Advertisement

Reduction of Cardiac Risk Factors by Autogenic Training and Physical Training

  • Malcolm Carruthers

Abstract

Physical training has long been regarded as one of the ways of balancing up the physical responses induced by stress, and the craze for jogging has become a mania to the extent that psychiatrists and psychologists, being unable to beat the craze, have joined it and now run alongside their patients as part of the treatment of depression (1). Not only is this regarded as having a powerful influence in reducing cardiac risk factors (2) and preventing (3) and treating (4) coronary heart disease, but there are encouraging signs that by regularly increasing the level of sympathetic activity by periods of vigorous but not violent physical activity, there is a beneficial rebound enhancement of parasympathetic activity in the resting state. This is shown by the lower blood pressure, slower pulse rate, and greater sinus arrhythmia effect seen in individuals who undertake physical training. As shown by the research at the City Gymnasium in London reported by myself and Alistair Murray in our book “F/40: Fitness on 30 Minutes a Week” (5). the amount of exercise needed to achieve a significant and useful cardioprotective training effect is fortunately relatively small and can be controlled safely by attention to maximum pulse rate and perceived exertion. We are also developing wrist watches which will automatically signal when either heart rate or blood pressure exceed predetermined safety levels.

Keywords

Uric Acid Physical Training Parasympathetic Activity Cardiac Risk Factor Autogenic Training 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Griest, J.H., Klein, M.H., Eischens, R.R. Running through your mind. J. Psychosomatic Research, 22: 259–294, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Durbeck, D.C., Heinzelmann, F., Schacter, J. et al. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration — US Public Health Service Evaluation and Enhancement Program. Am. J. Cardiology, 30:784–790, 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morris J.N., Everitt, M.G., Pollard, R. et al. Vigorous exercise in leisure time: protection against coronary heart disease. Lancet 2:1207–1210, 1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kavanagh, T., Kennedy, J., Qureshi, S. Prognosis in myo cardial infarction — the benefits of exercise as seen in non-randomized trials. Brit. J. Sports Med. 15:6–16, 1981Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carruthers M. and Murray A., F/40: Fitness on Forty Minutes a Week. Futura Books, London, 1976Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patel C. and Carruthers M. Coronary risk factor reduction through biofeedback-aided relaxation and meditation. J. Royal College Practitioners 27:401–405, 1977Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patel, C., Marmot, M.G., Terry, D.J., Controlled trial of biofeedback-aided behavioural methods in reducing mild hypertension. Brit. Med. J. 282:2005–2008, 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luthe, W. Autogenic Therapy, vol 4, Research and Theory, Grune and Stratton, New York, 1969Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carruthers, M. Log-a-Risk: An aid to advising the coronary candidate. J. Royal College General Practitioners, 25:30–223, 1975Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malcolm Carruthers
    • 1
  1. 1.Director of Clinical Laboratory ServicesMaudsley & Bethlem Royal HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations