Investigations of the Reactions of Mammalian Brain to Static Magnetic Fields

  • Ju. A. Kholodov
  • M. M. Alexandrovskaya
  • S. N. Lukjanova
  • N. S. Udarova


The central nervous system plays a significant role in the reactions of organisms to static magnetic fields (SMF). [See Kholodov (1964, 1966), Becker (1963), Vjalov (1967), among others.] Our present aim was to investigate the initial reactions of the mammalian brain to a SMF by conditioned reflex, electrophysiological, and histological methods.


Cerebral Cortex Conditioned Stimulus Latent Period Static Magnetic Field Mammalian Brain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. M. M. Alexandrovskaja and Ju. A. Kholodov, Bionika, p. 127, Kiev (1968); Conference on the Problems of Memory, p. 5, Pushino (1966).Google Scholar
  2. R. O. Becker, N.Y. State Med. J. 63: 2215 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. T. Gualtirotti, Proceedings of the XII International Astronautical Congress, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, p. 587 (1964).Google Scholar
  4. K. A. Ivanov-Muromsky and A. I. Likhachev, Certain Problems of Cybernetics, Kiev, pp. 1, 92 (1967).Google Scholar
  5. Ju. A. Kholodov, Transactions of the Conference on Physiology of Fish, Moscow, p. 82 (1958).Google Scholar
  6. Ju. A. Kholodov, in: Biological Effects of Magnetic Fields (M. F. Barnothy, ed.) Vol. 1, p. 196, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Ju. A. Kholodov, The Influence of the Electromagnetic Field on the Central Nervous System, Nauka, Moskow (1966).Google Scholar
  8. Ju. A. Kholodov, M. M. Alexandrovskaja, S. N. Lukyanova, and R. A. Chizhenkova, Third Interational Biomagnetic Symposium, Chicago, p. 37 (1966).Google Scholar
  9. Ju. A. Kholodov, Hygiena of Labour and Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, Moscow, p. 166 (1968).Google Scholar
  10. J. C. Knepton and D. E. Beischer, Aerosp. Med. 37: 287 (1966).Google Scholar
  11. H. W. Lissman, J. Exp. Biol. 35: 156 (1958).Google Scholar
  12. S. N. Lukjanova, Hygiena of Labour and Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, Moscow (1968).Google Scholar
  13. V. B. Malkin, N. M. Askjamolova, G. V. Yzosimov, and K. K. Monakhov, Izv. AN USSR, Ser. Biol. 4: 584 (1965).Google Scholar
  14. A. R. Orgel and J. C. Smith, J. Genet. Psychol. 88: 203 (1956).Google Scholar
  15. M. R. Pereira, L. G. Nutini, J. C. Fardon, and E. S. Cook, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 124: 124 (1967).Google Scholar
  16. I. R. Petrov, Role of Central Nervous System, Adenohypophysys and Adrenal Cortex in Oxygene Starvation, Medizina, Leningrad (1967).Google Scholar
  17. M. A. Shyshlo and L. L. Shimkevich, Third International Biomagnetic Symposium, Chicago, p. 16 (1966).Google Scholar
  18. O. D. Sittler, Third International Biomagnetic Symposium, Chicago, p. 34 (1966).Google Scholar
  19. G. A. Tarakanova, Conference on Effects of Magnetic Fields on Biological Objects, Moscow, p. 68 (1966).Google Scholar
  20. I. V. Toropzev, Arch. Path. 30: 3 (1968).Google Scholar
  21. A. M. Vjalov, Vestnik AMS USSR 8: 52 (1958).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ju. A. Kholodov
    • 1
  • M. M. Alexandrovskaya
    • 1
  • S. N. Lukjanova
    • 1
  • N. S. Udarova
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and NeurophysiologyAcademy of SciencesMoscowUSSR

Personalised recommendations