Advertisement

The Pairing-Plus-Quadrupole Model

  • Daniel R. Bes
  • Raymond A. Sorensen

Abstract

The most successful nuclear models in the correlation of large amounts of diverse nuclear data have been the independent-particle model(1) and the collective model.(2) On the other hand, the more fundamental calculations with the use of the experimental two-body “force” are hard pressed to reproduce nuclear saturation quantitatively, and only recently have serious attempts been made to calculate properties of actual nuclear states on this basis.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. G. Mayer and J. H. Jensen, “Nuclear Shell Theory,” John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (1955).MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Bohr, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab Mat. Fys. Medd. 26: (14) (1952).Google Scholar
  3. A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab Mat. Fys. Medd. 27: (16) (1953).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    S. G. Nilsson, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab Mat. Fys. Medd. 29: (16) (1955).Google Scholar
  5. B. R. Mottelson and S. G. Nilsson, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab Mat. Fys. Skrifter 1: (8) (1959).Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    J. P. Elliott, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A245: 128–562 (1958).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 5.
    A. Bohr, B. R. Mottelson, and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. 110: 936 (1958).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 6.
    E. U. Condon and G. H. Shortley, “The Theory of Atomic Spectra,” Cambridge University Press, New York (1957).MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 7.
    S. T. Belyaev, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab Mat. Fys. Medd. 31: (11) (1959).Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    B. R. Mottelson, “Selected Topics in the Theory of Collective Phenomena in Nuclei,” in “Nuclear Spectroscopy” (G. Racah, ed.) Academic Press, New York (1962).Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    M. Baranger and K. Kumar, “The Calculation of Nuclear Deformations,” in “Perspectives in Modern Physics” (R. E. Marshak, ed.) Wiley-Interscience, New York (1966); also Nucl. Phys. A110: 490 (1968).Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    R. A. Uher and R. A. Sorensen, Nuc. Phys. 86: 1 (1966).Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    E. R. Marshalek, Phys. Rev. 139: B770 (1965).ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. E. R. Marshalek, Phys. Rev. 158: 993 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. E. R. Marshalek, Phys. Rev. Letters 20: 214 (1968).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 12.
    K. Kumar and M. Baranger, Nucl. Phys. A110: 529 (1968).Google Scholar
  17. 13.
    L. S. Kisslinger and R. A. Sorensen, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab Mat. Fys. Medd. 32: (9) (1960).Google Scholar
  18. 14.
    D. Bes, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab Mat. Fys. Medd. 33: (2) (1961).Google Scholar
  19. 15.
    D. Bes and Z. Szymanski, Nucl. Phys. 28: 42 (1961).Google Scholar
  20. Z. Szymanski, Nucl. Phys. 28: 63 (1961).Google Scholar
  21. 16.
    S. G. Nilsson and O. Prior, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab Mat. Fys. Medd. 32: (16) (1961).Google Scholar
  22. 17.
    G. E. Brown and T. T. S. Kuo, Nucl. Phys. A92: 481 (1967).Google Scholar
  23. 18.
    E. Jakeman and S. A. Moszkowski, Phys. Rev. 141: 933 (1966).ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 19.
    G. Racah, Physica 18: 1097 (1952).ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 20.
    B. R. Mottelson, “Cours de l’École d’Été de Physique Théorique des Houches 1958,” Dunod, Paris (1959).Google Scholar
  26. 21.
    A. K. Kerman, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 12: 300 (1961).ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 22.
    R. D. Lawson and M. H. Macfarlane, Nucl. Phys. 66: 80 (1965).Google Scholar
  28. 23.
    A. K. Kerman, R. D. Lawson, and M. H. Macfarlane, Phys. Rev. 124: 162 (1961).ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 24.
    R. W. Richardson, Phys. Rev. 141: 949 (1966).ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 25.
    J. Bardeen, L. Cooper, and R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 108: 1175 (1957).ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 26.
    J. Högaasen Feldman, Nuci. Phys. 28: 258 (1961).Google Scholar
  32. I. Unna and J. Weneser, Phys. Rev. 137: B1455 (1965).ADSGoogle Scholar
  33. M. Rho, Nuci. Phys. 75: 481 (1966).Google Scholar
  34. B. Sorensen, Nucl. Phys. A97: 1 (1967).Google Scholar
  35. 27.
    B. Bayman, Nucl. Phys. 15: 33 (1960).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. I. N. Michailov, Soviet Phys. JETP (English Transi.) 18: 761 (1964).Google Scholar
  37. Y. Nogami, Phys. Rev. 134: B313 (1964).ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. Y. Nogami and I. J. Zucker, Nucl. Phys. 60: 203 (1964).Google Scholar
  39. H. Mang, J. K. Poggenburg, and J. O. Rasmussen, Nuci. Phys. 64: 353 (1965).Google Scholar
  40. H. J. Mang, J. O. Rasmussen, and M. Rho, Phys. Rev. 141: 941 (1966).ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. A. Lande, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 31: 525 (1965).ADSGoogle Scholar
  42. S. G. Nilsson, Nucl. Phys. 55: 97 (1964).Google Scholar
  43. J. Bang, J. Krumlinde, and S. G. Nilsson, Phys. Letters 15: 85 (1965).ADSGoogle Scholar
  44. J. Bang, J. Krumlinde, and S. G. Nilsson, Phys. Letters 20: 661 (1966).ADSGoogle Scholar
  45. 28.
    R. R. Chasman, Phys. Rev. 132: 343 (1963).ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. R. R. Chasman, Phys. Rev. 134: B279 (1964).ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. R. R. Chasman, Phys. Rev. 138: B326 (1965).ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. R. R. Chasman, Phys. Rev. 156: 1197 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  49. S. Wahlborn, Arkiv. Fysik 31: 33–319 (1966).Google Scholar
  50. G. Do Dang and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. 143: 735 (1966).ADSGoogle Scholar
  51. G. Do Dang and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. 147: 689 (1966).ADSGoogle Scholar
  52. K. Hara, Nucl. Phys. A95: 385 (1967).Google Scholar
  53. A. Covello and E. Salusti, to be published.Google Scholar
  54. A. P. Zuker, Nucl. Phys. A106: 641 (1968).Google Scholar
  55. 29.
    N. N. Bogolubiov, Soviet Phys. JETP, 34: 58–73 (1958).Google Scholar
  56. N. N. Bogolubiov, Nuovo Cimento 7: 794 (1958).Google Scholar
  57. J. G. Valatin, Nuovo Cimento 7: 843 (1958).Google Scholar
  58. 30.
    L. S. Kisslinger and R. A. Sorensen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 35: 853 (1963).ADSGoogle Scholar
  59. 31.
    B. Bayman, “Seniority, Quasi-Particles and Collective Vibrations,” lectures given in the Palmer Physical Laboratory, Princeton University (1960), unpublished notes.Google Scholar
  60. 32.
    C. Monsonego and R. Piepenbring, Nuci. Phys. 58: 593 (1964).Google Scholar
  61. M. N. Vergnes and J. O. Rasmussen, Nucl. Phys. 62: 233 (1965).Google Scholar
  62. 33.
    M. Sakai and S. Yoshida, Nucl. Phys. 50: 497 (1964).Google Scholar
  63. V. G. Soloviev, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab Mat. Fys. Skrifter, 1: (11) (1961).Google Scholar
  64. 34.
    S. Yoshida, Nucl. Phys. 33: 685 (1962).Google Scholar
  65. V. G. Soloviev, Phys. Letters 1: 202 (1962).ADSGoogle Scholar
  66. H. J. Mang and J. O. Rasmussen, Kgl. Mat. Fys. Skrifter Danske Videnskab. Selskab 2: (3) (1962).Google Scholar
  67. 35.
    J. H. Bjerregaard, O. Hansen, O. Nathan, R. Chapman, S. Hinds, and R. Middleton, Nucl. Phys. A103: 33 (1967).Google Scholar
  68. G. Bassani, J. R. Maxwell, G. Reynolds, and N. M. Hintz, Paper presented at In- ternational Conference on Nuclear Physics, Éditions DU C.N.R.S. Paris (1964).Google Scholar
  69. 36.
    B. Bayman and N. Hintz, Phys. Rev. 172: 1113 (1968).ADSGoogle Scholar
  70. 37.
    G. F. Bertsch, R. A. Broglia, and C. Riedel, Nucl. Phys. A91: 123 (1967).Google Scholar
  71. 38.
    R. A. Broglia and C. Riedel, Nucl. Phys. A92: 145 (1967).Google Scholar
  72. 39.
    A. Sandulescu and O. Dimitrescu, Phys. Letters 19: 405 (1965).ADSGoogle Scholar
  73. 40.
    A. B. Migdal, Nucl. Phys. 13: 655 (1959).Google Scholar
  74. J. Blatt, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 24: 851 (1960).ADSGoogle Scholar
  75. R. E. Prange, Nucl. Phys. 22: 283 (1961).Google Scholar
  76. A. Katz, Nucl. Phys. 26: 129 (1961).Google Scholar
  77. S. T. Belyaev, Nucl. Phys. 24: 322 (1961).Google Scholar
  78. D. J. Thouless and J. G. Valatin, Nucl. Phys. 31: 211 (1962).Google Scholar
  79. 41.
    S. T. Belyaev, in “Selected Topics in Nuclear Theory,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1963), p. 291.Google Scholar
  80. S. T. Belyaev, Soviet J. Nucl. Phys. 4: 671 (1967).Google Scholar
  81. 42.
    J. P. Elliott, in “Selected Topics in Nuclear Theory,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1963), p. 157.Google Scholar
  82. 43.
    M. Harvey, in “Advances in Nuclear Physics,” Vol. 1 (M. Baranger and E. Vogt, eds.), Plenum Press, New York (1968), p. 67.Google Scholar
  83. 44.
    B. F. Bayman, “Comptes rendus du congrès international de physique nucléaire, Paris,” Dunod, Paris (1958), p. 710.Google Scholar
  84. 45.
    G. Ripka, in “Advances in Nuclear Physics,” Vol. 1 (M. Baranger and E. Vogt, eds.), Plenum Press, New York (1968) p. 183.Google Scholar
  85. 46.
    M. R. Gunye and S. Das Gupta, Nucl. Phys. 89: 443 (1966).Google Scholar
  86. 47.
    T. D. Newton, Can. J. Phys. 38: 700 (1960).ADSGoogle Scholar
  87. S. Das Gupta and M. A. Preston, Nucl. Phys. 49: 401 (1963).Google Scholar
  88. 48.
    C. Gustafson, I. L. Lamm, B. Nilsson, and S. G. Nilsson, Arkiv Fysik 36: 613 (1967).Google Scholar
  89. J. Griffin, Phys. Rev. 132: 2204 (1963).ADSGoogle Scholar
  90. W. Stepien and Z. Szymanski, Phys. Letters 26B: 181 (1968).ADSGoogle Scholar
  91. 49.
    J. G. Valatin, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 238A: 132 (1956).ADSGoogle Scholar
  92. J. G. Valatin, “Lectures on Theoretical Physics,” Vol. 4, Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York (1962).Google Scholar
  93. 50.
    J. J. Griffin and M. Rich, Phys. Rev. Letters 3: 342 (1959).ADSGoogle Scholar
  94. J. J. Griffin and M. Rich, Phys. Rev. 118: 850 (1960).ADSGoogle Scholar
  95. 51.
    A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab Mat. Fys. Medd. 30: (1) (1955).Google Scholar
  96. 52.
    B. R. Mottelson and J. G. Valatin, Phys. Rev. Letters 5: 511 (1960).ADSGoogle Scholar
  97. K. Y. Chan and J. G. Valatin, Nucl. Phys. 82: 222 (1966).Google Scholar
  98. K. Y. Chan, Nucl. Phys. 85: 261 (1966).Google Scholar
  99. M. Sano and M. Wakai, Nucl. Phys. A97: 298 (1967).Google Scholar
  100. T. Udagawa and R. K. Sheline, Phys. Rev. 147: 671 (1966).ADSGoogle Scholar
  101. D. R. Bes, S. Landowne, and M. Mariscotti, Phys. Rev. 166: 1045 (1968).ADSGoogle Scholar
  102. 53.
    R. Arvieu and M. Veneroni, Compt. Rend. 250: 992–2155 (1960).Google Scholar
  103. M. Baranger, Phys. Rev. 120: 957 (1960).ADSGoogle Scholar
  104. M. Kobayasi and T. Marumori, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 23: 387 (1960).ADSGoogle Scholar
  105. T. Marumori, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 24: 331 (1960).ADSGoogle Scholar
  106. 54.
    D. J. Thouless, Nucl. Phys. 21: 225 (1960).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  107. D. J. Thouless, Nucl. Phys. 22: 78 (1961).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  108. 55.
    R. A. Sorensen, Nucl. Phys. 25: 674 (1961).Google Scholar
  109. 56.
    J. deBoer and J. Eichler, in “Advances in Nuclear Physics,” Vol. 1 (M. Baranger and E. Vogt, eds.), Plenum Press, New York (1968), p. 1.Google Scholar
  110. 57.
    E. R. Marshalek and J. O. Rasmussen, Nucl. Phys. 43: 438 (1963).Google Scholar
  111. V. G. Soloviev, Atomic Energy Review 3: 117 (1965).Google Scholar
  112. D. Bes, Nucl. Phys. 49: 544 (1963).Google Scholar
  113. D. Bes, P. Federman, E. Maqueda, and A. P. Zuker, Nucl. Phys. 65: 1 (1965).Google Scholar
  114. 58.
    S. T. Belyaev and V. G. Zelevinsky, Nucl. Phys. 39: 582 (1962).Google Scholar
  115. T. Marumori, M. Yamamura, and A. Tokunaga, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 31: 1009 (1964).ADSGoogle Scholar
  116. T. Marumori, M. Yamamura, A. Tokunaga, and N. Takada, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 32: 726 (1964).ADSGoogle Scholar
  117. J. DaProvidenca, Nucl. Phys. 83: 209 (1966).Google Scholar
  118. B. Sorensen, Nucl. Phys. A97: 1 (1967).Google Scholar
  119. G. Do Dang and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. 133: B257 (1964).ADSGoogle Scholar
  120. Do Dang and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. 156: 1159 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  121. R. M. Dreizier, A. Klein, C. S. Wu, and G. Do Dang, Phys. Rev. 156: 1167 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  122. 59.
    M. Baranger and K. Kumar, Nucl. Phys. 92: 608 (1967).Google Scholar
  123. M. Baranger and K. Kumar, Phys. Rev. Letters 11: 1146 (1966).Google Scholar
  124. 60.
    V. G. Soloviev and P. Vogel, Nucl. Phys. A92: 449 (1967).Google Scholar
  125. 61.
    D. R. Bes and Y. Cho, Nucl. Phys. 86: 581 (1966).Google Scholar
  126. 62.
    R. A. Sorensen, Phys. Rev. 133: B2811 (1964).Google Scholar
  127. 63.
    L. S. Kisslinger and K. Kumar, Phys. Rev. Letters 19: 1239 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  128. 64.
    R. A. Sorensen, Phys. Letters 21: 333 (1966).ADSGoogle Scholar
  129. 65.
    H. Schmidt, Z. Physik 181: 532 (1964).ADSGoogle Scholar
  130. D. R. Bes and R. A. Broglia, Nucl. Phys. 80: 290 (1966).Google Scholar
  131. 66.
    J. H. Bjerregaard, O. Hansen, O. Nathan, and S. Hinds, Nucl. Phys. 89: 337 (1966).Google Scholar
  132. G. M. Reynolds, J. R. Maxwell, and N. M. Hintz, Phys. Rev. 153: 1283 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  133. 67.
    N. Glendenning, Phys. Rev. 156: 1344 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  134. 68.
    W. W. True and K. W. Ford, Phys. Rev. 109: 1675 (1958).ADSGoogle Scholar
  135. 69.
    L. S. Kisslinger, Nucl. Phys. 35: 114 (1962).Google Scholar
  136. J. A. Halbleib and R. A. Sorensen, Nucl. Phys. A98: 542 (1967).Google Scholar
  137. N. Fried and L. S. Kisslinger, Nucl. Phys. 25: 611 (1961).Google Scholar
  138. A. A. Kuliev and L Pyatov, Nucl. Phys. A106: 699 (1968).Google Scholar
  139. 70.
    R. Arvieu, E. Baranger, E. Veneroni, M. Baranger, and V. Gillet, Phys. Letters 4: 119 (1963).ADSGoogle Scholar
  140. R. Arvieu and M. Veneroni, Phys. Letters 5: 142 (1963).ADSGoogle Scholar
  141. H. J. Mang, J. K. Poggenburg, and J. O. Rasmussen, Nucl. Phys. 64: 353 (1965).Google Scholar
  142. E. U. Baranger, M. Baranger, and T. S. Kuo, Nucl. Phys, 81: 241 (1966).Google Scholar
  143. D. M. Clement and E. U. Baranger, Nucl. Phys. 89: 145 (1966).Google Scholar
  144. 71.
    R. Arvieu and E. Salusti, Nucl. Phys. 66: 305 (1965).Google Scholar
  145. 72.
    A. R. Edmonds, “Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics,” Princeton University Press Princeton, N. J. (1957).MATHGoogle Scholar
  146. 73.
    H. J. Lipkin and S. Goldstein, Nucl. Phys. 5: 202 (1958).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel R. Bes
    • 1
  • Raymond A. Sorensen
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations