CAD and the human operator

  • E. C. Kingsley


Equipment designers are increasingly turning to CAD tools to speed up their design processes. However, there is often a tendency under traditional design methods to leave consideration of the human operator to the end of the design process. It is likely, therefore, that the introduction of rapid CAD methods will increase rather than decrease this tendency.

To counteract this tendency the CAD industry needs first to provide designers with CAD tools that can take account of human operator’s requirements; and second, to apply human factors in the design of its own CAD work stations. By promoting human factors within the CAD industry in this manner it is quite feasible to expect the work places and products of the future to be more rather than less ‘humanized’.


Human Factor Work Place Traditional Design Method Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory Human Factor Specialist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alder, D G, Daniel, R W and Kanarick, A F (1972) Keyboard design and operation — a review of the major issues. Human Factors 14: 275–93Google Scholar
  2. Badler, N I and Smoliar, S W (March 1979) Digital representation of human movement. Computing Surveys 2: 1Google Scholar
  3. Bapu, P, Evans, S, Kikta, P and Korna, M (1980) COMBIMAN. University of Dayton Research Institute and J McDaniel Air Force Aerospace Medical Research LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruton, D M (1972) Medical aspects of cathode ray tube displays. Trans. Soc. Occ. Med. 22: 56–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Business Equipment Trade Association (1980) A guide to users of business equipment incorporating visual display units. BETA: LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cakir, A, Hart, D J and Stewart, T F M (1980) Visual display terminals. John Wiley. ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris, R M, Bennett, J and Dow, L A (June 1980) CAR-II-a revised model for crew assessment of reach. US Naval Air Development CentreGoogle Scholar
  8. Kingsley, E C (1982) SAMMIE — 3D modelling for human factors evaluations. Butterworth Scientific Inc. Proceedings CAD 82 (Brighton, UK: 30 March-1 April 1982)Google Scholar
  9. Ostberg, O (November 1975) CRT’s pose health problems for operators. International Journal of Occupational Health and Safety Google Scholar
  10. Ryan, P W (November 1971) Concept Geometry Evaluation. Boeing Co.Google Scholar
  11. Stewart, T F M, Ostberg, O and Mackay, C J (1974) Computer terminal ergonomics: a review of recent human factors literature. Statskontoret, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  12. Waterman, D and Washburn, C T (1978) CYBERMAN — a human factors design tool. Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper Series no 780283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The CADCAM Association 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. C. Kingsley
    • 1
  1. 1.Prime CADCAM LtdStevenage, HertsUK

Personalised recommendations