E. coli O157:H7 in Frozen Raw Ground Beef Patties

  • International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods Staff

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with Escherichia coli O157:H7 in frozen raw ground beef patties. The information follows the principles outlined in earlier chapters. The unique severity of the pathogen and its impact among children under five years of age warrant special consideration. In this example, the merits of microbiological testing will be explored as a potential control measure to enhance the safety of ground beef. A significant portion of this material was published as a discussion paper (Tompkin & Bodnaruk, 1999). This example draws primarily on data from the US. The information may be applicable in other countries with similar prevalence rates in ground beef and where undercooking is a risk factor.

Keywords

Steam Anemia Diarrhea Dehydration Turkey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acheson, D. W. K. (2000). How does Escherichia coli O157:H7 testing in meat compare with what we are seeing clinically? J Food Prot 63, 819–821.Google Scholar
  2. AGA (American Gastroenterological Association) (1994). Consensus Conference Statement. E. coli O157:H7 Infections: An Emerging National Health Crisis, July 11–13, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. AMI (American Meat Institute) (2000). Meat & Poultry Facts 1999. Washington, DC: American Meat Institute.Google Scholar
  4. AMSA (American Meat Science Association) (1999). The Role of Microbiological Testing in Beef Food Safety Programs. The Scientific Perspective. Consensus of the 1999 Symposium. Kansas City, MO: The American Meat Science Association.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, K. W. & Kaspar, C. W. (1995). Starvation and stationary phase induced acid tolerance in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl Environ Microbiol 61, 2037–2039.Google Scholar
  6. Bacon, R. T., Belk, K. E., Sofos, J. N. et al. (2000). Microbial populations on animal hides and beef carcasses at different stages of slaughter in plants employing multiple-sequential interventions for decontamination. J Food Prot 63, 1080–1086.Google Scholar
  7. Benjamin, M. M. & Datta, A. R. (1995). Acid tolerance of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 61, 1669–1672.Google Scholar
  8. Bernard, D. T., Cole, W. R., Gombas, D. E. et al. (1997). Frozen, raw beef patties for food service. Dairy, Food & Environ San 17, 427–431.Google Scholar
  9. Buchanan, R. L. & Whiting, R. C. (1996). USDA Pathogen Modeling Program, version 5. 1. Philadelphia, PA: Agricultural Research Service-US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  10. Cassin, M. H., Lammerding, A. M., Todd, E. C. D. et al. (1998). Quantitative risk assessment for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef hamburgers. Int J Food Microbiol 41, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castillo, A., Lucia, L. M., Goodson, K. J. et al. (1998). Comparison of water wash, trimming, and combined hot water and lactic acid treatments for reducing bacteria of fecal origin on beef carcasses. J Food Prot 61, 823–828.Google Scholar
  12. CDC (Centers for Disease Control & Prevention) (1998a). Multistate surveillance for food-handling, preparation, and consumption behaviors associated with foodborne diseases: 1995 and 1996 BRFSS food-safety questions. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 47/No. SS-4.Google Scholar
  13. CDC (Centers for Disease Control & Prevention) (1998b). FoodNet 1997 Surveillance Results. http://www. cdc. gov/ncidod/dbmd/ foodnet/foodnet. htmGoogle Scholar
  14. CDC (Centers for Disease Control & Prevention) (2000). Preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of foodborne illnesses—selected sites, United States, 1999. MMWR 49, 201–205.Google Scholar
  15. CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) (2000). Canadian Microbiological Baseline Survey of Chicken Broiler and Young Turkey Carcasses, June 1997–May 1998. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Poultry Inspection Programs, Food of Animal Origin, Ottawa, Ontario, (available through website: http://www. inspection, gc. ca/ english/anima/ meavia/mmopmmhv/chap 19/baseline-e.pdf).Google Scholar
  16. Cheville, A. M., Arnold, K. W., Buchreiser, C. et al. (1996). rpoS regulation of acid, heat, salt tolerance in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl Environ Microbiol 62, 1822–1824.Google Scholar
  17. Dorsa, W. J. (1997). New and established carcass decontamination procedures commonly used in the beef-processing industry. J Food Prot 60, 1146–1151.Google Scholar
  18. Dorsa, W. J., Cutter, C. N., Siragusa, G. R. & Koohmaraie, M. (1996). Microbial decontamination of beef and sheep carcasses by steam, hot water spray washes, and a steam-vacuum sanitizer. J Food Prot 59, 127–135.Google Scholar
  19. Eisel, E. G., Linton, R. H. & Muriana, P. M. (1997). A survey of microbial levels for incoming raw beef, environmental sources, and ground beef in a red meat processing plant. Food Microbiol 14, 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elder, R. O., Keen, J. E., Siragusa, G. R. et al. (2000). Correlation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 prevalence in feces, hides and carcasses of beef cattle during processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97, 2999–3003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) (1999). Food Code. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration.Google Scholar
  22. Foster, E. M. (1971). The control of salmonellae in processed foods: A classification system and sampling plan. J AOAC 54, 259–266.Google Scholar
  23. FSIS (Food Safety and Inspection Service) (1993). Report on the Escherichia coli O157.H7 Outbreak in the Western States. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  24. FSIS (Food Safety and Inspection Service) (1994). Microbiological testing program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in raw ground beef. FSIS Notice 50–94 (12-23-94), US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. FSIS (Food Safety and Inspection Service) (1996). Nationwide Federal Plant Raw Ground Beef Microbiological Survey. August 1993–March 1994. US Department of Agriculture, Science and Technology Division, Microbiology Division, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. FSIS (Food Safety and Inspection Service) (1998). Preliminary Pathways and Data for a Risk Assessment of E. coli O157:H7 in Beef. Prepared by the E. coli O157:H7 risk assessment team. October 28, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Hancock, D. D. (1998). A Summary of E. coli Ol57:H7Research at Washington State University. Handout from Governor’s Conference on Ensuring Meat Safety, Developing a Research and Outreach Agenda on E. coli O157:H7. February 9–10, Lincoln, NB. Pullman, WA: Washington State University.Google Scholar
  28. ICMSF (International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods) (1986). Microorganisms in Foods 2. Sampling for Microbiological Analysis: Principles and Specific Applications, 2nd edn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  29. ICMSF (International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods) (1996). Intestinally pathogenic Escherichia coli. In Microorganisms in Foods 5. Characteristics of Microbial Pathogens, pp. 126–140. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Legan, J. D., Vandeven, M. H., Dahms, S. & Cole, M. B. (2001). Determining the concentration of microorganisms controlled by attributes sampling plans. Food Control 12, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leyer, G. J., Wang, L-L. & Johnson, E. A. (1995). Acid adaptation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 increases survival in acidic foods. Appl Environ Microbiol 61, 3752–3755.Google Scholar
  32. Line, J. E., Fain, A. R., Moran, A. B. et al. (1991). Lethality of heat to Escherichia coli O157:H7: D-value and z-value determinations in ground beef. J Food Prot 54, 762–766.Google Scholar
  33. Mahon, B. E., Griffin, P. M., Mead, P. S. & Tauxe, R. V (1997). Hemolytic uremic syndrome surveillance to monitor trends in infection with Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other Shiga toxin-producing E. coli. Emerging Infect Disease 3, 409–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mead, P. S., Slutsker, L., Dietz, V et al. (1999). Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerging Infect Disease 5, 607–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. NAS-NRC (National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council) (1969). An Evaluation of the Salmonella Problem. Publication No. 1683, Washington, DC: Committee on Salmonella, NAS-NRC.Google Scholar
  36. NRC (National Research Council) (1985). An Evaluation of the Role of Microbiological Criteria for Foods and Ingredients. Subcommittee on Microbiological Criteria. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nutsch, A. L., Phebus, R. K., Riemann, M. J. et al. (1998). Steam pasteurization of commercially slaughtered beef carcasses: evaluation of bacterial populations at five anatomical locations. J Food Prot 61, 571–577.Google Scholar
  38. Scanga, J. A., Grona, A. D., Belk, K. E. et al. (2000). Microbiological contamination of raw beef trimmings and ground beef. Meat Sci 56, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silliker, J. H. & Nickelson, R. (1995). Methods for Sampling and Compositing Fresh Red Meat Products for Analysis of Pathogenic and Indicator Bacteria. Final Report to the National Cattleman’s Beef Association (addendum of September 6, 1995 ). Engelwood, CO: National Cattleman’s Beef Association.Google Scholar
  40. Sofos, J. N., Belk, K. E. & Smith, G. C. (1999). Processes to reduce contamination with pathogenic microorganisms in meat. In Congress Proceedings, 7-L2 pp. 597–606. 45th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, August 1–6, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
  41. Sofos, J. N. & Smith, G. C. (1998). Nonacid meat decontamination technologies: Model studies and commercial applications. Int J Food Microbiol 44, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tarr, P. I. (1994). Testimony to Washington State Senate, Department of Agriculture. January 20, 1994.Google Scholar
  43. Todd, E. C. D., Szabo, R. A., Peterkin, P. et al. (1988). Rapid hydrophobic grid membrane filter-enzyme-labeled antibody procedure for identification and enumeration of Escherichia coli O157 in foods. Appl Environ Microbiol 54, 2536–2540.Google Scholar
  44. Tompkin, R. B. & Bodnaruk, R W. (1999). A proposed food safety management plan for E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef. In The Role of Microbiological Testing in Beef Food Safety Programs. Edited by C. Calkins and M. Koohmaraie. Kansas City, MO: American Meat Science Association.Google Scholar
  45. USDA (US Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service-Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health) (1994). Escherichia coli 0157.H7 Issues and Ramifications. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health.Google Scholar
  46. WHO (World Health Organization) (1997). Prevention and Control of Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) Infections (WHO/FSF/FOS/97. 6 ). Geneva: Food Safety Unit, Programme of Food Safety and Food Aid, World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods Staff

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations