The Value of Wetlands in Low Relief Landscapes

  • M. T. Brown
  • M. F. Sullivan


Much is known about wetland values, especially the values of wetlands associated with water bodies and stream corridors. A great deal of work has been done and is still being done concerning the value of coastal marshes and swamps to estuarine productivity and the values associated with floodplain wetlands and bottomland hardwood ecosystems. Values are associated with wildlife utilization and support and water quality functions among others. While much is known about wetland values, it still remains almost impossible to assess their values to society and therefore quantitatively to answer questions of public policy.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adamus, P. and Stockwell, S. (1983) A method of wetland functional assessment. FHWA no’s. 1P82–23 and 1P82–24. US Dept. of Transportation, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrhenius, O. (1921) Species and area, J. Ecol. 9, 95–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, M.T. and Starnes, E.M. (1983) A wetlands study of Seminole County: identification, evaluation, and preparation of development standards and guidelines. Gainesville, FL, Center for Wetlands, University of Florida, p. 284Google Scholar
  4. Brown, S.L. (1978) A comparison of cypress ecosystems in the landscape of Florida. PhD dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville, p. 570Google Scholar
  5. Gilliland, M.W. (1978) Energy analysis: A new public policy tool. AAAS Select Symposium. Westview Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Gleason, H.A. (1922) On the relationship between species and area. Ecology 3, 158–62Google Scholar
  7. Odum, H.T. (1976) Macroscopic minimodels of man and nature. In B. Patten (ed.) Systems analysis and simulation in ecology. Academic Press, New York, pp. 249–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Odum, H.T. (1978) Energy analysis, energy quality, and environment. In M.W. Gilliland (ed.) Energy analysis: a new public policy tool. AAAS Selected Symposium. Westview Press, New York, pp. 55–87Google Scholar
  9. Odum, H.T. (1984) Energy analysis evaluation of coastal alternatives. Water Sci. Technol. 16, 717–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Odum, H.T. (1986) Emergy in ecosystems. In N. Polunin (ed.) Environmental monographs and symposia. Sponsored by Foundation for Environmental Conservation, Geneva, Switzerland. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Odum, H.T., Cantlon, J.E. and Kornicker, L.S. (1960) An organizational hierarchy postulate for the interpretation of species-individual distributions, species entropy, ecosystem evolution, and the meaning of a species-variety index. Ecology 41, 395–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Odum, H.T., Lavine, M.J., Wang, F.C., Miller, M.A., Alexander, J.F. and Butler, T. (1983) A manual for using energy analysis for plant siting prepared for US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.NUREG/CR-2443. US Nuclear Reg. Commission, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Preston, F.W. (1960) Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology 13, 611–27Google Scholar
  14. Preston, F.W. (1962) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology 43, 185–215Google Scholar
  15. Sullivan, M.F. (1986) Organization of low-relief landscapes in north and central Florida. MS Thesis, Department of Geography, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  16. Winchester, B. (1982) Valuation of coastal plain wetlands in the southeastern United States. In P.M. McCaffrey, T. Beemer, and S.E. Gatewood (eds) Progress in wetlands utilization and management Dept. of Env. Regulation, Tallahassee, FL, pp. 285–98Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Donal D. Hook 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. T. Brown
  • M. F. Sullivan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations