Skip to main content

Physical Mechanisms for Biological Effects of Ultrasound at Low-Intensity Levels

  • Chapter
Ultrasound Interactions in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

Much of the recent increased interest in bioeffects of ultrasound stems from the astounding success of ultrasound in diagnostic medicine. Because it is so widely used in examining pregnancies, it is now to be expected that much of the future population of the world will have been exposed to ultrasound before birth. As the societal impact of any environmental agent increases, so does public concern about its safety. Hence it is not surprising that questions are being raised from various quarters about possible risks from medical ultrasound, even though its safety record is excellent. It is necessary to respond to these questions now, and continuously, although most of us would very likely prefer to have more knowledge before passing judgements. In order to respond, a number of individuals and groups have turned to the scientific literature for help and have sought to form conclusions based on the published data. In Fig. 1. is a generalization arrived at by the Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM). It was approved by the AIUM in 1976 and again, slightly revised, in 1978.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AIUM Bioeffects Committee, brochure entitled “Who’s Afraid of of a Hundred Milliwatts per Square Centimeter?” available from American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 4405 East-West Highway, Suite 504, Washington, D.C. 20014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.N. Harvery, E.B. Harvery and A.L. Loomis, Further observations on the effect of high frequency sound waves on living matter, Biol. Bull. 55: 459 (1928).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Gershoy, D.L. Miller and W.L. Nyborg, Intercellular gas: its role in sonated plant tissue, in “Ultrasound in Medicine, Volume 2”, D.White and R. Barnes, eds., Plenum Press, New York (1976), pp. 501–511.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. D.L. Miller, A cylindrical-bubble model for the response of plant-tissue gas bodies to ultrasound, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65: 1313–1321 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D.L. Miller, Cell death thresholds in Elodea for 0.45–10 MHz ultrasound compared to gas-body resonance theory, Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. 4: 351–357 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D.J. Martin, H.G. Gemwell and D.J. Watmough, A study of streaming in plant tissue induced by a doppler fetal heart detector, Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. 4: 131–138 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M.W. Miller and G.E. Kaufman, Effects of short-duration exposures to 2 MHz ultrasound on growth and mitotic index of Pisum sativum roots, Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. 3: 27–29 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. E.L. Carstensen, S.Z. Child, W.K. Law, D.R. Horowitz and M.W. Miller, Cavitation as a mechanism for the biological effects of ultrasound on plant roots, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66: 1285–1291 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Liebesking, R. Bases, F. Elequin, S. Neubort, R. Leifer, R. Goldberg and. M. Kuenigsberg, Diagnostic ultrasound: effects on the DNA and growth patterns of animal cells, Radiology 131: 177–184 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. W.L. Nyborg, A. Gerhoy and D.L. Miller, Interaction of ultrasound with simple biological systems, pp. 19127 in “Ultrasonics International 1977 Conference Proceedings”, IPC Science and Technology Press Ltd, Guildford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.L. Miller, W.L. Nyborg and C.C. Whitcomb, Platelet aggregation induced by ultrasound under specialized conditions in vitro, Science 205: 505–507 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. W.L. Nyborg, “Physical Mechanisms for Biological Effects of Ultrasound”, HEW Publications (FDA) 78–8062, Bureau of Radiological Health, Rockville, MD 20857.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.R. Williams and D.L. Miller, Photometric detection of ATP release from human erythrocytes exposed to ultrasonically activated gas-filled pores, Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. 6: 351–256 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S.Z. Child, E.L. Carstensen and S.K. Lam, Effects of ultrasound on Drosophila: III Exposure of larvae to low-temporal-averageintensity, pulsed irradiation, Ultrasound in Med. and Biol. (1981, in press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nyborg, W.L., Miller, D.L. (1983). Physical Mechanisms for Biological Effects of Ultrasound at Low-Intensity Levels. In: Millner, R., Rosenfeld, E., Cobet, U. (eds) Ultrasound Interactions in Biology and Medicine. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8384-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8384-0_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8386-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8384-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics