Advertisement

Spatial Distribution of the Index of Refraction of Suspended Matter in the Ocean

  • J. Ronald V. Zaneveld
Part of the Marine Science book series (MR, volume 4)

Abstract

The use of the index of refraction of suspended particles as a tracer of water masses and for the analysis of the composition of particulate matter is discussed. A method for determining the index of refraction of suspended particles is presented. In order to determine an index of refraction for a s ample, the ratio of light scattered at 45° for two wavelengths and the particle-size distribution must be known. By using a ratio, the difficult problem of determining absolute scattering values is avoided. In order to evaluate the index of refraction as an oceanic parameter, two widely different oceanic areas — the Oregon coastal area and the Equatorial Facific near the Galapagos Islands — are examined. The spatial distribution of the index of refraction in these areas is studied in relation to ocean dynamics and to the nature of the suspended material. The limitations and advantages of using the index of refraction of suspended particles as an oceanic parameter are presented.

Keywords

Suspended Particulate Matter Refraction Index Particle Sample Galapagos Island Inherent Optical Property 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, O. B. and H. R. Gordon, Comment on “method for the determination of the index of refraction of particles suspended in the ocean,” in preparation, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Gordon, H. R., H. Bader, and O. B. Brown, An experimental and theoretical study of suspended particulate matter in the Tongue of the Ocean and its influence on underwater visibilities, Final Report, Contract No. F08606-7-C-0028 Air Force Eastern Test Range Measurements Laboratory, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Jerlov, N. G., Particle distribution in the ocean, Rep. Swed. Deep-Sea Exped., 1947–1948, vol. 3, pp. 73–97, 1953.Google Scholar
  4. Kullenberg, G., A comparison between observed and computed light scattering functions, Inst. Fys. Oc U. of Copenhagen, Rep. 13, 12+9 pp., 1970.Google Scholar
  5. Mie, G., Beitrage zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidalen Metallösungen, Ann. Physik., 25, 377, 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Morel, A., Diffusion de la lumière par les eaux de mer, Resultats experimentaux et approche théorique, in Optics of the Sea [Interface and In-water Transmission and Imaging) AGARD-LS-61, AGARD-NATO, pp. 3.1–1–3.1–76, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. Pak, H. and J. R. V. Zaneveld, The Cromwell current on the East side of the Galapagos Islands, in preparation, 1973.Google Scholar
  8. Sasaki, T., N. Okami, G. Oshiba, and S. Watanabe, Angular distribution of scattered light in deep sea water, Records of Oceanographic Works in Japan, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 1960.Google Scholar
  9. Van de Hulst, H. C., Light Scattering by Small Particles, pp. 172–199, Wiley, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
  10. Zaneveld, J. R. V., and H. Pak, Method for determination of the index of refraction of particles suspended in the ocean, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 63, 321–324, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Ronald V. Zaneveld
    • 1
  1. 1.Oregon State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations