Advertisement

Measurement of Proton/M412 Ratios in Suspensions of Purple and White Membrane from Halobacterium Halobium

  • A. Edward Robinson
  • Eva Hrabeta
  • Lester Packer

Summary

We have studied isolated purple membrane from Halobacterium halobium strain S9 and white membrane from the mutant strain JW-5, making careful measurements of the proton to M412 stoichiometry of our preparations, and also examining them by Quasi Elastic Light Scattering (QELS) and by negative staining electron microscopy (EM), to assess extent of aggregation and hydrodynamic radius.

In the past decade there have been varying reports of the stoichiometry of proton release from purple membrane in suspension and protons pumped after its incorporation into phospholipid vesicles. Interpretation of the results, especially when by a group other than that which carried out the experiments, has sometimes been clouded by a misunderstanding of the differences between the various measurements involved and also by a lack of recognition that the aggregation state of membranes will affect the measured ratios.

In an attempt to resolve these misunderstandings, we have investigated the H+/M412 ratio, measured in suspensions of purple membranes by the laser flash induced response of pH indicator dyes. We have found this ratio to reflect the aggregation state of the membrane, assessed on the same preparations by QELS (and EM, see accompanying chapter: Lefort-Tran et al.). We have also found our measurements of proton release stoichiometry on retinal reconstituted white membrane suspensions to give much higher H+/M412 ratios than the same measurements on purple membrane suspensions.

Keywords

Trypsin Treatment Purple Membrane Proton Release Bulk Aqueous Phase Quasi Elastic Light Scattering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blaurock, A.E., Stoeckenius, W., Oesterhelt, D. and Scherphof, G.L. Structure of the cell envelope of Halobacterium halobium. J. Cell. Biol. 71, 1–22 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuschmitz, D. and Hess, B. On the ratio of the proton and photochemical cycles of bacteriorhodopsin. Biochemistry 20, 5950–5957, (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lozier, R.H., Niederberger, W., Bogomolni, R.N., Hwang, S. and Stoeckenius, W. Kinetics and stoichiometry of light-induced proton release and uptake from purple membrane fragments, Halobacterium halobium cell envelopes and phospholipid vesicles containing oriented purple membrane. Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 440, 545–556 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Govindjee, R., Ebrey, T.G. and Crofts, A.R. The quantum efficiency of proton pumping by the purple membrane of Halobacterium halobium. Biophys. J., 30, 231–242 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Govndjee, R., Ohno, K. and Ebrey, T.G. Effect of removal of the C-terminal region of bacteriorhodopsin on its light induced H+ changes. Biophys. J. 38, 85–87 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerber, G.E., Wildenauer, D. and Khorana, H.G. Orientation of bacteriorhodopsin in Halobacterium halobium as studied by selective proteolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5426–5430 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ovchinnkov, Y.A., Abdulaev, N.G., Feigina, M.Y., Kiselev, A.U. and Lobanov, N.A. Recent fndings in the structure-functional characteristcs of bacteriorhodopsin. FEBS Lett. 84, 1–4 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liao, M.-J. and Khorana, H.G. Removal of the carboxyl-terminal peptide does not affect refolding or function of bacteriorhodopsin as a light dependent proton pump J. Biol. Chem. 259, 4194–4199 (1984).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Govindjee, R., Ohno, K., Chang, C.-H. and Ebrey, T.G. In: Transduction in Biological Membranes, Plenum Press, In Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garty, H., Klemperer, G., Eisenbach, M. and Caplan, S.R. FEBS Lett. 81, 238–242 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oesterhelt, D. and Stoeckenius, W. Isolation of the cell membrane of Halobacterium halobium and its fractionation into red and purple membrane, In: Methods in Enzymology (S. Fleischer and L. Packer, eds.), vol. 31, pp. 667–678, New York, Academic Press, (1974).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oesterhelt, D. Reconstitution of the retinal proteins bacteriorhodopsin and halorhodopsin. In: Methods in Enzymology (L. Packer, ed.), vol. 88, pp. 10–17, New York, Academic Press, (1982).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mukohata, Y., Sugiyama, Y.,Kaji, Y., Usukura, J. and Yamada, E. The white membrane of crystalline bacterioopsin in Halobacterium halobium strain R1mW and its conversion nto purple membrane by exogenous retinal. Photochem. Photobiol. 33, 593–600, (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ware, B.R. and Haas, D.D. Electrophoretc light scattering. In: Fast Methods in Physical Biochemistry and Cell Biology (R.I. Sha’afi and S.M. Fernandez,eds.), pp. 174–220, Elsevier Science Publishers, (1983).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arrio, B., Johannin, G., Carrette, A., Chevallier, J. and Brethes, D. Electrokinetic and hydrodynamic properties of sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles: a study by laser Doppler electrophoresis and quasielasticlightscattering. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 228, 220–229, (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arrio, B., Johannin, G., Volfin, P. and Packer, L. Quas-elastic laser light scatterng and Doppler electrophoresis of purple membranes. Biophys. Soc. Abstr. 45, 212a, (1984).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arrio, B., Johannin, G., Volfin, P., Lefort-Tran, M., Packer, L., Robinson, A.E. and Hrabeta, E. Aggregation and proton release of purple and white membranes following cleavage of the C-terminal tail of bacteriorhodopsin. Submitted to Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics (1985).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wallace, B.A. and Henderson, R. Location of the carboxyl terminus of bacteriorhodopsin in purple membrane. Biophys. J. 39, 233–239, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Govindgee, R., Ohno, K. and Ebrey, T.G. Effect of the removal of the COOH-terminal region of bacteriorhodopsin on its light-induced H+ changes. Biophys. J. 38, 85–87, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walsh, K.A. Trypsinogens and trypsins of various species. Methods in Enzymology (Perlmann,G.E. and Lorand, L.,eds.) vol. 19, pp. 41–63 (1971).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Edward Robinson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eva Hrabeta
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lester Packer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physiology-AnatomyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Membrane Bioenergetics GroupLawrence Berkeley LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations