Advertisement

Hadronic Production of Heavy Flavours

  • L. Montanet

Abstract

Heavy quarks (i.e., charm c and beauty b) turn out to be very useful probes to study hadron dynamics. There are good reasons to hope that the QCD perturbative theory can be applied to understand the production of heavy quarks in hadronic collisions, assuming the gluon-gluon fusion process
$$gg \to Q\bar Q$$
(1)
or the quark-quark fusion process
$$q\bar q \to Q\bar Q$$
(2)
.

Keywords

Heavy Quark HADRONIC Production Charm Production Heavy Flavour Charm Baryon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Fritzch, Phys. Lett. 67B (1977) 217;Google Scholar
  2. F. Halzen, Phys. Lett. 69B (1977) 105;Google Scholar
  3. L. Jones and H. Wyld, Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 1782;Google Scholar
  4. M. Glück and E. Reya, Phys. Lett. 79R (1978) 453;Google Scholar
  5. J. Balcock, D. Sivers and S. Wolfram, Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 162;Google Scholar
  6. C. E. Carlsson and S. Suaya, Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 760Google Scholar
  7. C. E. Carlsson and S. Suaya, Phys. Lett. 81B (1979) 329.Google Scholar
  8. K. Hagiwara and T. Yoshino, Phys. Lett. 80B (1979) 282Google Scholar
  9. H. M. Georgi et al, Ann of Phys. 114 (1978) 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. B. L. Combridge, Nucl. Phys. B151 (1979) 429;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Winder and C. Michael, Nucl. Phys. B173 (1980) 59;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. A. B. Carter and C. H. Llewellyn-Smith, Nucl. Phys. B162 (1980) 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 2.
    B. L. Combridge, Nucl. Phys. 8151 (1979) 429;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. V. Barger, F. Halzen and W. Y. Keung, Phys. Rev. D24 (1981) 1328;Google Scholar
  15. V. Barger, F. Halzen and W. Y. Keung, Phys. Rev. D25 (1982) 112;Google Scholar
  16. R. Odorio-preprint IFUB 82/3 (1982);Google Scholar
  17. See also the contributions of F. Halzen and of R. Odorico to the Moriond Workshop on New Flavours, Les Arcs Savoie France, January 1982 (Ref. (9)).Google Scholar
  18. 3.
    L. Jones and H. Wyld, Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 2332;Google Scholar
  19. M. Glick, J. F. Owens and E. Reya, Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 2324;Google Scholar
  20. J. H. Kuhn, Phys. Lett. 89B (1980) 385;Google Scholar
  21. V. Barger, W. Y. Keung and R. Phillips, Phys. Lett. 91B (. 1980 ) 253.Google Scholar
  22. 4.
    A. B. Carter and C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Nucl. Phys. B162 (1980) 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 5.
    P. Mazzanti and S. Wada, Preprint IFUB 82 /9 (1982).Google Scholar
  24. 6.
    S. J. Brodsky et al., Phys. Lett. 93B (1980) 451;Google Scholar
  25. S. J. Brodsky, C. Peterson and N. Sakai, Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 2745;Google Scholar
  26. See also the contribution of R. J. N. Phillips to the Moriond Works on New Flavours, Les Arcs Savoie, France, January 1982 (Ref. 9).Google Scholar
  27. 7.
    G. Gustafson and C. Peterson, Phys. Lett. 67B (1977) 81.Google Scholar
  28. 8.
    B. Margolis, Contribution to the Moriond Workshop on New Flavours, Les Arcs Savoie, France, January 1982 and Y. Afek et al., Phys. Rev. D25 (1982) 1833.Google Scholar
  29. 9.
    The 1982 Moriond Workshop on New Flavours, Les Arcs Savoie France ( Editions Frontière ), Tran Thanh Van Editor.Google Scholar
  30. 10.
    S. Wojcicki, High Energy Physics, 1980 Madison, Wisconsin, USA (American Institute of Physics), p. 1430;Google Scholar
  31. D. Treille, International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies, Bonn, Germany, 1981;Google Scholar
  32. M. Derrick, Physics in Collision, 1981, Blacksburg, Virginia, W. P. Trower and G. Bellini, Editors (Plenum).Google Scholar
  33. 11.
    C. Conforto, see Ref. 9, p. 399.Google Scholar
  34. 12.
    S. Olsen, see Ref. 9, p. 367.Google Scholar
  35. 13.
    G. Coremans-Bertrand et al., Phys. Lett. 65B (1976) 480;Google Scholar
  36. W. Bozzoli et al., Nuovo Cimento Lett. 19 (1977) 32;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. T. Aziz et al., TIFR preprint TIFR-BC-82–1.Google Scholar
  38. 14.
    P. Weìlhammer, see Ref. 9, p. 323.Google Scholar
  39. 15.
    M. C. Touboul, see Ref. 9, p. 359.Google Scholar
  40. 16.
    R. Phillips, see Ref. 9, p. 467.Google Scholar
  41. 17.
    E. Hugentobler, see Ref. 9, p. 269.Google Scholar
  42. 18.
    D. Buchholz, see Ref. 9, p. 377.Google Scholar
  43. 19.
    S. Zaninotti, see Ref. 9, p. 347.Google Scholar
  44. 20.
    Bologna, Glasgow, Rutherford, Saclay, Torino collaboration reported by S. Wojcicki at the High Energy Physics Conference, 1980, Nadison(L. Durand and L. G. Pondrom, Editors).Google Scholar
  45. 21.
    S. U. Chung, see Ref. 9, p. 315.Google Scholar
  46. 22.
    D. DiBitonto, Review talk presented at the 2nd Topical Workshop on Forward Collider Physics (to be published, AIP).Google Scholar
  47. 23.
    K. Giboni et al., Phys. Lett. 85B (1979) 437.Google Scholar
  48. 24.
    L. Cifarelli, see Ref. 9, p. 429.Google Scholar
  49. 25.
    W. Geist, see Ref. 9, p. 407.Google Scholar
  50. 26.
    Table 1 is the result of a confrontation of the observations made by the experiments given in the first column as discussed at the Moriond Workshop on New Flavours (see Ref. 9, p. 605) with updated values for NA16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Montanet
    • 1
  1. 1.EP-DivisionCERNGenève 23Switzerland

Personalised recommendations