30:1097–1118.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chamberlin M. New models for the mechanism of transcription elongation and its regulation. In: Harvey Lectures. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1994:1–21.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reynolds R, Bermudez-Cruz RM, Chamberlin MJ. Parameters affecting transcription termination by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase I. Analysis of 13 Rho-independent terminators. J Mol Biol 1992; 224:31–51.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Surratt CK, Milan SC, Chamberlin MJ. Spontaneous cleavage of RNA in ternary complexes of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and its signifiance for the mechanism of transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:7983–7987.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Borukhov S, Sagitov V, Goldfarb A. Transcript cleavage factors from E. coli. Cell 1993; 72:459–466.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krummel B, Chamberlin M. Structural analysis of ternary complexes of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: Deoxyribonuclease I footprinting of defined complexes. J Mol Biol 1992; 225:239–250.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krummel B, Chamberlin M. Structural analysis of ternary complexes of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: Individual complexes halted along different transcription units have distinct and unexpected biochemical properties. J Mol Biol 1992; 225:221–237.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nudler E, Goldfarb A, Kashlev M. Discontinuous mechanism of transcription elongation. Science 1994; 265:793–796.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nudler E et al. Coupling between transcription termination and RNA polymerase inchworming. Cell 1995; 81:351–357.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang D et al. Discontinuous movements of DNA and RNA in RNA polymerase accompany formation of a paused transcription complex. Cell 1995; 81:341–350.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Feng G et al. GreA-induced transcript cleavage in transcription complexes containing Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is controlled by multiple factors, including nascent transcript location and structure. J of Biol Chem 1994; 269:22282–22294.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu B et al. The DNA replication fork can pass RNA polymerase without displacing the nascent transcript. Nature (London) 1993; 366:33–39.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu B, Alberts BM. Head-on collision between a DNA replication apparatus and RNA polymerase transcription complex. Science (Washington DC) 1995; 267:1131–1137.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee DN, Landick R. Structure of RNA and DNA chains in paused transcription complexes containing Escherichia-coli RNA polymerase. J Mol Biol 1992; 228:759–777.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kainz M, Roberts JW. Structure of transcription elongation complexes in vivo. Science 1992; 255:838–841.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wagner LA et al. Transcriptional slippage occurs during elongation at runs of adenine or thymine in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 1990; 18:3529–3536.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    MacDonald LE et al. Characterization of two types of termination signal for bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. J Mol Bio 1994; 238:145–158.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bogenhagen D, Brown DB. Nucleotide sequences in Xenopus 5S DNA required for transcription termination. Cell 1981; 24:261.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lang WH et al. A model for transcription termination by RNA polymerase I. Cell 1994; 79:527–534.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wu SY, Platt T. Transcriptional arrest of yeast RNA polymerase II by Escherichia coli Rho protein in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:6606–6610.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wiest K, Hawley DK. In vitro analysis of a transcription termination site for RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 1990; 10:5782–5795.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reines D et al. Identification of intrinsic termination sites in-vitro for RNA polymerase II within eukaryotic gene sequences. J Mol Biol 1987; 196:299–312.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maizels N. The nucleotide sequence of the lactose messenger ribonucleic acid transcribed from the UV5 promoter mutant of E. coli. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1973; 70:3585–3589.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Farnham PJ, Platt T. Rho-independent termination: dyad symmetry in DNA causes RNA polymerase to pause during transcription in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 1981; 9:563–577.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ring BZ, Roberts JW. Function of a nontranscribed DNA strand site in transcription elongation. Cell 1994; 78:317–324.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Levin JR, Chamberlin MJ. Mapping and characterization of transcriptional pause sites in the early genetic region of bacteriophage T7. J Mol Biol 1987; 196:61–84.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lee DN et al. Transcription pausing by Escherichia-coli RNA polymerase is modulated by downstream DNA sequences. J Biol Chem 1990; 265:15145–15153.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    . Landick R, Yanofsky C. Transcription attenuation. In: Neidhardt F et al, eds. Escherichia coli and salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology. Washington, DC: Amer Soc Microbiol, 1987:1276–1301.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rosenberg M et al. The relationship between function and DNA sequences in an intercistronic regulatory region of phage lambda. Nature 1978; 272:414–423.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yang X, Roberts JW. Gene Q Antiterminator proteins of Escherichia-coli phages 82 and lambda suppress pausing by RNA polymerase at a Rho-dependent terminator and at other sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86:5301–5305.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mason SW, Li J, Greenblatt J. Host factor requirements for processive antitermination of transcription and suppression of pausing by the N protein of bacteriophage lambda. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:19418–19426.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fisher R, Yanofsky C. Mutations of the beta subunit of RNA polymerase alter both transcription pausing and transcription termination in the trp operon leader region in vitro. J Biol Chem 1983; 258:8146–8150.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    McDowell JC et al. Determination of intrinsic transcription termination efficiency by RNA polymerase elongation rate. Science (Washington DC) 1994; 266:822–825.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jin DJ et al. Termination efficiency at Rho-dependent terminators depends on kinetic coupling between RNA polymerase and Rho. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:1453–1457.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Goliger JA et al. Early transcribed sequences affect termination efficiency of Escherichia-coli RNA polymerase. J Mol Biol 1989; 205:331–342.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Telesnitsky APW, Chamberlin MJ. Sequences linked to prokaryotic promoters can affect the efficiency of downstream termination sites. J Mol Biol 1989; 205:315–330.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Piatt T, Richardson JP. Escherichia coli rho factor: Protein and enzyme of transcription termination. In: McKnight SL, Yamamoto KR, eds. Transcriptional Regulation, Book 1. 1992:365–388.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Roberts JW. Termination factor for RNA synthesis. Nature 1969; 224:1168–1174.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    de Crombrugghe G et al. Effect of rho on transcription of bacterial operons. Nature New Biology 1973; 241:260.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Richardson JP, Grimley C, Lowery C. Transcription termination factor rho activity is altered in Escherichia coli with suA gene mutations. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1975; 72:1725-.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Platt T. Rho and RNA: Models for recognition and response. Molecular Microbiology 1994; 11:983–990.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Galloway JL, Platt T. Signals sufficient for rho-dependent transcription termination at Trp T′ span a region centered 60 base pairs upstream of the earliest 3′ end point. J Biol Chem 1988; 263:1761–1767.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kupper H et al. A rho-dependent termination site in the gene coding for tyrosine tRNA su3 of Escherichia coli. Nature 1978; 272:423–428.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Stewart V, Landick R, Yanofsky C. Rho-dependent transcription termination in the tryptophanase Operon leader region of Escherichia-coli K-12. J Bacteriol 1986; 166:217–223.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Platt T. Termination of transcription and its regulation in the tryptophan operon of E. coli. Cell 1981; 24:10–23.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Albrechtsen B et al. Transcriptional termination sequence at the end of the Escherichia-coli ribosomal rrnG operon complex terminators and antitermination. Nucleic Acids Res 1991; 19:1845–1852.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Richardson JP. Preventing the synthesis of unused transcripts by rho factor. Cell 1991; 64:1047–1050.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    . Lowery-Goldhammer C, Richardson JP. An RNA-dependent nucleoside triphosphate phosphohydrolase (ATPase) activity associated with rho termination factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1974; 71:2003–2007.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zalatan F, Platt T. Effects of decreased cytosine content on rho interaction with the rho-dependent terminator trp t’ in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:19082–19088.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hart CDM, Roberts JW. Rho-dependent transcription termination characterization of the requirement for cytidine in the nascent transcript. J Biol Chem 1991; 266:24140–24148.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Chen CYA, Richardson JP. Sequence elements essential for rho-dependent transcription termination at lambda tR1. J Biol Chem 1987; 262: 11292–11299.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lau LF, Roberts J. p-Dependent transcription termination at lambda tRl requires upstream sequences. J Biol Chem 1985; 260:574–584.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zalatan F, Galloway Salvo- J, Platt T. Deletion analysis of the Escherichia coli rho dependent transcription terminator trp t′. J Biol Chem 1993; 268:17051–17056.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Morgan WD et al. RNA sequence and secondary structure requirements for rho-dependent trancription termination. Nucleic Acids Research 1985; 13:3739–3754.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Alifano P et al. A consensus motif common to all rho-dependent prokaryotic transcription terminators. Cell 1991; 64:553–563.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Hart CM, Roberts JW. Deletion analysis of the lambda tRl termination region. Effect of sequences near the transcript release sites, and the minimum length of rho-dependent transcripts. J of Mol Biol 1994; 237:255–265.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Lau LF, JW Roberts, Wu R. RNA polymerase pausing and transcript release at the lambda tRl terminator in vitro. J Biol Chem 1983; 258:9391–9397.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Pavco PA, Steege DA. Elongation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is blocked in vitro by a site-specific DNA binding protein. J Biol Chem 1990; 265:9960–9969.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Dolan JW, Marshall NF, Richardson JP. Transcription termination factor rho has three distinct structural domains. J Biol Chem 1990; 265: 5747–5754.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Dombroski AJ, Platt T. Structure of rho factor an RNA-binding domain and a separate region with strong similarity to proven ATP-binding domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85:2538–2542.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Richardson JP. Activation of rho protein ATPase requires simultaneous interaction at two kinds of nucleic acid-binding sites. J Biol Chem 1982; 257:5760–5766.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Seifried SE, Easton JB, Hippel von PH. ATPase activity of transcription termination factor rho: Functional dimer model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:10454–10458.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Morgan WD, Bear DG, von Hippel PH. Rho-dependent termination of transcription. I. Identification and characterization of termination sites for transcription from the bacteriophage Lambda pR promoter. J Biol Chem 1983; 258:9553–9564.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    McSwiggen JA, Bear DG, von Hippel PH. Interactions of Escherichia-coli transcription termination factor rho with RNA I. Binding stoichiometries and free energies. J Mol Biol 1988; 199:609–622.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Geiselmann J et al. A physical model for the translocation and helicase activities of Escherichia-coli transcription termination protein rho. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:7754–7758.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Brennan CA, Dombroski AJ, Platt T. Transcription termination factor rho is an RNA-DNA helicase. Cell 1987; 48:945–952.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Steinmetz EJ, Platt T. Evidence supporting a tethered tracking model for helicase activity of Escherichia coli Rho factor. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:1401–1405.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Zheng C, Friedman DI. Reduced Rho-dependent transcription termination permits NusA-independent growth of Escherichia coli. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:7543–7547.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Sullivan SL, Gottesman ME. Requirement for Escherichia coli NusG protein in factor-dependent transcription termination. Cell 1992; 68:989–994.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Nehrke KW, Platt T. A quaternary transcription termination complex: Reciprocal stabilization by Rho factor and NusG protein. J Mol Biol 1994; 243:830–839.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Greenblatt J, Nodwell JR, Mason SW. Transcriptional antitermination. Nature (London) 1993; 364:401–406.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Das A. How the phage lambda N gene product suppresses transcription termination: Communication of RNA polymerase with regulatory proteins mediated by signals in nascent RNA. J Bact 1992; 174:6711–6716.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Adhya S, Gottesman M, Crombrugghe B. Release of polarity in Escherichia coli by gene N of phage λ: Termination and antitermination of transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1974; 71:2534–2538.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Franklin NC. Altered reading of genetic signals fused to the N Operon of bacteriophage λ: Genetic evidence for the modification of polymerase by the protein product of the N gene. J Mol Biol 1974; 89:33–48.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Roberts JW. Antitermination and the control of transcription elongation. In: McKnight SL, Yamamoto KR, eds. Transcriptional regulation, Book I. 1992:389–406.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Berg KL, Squires C, Squires CL. Ribosomal RNA operon anti-termination function of leader and spacer region box B-box A sequences and their conservation in diverse microorganisms. J Mol Biol 1989; 209:345–358.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Landick R, Turnbough CL Jr. Transcriptional attenuation. In: McKnight SL, Yamamoto KR, eds. Transcriptional regulation. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Press, 1992:407–446.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Turnbough CL Jr, Hicks KL, Donahue JP. Attenuation control of pyrBI operon expression in Escherichia coli K12. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1983; 80:368–372.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Antson AA et al. The structure of trp RNA-binding attenuation protein. Nature (London) 1995; 374:693–700.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Stewart V, Yanofsky C. Evidence for transcription antitermination control of tryptophanase operon expression in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacterid 1985; 164:731–740.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Choder-Amster O, Wright A. Transcriptional regulation of the bgl operon of Escherichia-coli involves phosphotransferase system-mediated phosphorylation of a transcriptional antiterminator. J Cell Biochem 1993; 51:83–90.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Grundy FJ, Henkin TM. tRNA as a positive regulator of transcription antitermination in bacillus subtilis. Cell 1993; 74:475–482.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Friedman DO, Wilgus GS, Mural RJ. Gene N regulator function of phage λimm21: evidence that a site of action of N differs from a site of recognition. J Mol Biol 1973; 81:505–516.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Somasekhar G, Szybalski W. The functional boundaries of the Q utilization site required for antitermination of late transcription in bacteriophage lambda. Virology 1987; 158:414–426.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Yang X et al. Transcription antitermination by phage lambda gene Q protein requires a DNA segment spanning the RNA start site. Genes Dev 1987; 1:217–226.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Yarnell WS, Roberts JW. The phage lambda gene Q transcription antiterminator binds DNA in the late gene promoter as it modifies RNA polymerase. Cell 1992; 69:1181–1189.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Lazinski D, Grzadzielska E, Das A. Sequence-specific recognition of RNA hairpins by bacteriophage antiterminators requires a conserved argininerich motif. Cell 1989; 59:207–218.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Nodwell JR, Greenblatt J. The nut site of bacteriophage lambda is made of RNA and is bound by transcription antitermination factors on the surface of RNA polymerase. Genes Dev 1991; 5:2141.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Grayhack EJ, Roberts JW. The phage λ gene Q product: activity of a transcription antiterminator in vitro. Cell 1982; 30:637–648.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Grayhack EJ et al. Phage lambda gene Q antiterminator recognizes RNA polymerase near the promoter and accelerates it through a pause site. Cell 1985; 42:259–270.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Ring BZ, Roberts JW. Unpublished experiments. 1995.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Guo H-C. Mutational analysis of transcription antitermination mediated by lambdoid phage gene Q products. Ph.D. thesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 1990.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Yang X. Transcription antitermination mediated by lambdoid phage Q proteins. Ph.D. thesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 1988.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Yarnell W, Roberts JW. Unpublished experiments. 1995.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Roberts CW, Roberts JW. Unpublished experiments. 1995.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    McDowell JC. Relation of transcription termination and antitermination to the kinetics of transcription elongation. Ph.D. thesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 1994.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Friedman DI. A bacterial mutant affecting lambda development. In: Hershey AD, ed. The Bacteriophage Lambda. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1971:733.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Georgopoulos CP. A bacterial mutation affecting N function. In: Hershey AD, ed. The Bacteriophage Lambda. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1971.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Friedman DI, Gottesman ME. Lytic mode of lambda development. In: Hendrix et al, eds. Lambda II. 1983.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Li J et al. Nusg a new Escherichia-coli elongation factor involved in transcriptional antitermination by the N protein of phage lambda. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:6012–6019.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Sullivan SL, Ward DF, Gottesman ME. Effect of Escherichia coli NusG function on lambda N-mediated transcription antitermination. J Bacteriol 1992; 174:1339–1344.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Salstrom JS, Szybalski W. Coliphage λnutL-: a unique class of mutants defective in the site of gene N product utilization for antitermination of leftward transcription. J Mol Biol 1978; 134:195–221.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Greenblatt J, Li J. Interaction of the sigma factor and the nusA gene protein of E. coli with RNA polymerase in the initiation-termination cycle of transcription. Cell 1981; 24:421–428.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Greenblatt J, Li J. The nusA gene product of Escherichia coli: Its identification and a demonstration that it interacts with the gene N transcription antitermination protein of bacteriophage lambda. J Mol Biol 1981; 147:11–23.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Chattopadhyay S et al. Bipartite function of a small RNA hairpin in transcription antitermination in bacteriophage lambda. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:4061–4065.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Nodwell JR, Greenblatt J. Recognition of boxA antiterminator RNA by the Escherichia coli antitermination factors NusB and ribosomal protein S10. Cell 1993; 72:261–268.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Doelling JH, Franklin NC. Effects of all single base substitutions in the loop of boxB on antitermination of transcription by bacteriophage lambda’s N protein. Nucleic Acids Res 1989; 17:5565–5578.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Mogridge J, Mah T-F, Greenblatt J. A protein-RNa interaction network facilitates the template-independent cooperative assembly on RNA polymerase of a stable antitermination complex containing the N protein of phage λ. Genes and Development 1995; (in press).Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Whalen W, Ghosh B, Das A. NusA protein is necessary and sufficient in vitro for phage lambda N gene product to suppress a rho-independent terminator placed downstream of nutL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85:2494–2498.Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Devito J, Das A. Control of transcription processivity in phage lambda: Nus factors strengthen the termination-resistant state of RNA polymerase induced by N antiterminator. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 8660–8664.Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Morgan EA. Insertions of Tn10 into an E. coli ribosomal RNA Operon are incompletely polar. Cell 1980; 21:257–265.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Berg KL, Squires C, Squires CL. Ribosomal RNA Operon anti-termination function of leader and spacer region boxB-boxA sequences and their conservation in diverse microorganisms. J Mol Biol 1989; 209:345–358.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Squires CL et al. Ribosomal RNA antitermination in vitro: Requirement for Nus factors and one or more unidentified cellular components. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:970–974.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Robert J et al. The remarkable specificity of a new transcription termination factor suggests that the mechanisms of termination and antitermination are similar. Cell 1987; 51:483–492.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Hung SC, Gottesman ME. Phage HK022 nun protein arrests transcription on phage lambda DNA in vitro and competes with the phage lambda N antitermination protein. J Mol Biol 1995; 247:428–442.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Oberto J et al. Antitermination of early transcription in phage HK022: Absence of a phage-encoded antitermination factor. J Mol Biol 1993; 229:368–381.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Clerget M, Jin DJ, Weisberg RA. A zinc-binding region in the β′ subunit of RNA polymerase is involved in antitermination of early transcription of phage HK022. J Mol Biol 1995; 248:768–780.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© R.G. Landes Company 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey W. Roberts

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations