Bifurcation in Heterogeneous Combustion

  • L. De Luca
  • G. Riva
  • C. Bruno
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 116)


Heterogeneous combustion takes place at the interface separating two different physical phases. The burning of solid propellants for rocket propulsion represents typically this type of combustion. So-called composite solid propellants are mixtures of finely ground salts, such as NH4ClO4 (ammonium Perchlorate = AP), and a polymer binder (for instance polybutadiene) in a ratio of order 4:1. At operational pressures combustion of AP-based solid propellants takes place in a thin zone close to the interface solid/gas. On the solid surface itself the polymer pyrolyzes forming gaseous products, and the AP decomposes into NH3 and HClO4 that react exothermically between themselves and with the polymer vapor in a diffusion flame. Details of the physics and chemistry of this type of combustion may be found elsewhere1-2. The purpose of this study is to present a mathematical model of the solid phase-gas system reacting at the interface, and to show that depending on the external variables (pressure, heat flux by radiation) and on the physico-chemical characteristics of the propellant (energy content, activation energies of the condensed phase decomposition reaction, etc.) burning occurs in different regimes.


Burning Rate Bifurcation Diagram Condensed Phase Bifurcation Parameter Solid Propellant 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Steinz, J.A., Stang, P.L., and Summerfield, M., 1969, The Burning Mechanism of Ammonium Perchlorate Based Composite Propellants, Princeton University AMS Report No, 830, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Merkle, C.L., Turk, S.L., and Summerfield, M., 1969, Extinguishment of Solid Propellant by Depressurization: Effects of Propellant Parameters, AIAA Paper No. 69–176.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruno, C., Riva, G., Zanotti, C., Donde, R., Grimaldi, C., and De Luca, L., 1983, Experimental and Theoretical Burning of Solid Rocket Propellants Near the Pressure Deflagration Limit, International Astronautical Federation Paper IAF-83–367.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Luca, L., Riva, G., and Zanotti, C., 1983, Nonlinear Burning Stability of Solid Propellants, U.S. Army European Research Office, Final Technical Report, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haken, H., 1978, “Synergetics”, Springer-Verlag, N.Y., p. 195.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krier, H., T’ien, J.S., Sirignano, W.A., and Summerfield, M., 1968, Nonsteady Burning Phenomena of Solid Propellants: Theory and Experiments, AIAA J., Vol. 6, No. 2, p. 278.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kooker, D.E., and Zinn, B.T., 1974, Numerical Investigation of Nonlinear Axial Instabilities in Solid Rocket Motors, B.R.L. Contract Report No. 141.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levine, J.N., and Culick, F.E.C., 1974, “Nonlinear Analysis of Solid Rocket Combustion Instability”, Air Force Report AFRPL TR-74–75.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goodman, T.R., 1964, Application of Integral Methods to Transient Nonlinear Heat Transfer, in “Advances in Heat Transfer”, Vol. 1, Academic Press, N.Y., p. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Luca, L., Riva, G., and Tanturli, I,, 1982, Numerical Solution of Solid Propellant Burning, L’Aerotecnica Missili e Spazio, Vol. 61, No, 2, pp. 61–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. De Luca
    • 1
  • G. Riva
    • 1
  • C. Bruno
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Energetica-CNPMPolitecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations