Advertisement

The Impact of Sociopolitical Systems on Teenage Alcohol Abuse

  • Richard E. Horman

Abstract

If one assumes the “disease model” for alcoholism, there is no reason to discuss the impact of sociopolitical systems on teenage alcoholism. The disease model would define the etiology of the problem as being biologically based. As a result, sociological and political phenomena would not have any significant impact on the problem. For the purpose of this discussion, however, I submit that the disease model is invalid and that the problem of alcoholism can be defined only as a highly complex political and behavioral problem. I believe further that alcoholism is in and of itself symptomatic of deep and significant societal and psychological problems. Unfortunately, we have come to label alcoholism as a disease when it is merely a symptom of underlying diseases. Because we have decided to classify alcoholism as a disease, we have decided that the appropriate treatment objective for this disease is abstinence. It is unfortunate that we have given this complicated problem an easy label and an easy cure.

Keywords

State Store Alcoholic Beverage Capita Consumption American Sociological Review Young Driver 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dean, D. Alienation: Its meaning and measurement. American Sociological Review, 1961, 26, 753–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Durkheim, E. On anomie. In C. W. Mills (Ed.), Images of man. New York: Braziller, 1960.Google Scholar
  3. Gould, L. Conformity and marginality: Two faces of alienation. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25, 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hajda, J. Alienation and integration of student intellectuals. American Sociological Review, 1961, 26, 758–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horman, R. Alienation and student drug use. International Journal of the Addictions, 1973, 8, 325–331.Google Scholar
  6. Keniston, K. The uncommitted. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1960.Google Scholar
  7. Keniston, K. Drug use and student values. Paper presented at the National Association of Student Personnel Administrators Drug Education Conference, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1966. (a)Google Scholar
  8. Keniston, K. The psychology of the alienated student. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, New York, Sept. 1966.(b)Google Scholar
  9. Marx, K. Capital, the communist manifesto and other writings. Max Eastman (Ed.), New York: Modern Library, 1932.Google Scholar
  10. Marx, K. On alienation. In C. W. Mills (Ed.), Images of man. New York: Braziller, 1960.Google Scholar
  11. Matlins, S. An examination of proposed changes in minimum age ABC laws in Massachuetts and Minnesota, Washington, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. Mc Gee, R. Social disorganization in America. San Francisco: Chandler, 1962.Google Scholar
  13. Merton, R. Anomie, anomia, and social interaction. In M. B. Clinard (Ed.), Anomie and deviant behavior. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  14. Nettler, G. A measure of alienation. American Sociological Review, 1957, 22, 670–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt, W., & Kornaczewski, A. A further note on the effect of lowering the drinking age on alcohol related motor vehicle accidents (Substudy #558). Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1973.Google Scholar
  16. Seeman, M. On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 1959, 24, 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Struening, E., & Richardson, A. A factor analytic exploration of alienation, anomia, and authoritarianism domain. American Sociological Review, 1965, 30, 768–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Taviss, I. Changes in the form of alienation: The 1900’s vs. the 1950’s. American Sociological Review, 1969, 34, 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard E. Horman
    • 1
  1. 1.National Psychiatric InstitutesUSA

Personalised recommendations