Advertisement

On the Coupling of the Earth’s Core and Mantle During the 26,000-Year Precession

  • Alar Toomre

Abstract

Recent papers by Malkus (1963) and by Stewartson and Roberts (1963) have raised anew the question of the identity of the coupling mechanism whereby the liquid core of the Earth is induced to partake in the luni-solar (or 26,000-year) precession of the mantle. That the angular momentum vector of the core indeed must precess with the same period and approximately with the same angular amplitude as the exterior can hardly be doubted. Bullard (1949), in particular, has pointed out that if that were not the case, the resulting magnetic effects would almost certainly be too violent to have gone unnoticed. It is readily estimated, however, that the direct lunar and solar gravitational torques on the core total only about three-quarters of the value needed to make it precess at such a rate, on account of the core being denser and therefore more nearly spherical than this planet as a whole. Hence the problem of accounting for the manner in which the remaining one-quarter or so of the required moment manages to be conveyed from the mantle to the fluid within.

Keywords

Lower Mantle Interaction Torque Angular Momentum Vector Core Fluid Gravitational Torque 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axford, W. I. (1960), J. Fluid Mech. 8: 97–102.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bondi, H., and Lyttleton, R. A. (1948), Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 44: 345–359.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bondi, H., and Lyttleton, R. A. (1953), Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 49: 498–515.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullard, E. C. (1949), Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) Ser. A 197: 433–453.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hopkins, W. (1840), Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London) 130, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Inglis, D. R. (1941), Phys. Rev. 59: 178–188.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jeffreys, H. (1959), The Earth, ed. 4, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  8. Kelvin, Lord (1876), Math. and Phys. Papers 3: 320–336.Google Scholar
  9. MacDonald, G. J. F., and Ness, N. F. (1961), J. Geophys. Res. 66: 1865–1911.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Malkus, W. V. R. (1963), J. Geophys. Res. 68: 2871–2886.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Miller, G. (1964), Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  12. Munk, W. H., and MacDonald, G. J. F. (1960), The Rotation of the Earth, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  13. Poincaré, H. (1910), Bull. Astron. 27: 321–356.Google Scholar
  14. Rochester, M. G. (1960), Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London) Ser. A 252: 531–555.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stewartson, K., and Roberts, P. H. (1963), J. Fluid Mech. 17: 1–20.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tozer, D. C. (1959), in: Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, vol. 3, Pergamon Press, London, pp. 414–436.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alar Toomre

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations