Advertisement

Chemical Aspects of The Corrosion Behaviour of Type 316 Stainless Steel in Liquid Lithium and Liquid Sodium

  • Marten G. Barker
  • Stephen A. Frankham
  • Paul G. Gadd
  • David R. Moore

Abstract

Stainless steel Type 316 is the alloy most favoured for use in both fast reactors and fusion reactor systems. Although the corrosion behaviour of 316 steel in sodium has been extensively studied much less is known about its performance in liquid lithium. This paper compares the interactions of the non-metals oxygen, carbon, nitrogen and silicon dissolved in the liquid metals lithium and sodium with the component metals in 316 steel. A particular difference between sodium and lithium is the ease with which the latter penetrates the grain boundaries of the steel, the influence of this penetration on carburization and nitridation rates will be discussed.

Keywords

High Carbon Steel Liquid Sodium Sodium Oxide Liquid Lithium Nitrogen Transfer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. E. Wicks & F. E. Block, U.S. Bur. Mines Bull., 605, 1963.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. W. Osborne & H. E. Flotow, J. Chem. Thermodynamics, 1978, 10, 675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. J. Pulham, Paper presented at this Conference.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. F. Adams, P. Hubberstey & R. J. Pulham, J. Less Common Met., 1975, 42, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. W. Thorley, As quoted in J. Nucl. Energy, 1965, 9, 849.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. F. Adams, M. G. Down, P. Hubberstey & R. J. Pulham, J. Less Common Met., 1975, 42, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. M. Yonco & M. I. Homa, Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc., 1979, 32, 270.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Thompson, Paper presented at IAEA Specialist Meeting on Carbon in Sodium, Harwell, England. November 1979.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. G. Barker & J. Bentham, J. Less Common Met., 1975, 40, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. R. Juza & J. Haug, A. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1961, 309, 276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. W. Thorley & M. R. Hobdell, Paper presented at IAEA, Specialist Meeting on Carbon in Sodium, Harwell, England, November 1979.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. J. McGown & C. Bagnall, Paper presented at IAEA Specialist Meeting on Carbon in Sodium, Harwell, England, November 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marten G. Barker
    • 1
  • Stephen A. Frankham
    • 1
  • Paul G. Gadd
    • 1
  • David R. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of NottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations